Madni Bappa
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2022
- Messages
- 792
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
I think it was a high stakes bet against Russia and Russia called the West's bluff.Thanks. I have been watching this guy and he is quite good. It gels with what you and I have been saying too. However, the Russians have quickly adapted to the changing ground and international situation. Senile Biden has just made a very luke warm reference to Ukraine and lack of US involvement. The simple economic and geographical FACT is that that sending troops into Ukraine is simply not in America’s national interest. Ukraine is not an ally, but it’s on a different Eurasian continent, it’s not a major trading partner, and there’s little strategic benefit for the US, which does not even have an army base on Ukrainian soil. The Russians know it too and will prevail.
I know they keep parroting the opposite sentence with the word bluff in their media. But I believe what I said to be true.
Think they should test some loitering munitions as well.
At this point you lot should suggest them to try some NATO troops too. Since y'all feeling so much for Ukraine.Well, I was thinking more along the line for collecting combat data for those new drone, they can even let USAF or RAAF operate it from the US or Australia just paint them with Ukrainian marking. I mean, a few of those drone don't cost as much as a F-16V (Boeing was doing them $115 mil for 6 Drones) , and combat data probably more valuable than that. And how often do you see how you stuff match with Russian Military?
But Yes, for general use, used MQ-1 would be sufficient, think we have a lot of those lying around after pulling out of Afghanistan. Just let the Ukrainian take it.