What's new

Projectile supposedly fired from Iran lands in Pakistan

We will take our revenge after you free your women from Indian soldier's hands.
Really well damn ur logic and for another its the other way around we have there woman in our hands and yours. wanna see come to dublin woman of these two countries have really made that city heaven for us pakistani's.
 
Please, tell me who are your enemies? Your main enemy is just India.
your daddy america and your other daddy europe and do u really not know the current struggle between west and china which directly involves pakistan. Read some news!!!!
 
The presence of terrorists in Pakistani areas on the Iran border attacking our border guards etc
Your border guards were killed because they mistakenly tried to stop terrorists from returning to their safe heaven.
As for Saudis,not a single Saudi backed anti iran terrorist organization operates from pakistan.you yourself accepted that pak-iran border areas are neglected by mullah regime.Just Think why "because even they know Pakistan is not supporter of terrorism in Iran".Its Iran that allow indians to use its territory against Pakistan.
 
So you pointed to 'large areas', indeed there are large areas with a very scarce population with mountains and dunes and no proper roads, these areas exist on both sides of Pak/Iran border you could claim that may be there is some nominal difference of '%age of control' as you already admitted for 'less control' in your border area.
If other than such areas you are aware of, please enlighten us.
The Pakistani side is a no-mans land unfortunately. Anyone can come in and out as they please. There are terrorist groups active there and the Iranian government has on several occasions alerted the Pakistani government about this but no firm actions were taken.

At the Iranian side there is better control but not in terms of preventing a possible hit and run attack. However, you will not see non-state armed groups 5KM into Iranian territory in the open doing whatever they want. Unlike Pakistan.



There are no armed men in a direct challenge to the Pakistani authority.
Are you serious? There is heavy militant activity on Pakistani territory.

The incidents are on borders and only hit and run tactics to be in media by such terrorists/saboteurs/assassins to please their handlers. World witness that when those scums surrounded, how our forces cleaned those filthy rats.
Yes, sure they happen exactly on the borders. There are for sure no tribal areas outside your gov control. Didn't you have several major military operations against the militants challenging the Pakistani gov?
 
The Pakistani side is a no-mans land unfortunately. Anyone can come in and out as they please. There are terrorist groups active there and the Iranian government has on several occasions alerted the Pakistani government about this but no firm actions were taken.

At the Iranian side there is better control but not in terms of preventing a possible hit and run attack. However, you will not see non-state armed groups 5KM into Iranian territory in the open doing whatever they want. Unlike Pakistan.
You reposted my post with just some variations to show Iran is in better 'control', that I already said maybe the nominal '%age of control' is better on your side.

Are you serious? There is heavy militant activity on Pakistani territory.
Oh ... ! :woot:
We were just unaware of the 'heavy' militant activity on Pakistani territory. Thanks for enlightening us.

Yes, sure they happen exactly on the borders. There are for sure no tribal areas outside your gov control. Didn't you have several major military operations against the militants challenging the Pakistani gov?
Most of the TTP is in Afghanistan. They do the cross-border firing and their sleeper cells become active when 'foreign masters' pour in some money in their holes.
Same sleeper cells in your country maybe you could say at a lower scale because they are attempting only on specific targets like scientists, military leaders to achieve their interests.
 
The Pakistani side is a no-mans land unfortunately. Anyone can come in and out as they please. There are terrorist groups active there and the Iranian government has on several occasions alerted the Pakistani government about this but no firm actions were taken.

At the Iranian side there is better control but not in terms of preventing a possible hit and run attack. However, you will not see non-state armed groups 5KM into Iranian territory in the open doing whatever they want. Unlike Pakistan.




Are you serious? There is heavy militant activity on Pakistani territory.


Yes, sure they happen exactly on the borders. There are for sure no tribal areas outside your gov control. Didn't you have several major military operations against the militants challenging the Pakistani gov?
Looks like you are living in 2010. there is not a single militant held territory in pakistan, all the places have been taken back only sleepers cells are left and the scums coming from ur country. Only information based operations are conducted. Every city every town and every village is under the control of our gov
 
You reposted my post with just some variations to show Iran is in better 'control', that I already said maybe the nominal '%age of control' is better on your side.


