What's new

President’s Arunachal visit irks China

If..but...never works.

They are a permanent part of India now. Logically whole Pakistan is ours but thats illogical to ask back. Same is the case with these.

There was no "if..but..." in my post. Merely stating a piece history that so many indians denied.

Logically and factually, Pakistan never belonged to India. British created both India and Pakistan in 1947. Prior to the British, there was no India the country.
 
There was no "if..but..." in my post. Merely stating a piece history that so many indians denied.

Logically and factually, Pakistan never belonged to India. British created both India and Pakistan in 1947. Prior to the British, there was no India the country.
Pakistan was under the name 'INDIA' but before independence it was ruled by local kings.

logically it was part of 'united India' and factually it is not.
 
India as a country was only created in 1947
no i am right u can say India was created in 1930's u can see many cultural revolutions,new businesses, changes in aaam admi soach, changes in our fashion, etc.
 
Like I said, Can anybody do anything about it now
You're not capable of engaging in one, how could you recognize one.

dude, if you can do anything about it then do it, else you know...its all talk.
 
1947 is older than united China created in 1950 before that China wasn't a united country for more than 50 years.

221 BC vs 1947?? Who is older? Can you count?
In 221 BC Qin Shi Huang created the first Chinese empire. China's last dynasty ended in 1911. Republic of China was created in 1912 and People's Republic of China in 1949.

If you're truly interested in real history, History of China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you're not, do not derail this thread.


Pakistan was under the name 'INDIA' but before independence it was ruled by local kings.

logically it was part of 'united India' and factually it is not.

Before independence, it was all British. Prior to British, there were many empires. So logically Pakistan was never part of India, there was no single empire named India.
 
Last edited:
No, you missed the crux of the whole matter. The map is irrelevant to the fact that Tibet belongs to China back then, any treaty that is NOT rectified by China, naturally China will not recognized it. What's hard to understand?

again you lost it.how you can claim Tibet was part of China when they were independent enough to make a tripartite deal???even in 1914,Tibet was making tripartite deal with China and Britain,to decide what should be their future.how much they'll give to China or Britain and how much will remain under their Govt under the suzerainty.so how,you can claim Tibet was part of China???and China didn't deny to sign the accord due to the fact that Tibet was acting as independent entity,its the percentage of area they're getting,i.e.,what will be the actual boundary of Outer and Inner Tibet.so,its crystal clear that its China lying in front of whole world and they showed their real color in front of whole world through naked aggression.
 
Before independence, it was all British. Prior to British, there were many empires. So logically Pakistan was never part of India, there was no single empire named India.

Then why was Pakistan scraped out of our landmass?!

Muslims were minority in INDIA that is why they were given a separate land.

Iam talking in context of 'united India' the state when partition took place...pakistan was a part of India. Don't forget the part Lahore which is in Pakistan was once a partially hindu majority area. Radcliff just drew a line and cut western part of 'united India' and Great Bengal.
 
Tibet belonged to China since Qing. Anglo Chinese Treaty of 1907 recognized it.

which one was that???or its Anglo Russian Entente you mistakenly mentioned as its too discussed status on tibet and let Britain take the charge in that sector.as you know,Tibet was a seperate entity for long enough to sign several treaties with Nepal,Mongolia and others.even if you study Treaty of Chusul,which demarcated the boundaries of Tibet and Ladakh,its Tibet,Sikh Empire and Qing Dynasty was signatory.but after PRC came up,they declared that treaty "Null and Void"...read this...

Historical Dictionary of Tibet - John Powers, David Templeman - Google Books
 
again you lost it.how you can claim Tibet was part of China when they were independent enough to make a tripartite deal???even in 1914,Tibet was making tripartite deal with China and Britain,to decide what should be their future.how much they'll give to China or Britain and how much will remain under their Govt under the suzerainty.so how,you can claim Tibet was part of China???and China didn't deny to sign the accord due to the fact that Tibet was acting as independent entity,its the percentage of area they're getting,i.e.,what will be the actual boundary of Outer and Inner Tibet.so,its crystal clear that its China lying in front of whole world and they showed their real color in front of whole world through naked aggression.

Playing around with rhetoric doesn't win you argument, stating fact does.

Fact: British-Chinese treaty of 1907 recognized Tibet as China.

From 1911, the end of monarchy and civil war preoccupied China. Fraction within Tibet claimed independence, but Tibet was legally bounded by Qing abdication of the throne. Know anything about treaty law?

It is crystal clear that UN and the entire world recognized Tibet as CHina, including India.
 
The Empire created by Qin Shi Huang only existed for 6 years.

6 years? are you intellectually sound? Stop your dumb trolling, Are you going to continue derailing this thread?
 
Last edited:
Whereas China building roads in P0K and declaring identification zone near disputed islands. Hypocrites.
 
Back
Top Bottom