Are you expected us to attack Indian and let Indian gorverment cries like a little girl to the west for help or to UN to get the condamnation on China?..this remind me of a little kid said to an adult "slap me if you dare, what you're waiting for?"...LMAO.
So much bullshit in one post.An idiot with delusions of superpowerdom lecturing others about qualifications,by all means let discuss PPP vs Nominal.In fact,the whole world must be unqualified by your logic that it doesn't use PPP instead of nominal.Now the great Indian economist knows more than the rest of the world combinedReally??
I asked you about your qualifications.Let we see it then we can talk about PPP rate and its merits and demerits.
Ha
Look man .I spend a lot of time to study the history because that was one my favourite hobby at leisure time.So dont try to argue with me unless you want an embarrassment.
Then again I am talking to a 50 cent.
After the Tibetan uprising we helped Dalai Lama ,CIA recruited by Tibetans and trained them under Special Activities Division and protected Dalai Lama until Indian border. Chinese dont like our support to Lama and attacked illtrained ,illequipped army posts in huge numbers.
And they choose Cuban Missile Crisis for this.
Nehru inititially seeked Soviet help but they didnt help us.
Then US came for our help but we didnt trust US that much and limited their presence .
What do you know about Cuban Missile Crisis? It was one of the most anxious time in 20th century and USSR isolated internationallly only Chinese was their to help them.
USSR didnt heard our plea because they had need Chinese diplomatic support during Missile crisis.
Absence of such strings enabled USSR to help us in 1971 by even deploy Red Army in Chinese border.
About Your last para BS.If it is the case then I should say PRC is the real impotent because their Southern Tibet is in our hand.Developing it,Investing in it .They cant do nothing about it.
Yeah right and China's economy was smaller than India until 90s..so basically India had started it reforms when India and China were neck to neck,now India is a midget compared to China and the gap is widening every year.They add an India into their gdp every couple of years and you dream of competing with China.
So much bullshit in one post.An idiot with delusions of superpowerdom lecturing others about qualifications,by all means let discuss PPP vs Nominal.In fact,the whole world must be unqualified by your logic that it doesn't use PPP instead of nominal.Now the great Indian economist knows more than the rest of the world combined
You are a man of poor intellect if you don't even know the history of your own country,even after spending or claiming to spend so much time on it.
Why did my last para hurt the ego about unchallenged India and its power?Really hit home didn't it?
Oh boy
If PPP was not good for economic study then why did the international organistation consider PPP for tabulating statistics ?Give me a Convincing answer then we can talk about it.
What do you know about PPP?
I know now you cant swallow your claims and arguements .Bitter isnt it?
I know a lot about our nations history ,50 cent tratiors would have their own limitations.Giveme a single credible point that can cut my claims about 1962.Then we can talk about your knowledge about history.
In last para you put up a stupid comparison ,now you realized that it was a mistake because you posted that stupidity without even consider there was a possibility that I posted there.
Sigh,again the ignorance of a naive Indian..PPP is an alternate measurement and that is just that.It's just a measure to show the price difference of different countries.In your simple minded views,you have conveniently ignored or can't see why all institutions use nominal and not PPP to measure countries.
dear abbotani...please read this to enhance your knowledge on ppp
US assistance was a bit too late.
Sigh,what else did I say?PPP is a measure of the price difference between different countries or to dumb it down for you and sreekumar,how much a dollar goes or buys in different countries.
Who is ranting here?the person claiming ppp is an accurate measure for comparing countries over nominal basis or a person who has no idea of his own history or the fact that till the end of 80s CHina was behind India in gdp and claims that India and CHina were same in gdp.Or 'I dont have any thing in my empty arsenal'
You should reply like that.Different nations have different price structure and life expense wjthin their nation.So purchasing power of citizens in different nations would vary drastically.
Internay Indias growth is much strong or India is domestically consumption driven economy not an export oriented economy like China.So there would be some lagging in our nomunal GDP.
The points I stated have essential proven links and back up.But you countered it without any base or counter it for the sake of countering.Or more like ranting.
I have enough knowledge in history ,technology and lot of otber subject.By supporting China with some baseless boasting, you are even embarrassed Chinese and even yourself.
chinese education..cheap without warrenty.....IMF is dumb as per your say....ppp exchange rate are relatively reliable and stable over time.bycontrast market rate are more volatile and using themcould produce large scale swing in agreegate measure of growth even growthrate of individual countries are stable.market based rates are only relevant incase of internationally traded goods.No traded goods n service are tend to be cheaper lower income countries than high income countries.
