Jackdaws
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Messages
- 13,114
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
Shocking statement by you.As usual, the indians have 0 evidence for ALL the claims they are making...........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shocking statement by you.As usual, the indians have 0 evidence for ALL the claims they are making...........
Howdy mowdyWhy is this Indian trying to look like a cowboy?
Actually invading with 12.7× more troops than we had. Also, we were lightly armed in bangladesh. indians and bangladeshis were not.
That guy had class.He looks more and more like that Kingfisher owner every day.
"We"?Lame excuse .... Why we were lightly armed in B'desh? was that part less important to us than W.Pakistan?...they still have much larger army than us are we going to use same excuse again?
Didn't need American support then. Don't need it now.
Yawn. And you had support of USA. SEATO.CENTO. Now didn't deny that not a single Soviet troop was ever needed to assuage your crestfallen ego. IYes you got Russian support at that time now only difference is change of India masters. Don't come back with pathetic mumbo jumbo as Russians did supported you and there naval forces were operating just outside our waters and their AWAC's were flying on our western borders to give IAF intelligence. So all bravo and farting won't change the basic facts.
So the mob didn't attack the Indian Wing Commander till he had a gun in his hand? And only then had the guts to approach him?Interesting. By what ratio was he out numbered? 500-1?"My name is Wing Commander Abhinandan, and I surrender"