Oh ... ! :woot:
We were just unaware of the 'heavy' militant activity on Pakistani territory. Thanks for enlightening us.


Most of the TTP is in Afghanistan. They do the cross-border firing and their sleeper cells become active when 'foreign masters' pour in some money in their holes.
Same sleeper cells in your country maybe you could say at a lower scale because they are attempting only on specific targets like scientists, military leaders to achieve their interests.
As long you fail to admit that there is big trouble on the Pakistani side we will continue seeing this mess. Iranians already admit that in our country the Balouchi border areas and some other border points are somewhat insecure because of the lack of interest from the government. But even with this we still have control and there is no tolerance for militant activity. Most of the attacks on our border guards is coming from the direction of Pakistan. After their attacks they escape back to Pakistan. Those Pakistani areas are huge and unmanned.
 
As long you fail to admit that there is big trouble on the Pakistani side we will continue seeing this mess. Iranians already admit that in our country the Balouchi border areas and some other border points are somewhat insecure because of the lack of interest from the government. But even with this we still have control and there is no tolerance for militant activity. Most of the attacks on our border guards is coming from the direction of Pakistan. After their attacks they escape back to Pakistan. Those Pakistani areas are huge and unmanned.

As the term, 'terrorist' does not have a uniform definition, it varies from country to country, so the 'control' also varies from country to country.
The same is the reciprocating thinking on our side. We also have the 'trail of Kalbhushan' that leads to 'superior control' of Iran.
 
As the term, 'terrorist' does not have a uniform definition, it varies from country to country, so the 'control' also varies from country to country.
The same is the reciprocating thinking on our side. We also have the 'trail of Kalbhushan' that leads to 'superior control' of Iran.
What part of my post you do not understand? The fact that i said that our border areas are still neglected but still of importance that we do not allow it to become terrorist haven? And that Pakistan can adopt such measures too if it wants? I mean if you think further you can connect the dots but you don't want to do it. Just snarky remarks.

Just think for yourself. Why did Iraq have a peaceful and secure borders with Iran despite being the most affected by international terrorism? How can our borders with Turkey,Azarbaijan,Iraq and even Afghanistan be more secure than Pakistan?
 
What part of my post you do not understand? The fact that i said that our border areas are still neglected but still of importance that we do not allow it to become terrorist haven? And that Pakistan can adopt such measures too if it wants? I mean if you think further you can connect the dots but you don't want to do it. Just snarky remarks.
I understand your personal definitions and grasp them. There is no dot to be connected all are well connected by everyone's own interests.
There is the history of those dots if you use proper spectacles to see the connections.
Further, it is as simple to understand that your remarks seem most snarkier to me.

Just think for yourself. Why did Iraq have a peaceful and secure borders with Iran despite being the most affected by international terrorism? How can our borders with Turkey,Azarbaijan,Iraq and even Afghanistan be more secure than Pakistan?
After eight years of killing each other Iran and Iraq now maybe in their senses. Could you tell that war costed how many lives to both countries?
Did you forget the history of Panjsher?
Turkey is an assertive state leave them aside they are above average.
 
I understand your personal definitions and grasp them. There is no dot to be connected all are well connected by everyone's own interests.
There is the history of those dots if you use proper spectacles to see the connections.
Further, it is as simple to understand that your remarks seem most snarkier to me.


After eight years of killing each other Iran and Iraq now maybe in their senses. Could you tell that war costed how many lives to both countries?
Did you forget the history of Panjsher?
Turkey is an assertive state leave them aside they are above average.
I try to understand your mindset since you come from a nation that borders mine. I mean, if the things i explained to you has not made you consider some issues at least then i will rest my case. No point in continuing this further.
 
I try to understand your mindset since you come from a nation that borders mine. I mean, if the things i explained to you has not made you consider some issues at least then i will rest my case. No point in continuing this further.

Dear, in this cruel world either one has to stick with the principles OR to keep changing goalposts. Most of the nations adopt the second part of the sentence.
Even in our religion, the importance of neighbors is principal but in case of hostilities, one has to deal with that too.
No hard feelings - Peace.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom