PM Imran Khan vs Opposition No Confidence Vote- Updates and Discussion

[Areesh]

you two chaps help me with something. wasn't this guy whom you quoted so sure that the vnc will be won by PDM?

Yes he was. Like every noon league supporter

 

[Verve]

lol ... SC judges will see this .. let's see if the judges are stupid enough to go against the stamp by NSC confirming the foreign hand in NCV.

 

[Meengla]

There'll likely be another thread once we heard something from the SC.

I agree, even if the opposition had won the vote, the best outcome would have been an announcement of elections in 90 days. It's really perfect timing.

Opposition would not have wanted early elections after winning the NCV. Why would they?? They just spent a gazillion buying the MNAs and would work to recuperate some of the costs over the next 1+ years!
Imran Khan missed the boat on the early elections. I don't think he realized the betrayal done to him and by the time he realized the game was over for him.

اب سپریم کورٹ کا پارلیمنٹ سے کیا لینا دینا 3 دن پہلے تو یہ جج کہتے تھے ہمارا پارلیمانی امور میں کوئی لینا دینا نہیں ۔

No my friend. You got the wrong idea. Supreme Court has always taken actions about parliamentary matters, going as far back as Justice Munir's pivotal decision decades ago and many more since then.

 

[Longhorn]

Today, probably for the first time, the Pakistani people won.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

ARTICLE 69 from Constitution of Pakistan

69	Courts not to inquire into proceedings of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament). (1) The validity of any proceedings in 168[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 168 shall not be called in question on the ground of any irregularity of procedure. (2) No officer or member of 169[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 169 in whom powers are vested by or under the Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order in 170[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 170, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers. (3) In this Article, 171[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 171 has the same meaning as in Article 66.

Simple English
Courts cannot intervene in the Proceedings of Parliament , under no circumstances , "the Proceeding" is fully decided in session of Parliament

The decision take by Parliament was Pakistan is under grave danger based on National Security Council , discussion attended by all the Security Heads of Pakistan



The Speaker of Assembly reviewed the Evidence
Evidence
(Substantiation of Proof of Danger and grave danger)

1- Pakistan attacked by Super Sonic missile from India

2- Foreign Country's threat against Pakistan , a formal letter was attained by Pakistani Government , on record discussion with full minutes. Physical proof of Letter of threat. The threat openly mentioned , the Government will be toppled by foreign Entity's blessing

3- Various politicians changing alliance against the Political Party's internal memo (breaking law of individual party)

4- Attack by JUI-F militia on Property of Pakistan

5- News of Physical harm threat against head of state of Pakistan

6- Threat by Sindh's Political Party Chair (Bilawal) against State of Pakistan and Government of Pakistan that they won't be allowed to host OIC organization Summit in Pakistan (On Record video evidence)


Reference

Imran Khan summons National Security Council meeting

Imran Khan has summoned a meeting of the National Security Council (NSC) on Thursday, Pak Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry said, Dawn reported.

www.thestatesman.com

National Security Council's Job was to invite all the Military Leadership Intelligence Heads , Civilian Security heads , Members of Government to Understand the security threat and validate the content of the Letter
of Threat against state of Pakistan

 

[Path-Finder]

@PanzerKiel is that was you hinting yesterday

?

 

[cranwerkhan]

I do not understand why IK did not kick out bajwa ?

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

So Imran Khan was right when he said that he will fight till the last ball of the match and he has a surprise for the opposition.

 

[Longhorn]

Can someone please respond to this lone Patwari pulling his hair out and mourning for Mian saanp

Thori burnol laga do.

 

[Jungibaaz]

ARTICLE 69 from Constitution of Pakistan

View attachment 830115

68	Restriction on discussion in Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament). No discussion shall take place in 167[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 167 with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.
69	Courts not to inquire into proceedings of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament). (1) The validity of any proceedings in 168[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 168 shall not be called in question on the ground of any irregularity of procedure. (2) No officer or member of 169[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 169 in whom powers are vested by or under the Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order in 170[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 170, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers. (3) In this Article, 171[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 171 has the same meaning as in Article 66.

Simple English
Courts cannot intervene in the Proceedings of Parliament , under no circumstances

Courts don't intervene in parliamentary matters where they have no cause for jurisdiction, but IF the constitution is deemed to be violated, they have jurisdiction anywhere and everywhere. Let's see what they say, but if they conclude that this move was unconstitutional, they will have full jurisdiction on this particular parliamentary matter.

 

[Path-Finder]

can someone post shots of vediq media?

 

[PakSarZameen47]

@PanzerKiel is that was you hinting yesterday

Surprise

 

[coffee_cup]

ARTICLE 69 from Constitution of Pakistan

View attachment 830115

69	Courts not to inquire into proceedings of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament). (1) The validity of any proceedings in 168[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 168 shall not be called in question on the ground of any irregularity of procedure. (2) No officer or member of 169[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 169 in whom powers are vested by or under the Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order in 170[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 170, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers. (3) In this Article, 171[Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] 171 has the same meaning as in Article 66.

Simple English
Courts cannot intervene in the Proceedings of Parliament , under no circumstances

With our courts there is nothing impossible. Bhai jaan, app jitnay marzi article lay aeiN.


Just check how the judge against the law given bail to SS even when he himself was not present in the court. Now read all the articles you wish, but the hard reality on ground is far from ideal!

 

[cocomo]

https://www.reddit.com/r/pakistan/comments/tv600i

 

[El Sidd]

With our courts there is nothing impossible. Bhai jaan, app jitnay marzi article lay aeiN.


Just check how the judge against the law given bail to SS even when he himself was not present in the court. Now read all the articles you wish, but the hard reality on ground is far from ideal!

So Venezuelan model? Attacking courts and judiciary.

That's straight from foreign interference handbook as well.