What's new

PLAAF analysis Over Ladakh

Agni missiles exist in PPT form only. They are imaginary like the tooth fairy.

They have some working now but last year another testing of some ballistic missiles failed which India already put into service aiya. How these guys put something into service only after testing two times and then during service failed its trial when less than 5 times this thing has been tested. Most Agni missiles have yet to reach ranges which China achieved in 1970s and 1980s for long range ones and short range accuracy and warhead yields are so low they are like 1940s German V2 technology or very early Russian Scud missile levels. So embarrassing. Their submarine "ballistic missiles" have less range than some Chinese high school kid's projects :woot:

I think it's a shame their politicians talk so much and deliver to their civilization so little.

They have not even made Nirbhay successful and China's had its first cruise missile Silkworm HY/SY/FL series cruise missiles in service by 1980. Now China's had since more than three generations of anti-ship cruise missiles and air to surface ones and at least two generations of land attack and surface to surface super long range types.

The only threatening Indian missile is brahmos but even that they don't have thousands of and we have so much better YJ series which are similar in performance to brahmos. Hypersonics are even better. Brahmos can be intercepted using layers of S-400, HQ-9B, S-300PMU, HQ-22, HQ-16B, HQ-17, HQ,12, HQ-7, LD-2000. They think Brahmos stands a chance against almost nine layers of air defence for most important protected sites? Before our hypersonic DF-100 annihilates everything they have?
 
Last edited:
Oh well, what a piece of crap again! :hitwall::crazy:


ITS nothing like the menancing ARMADA of Air power being portrayed here in PDF

I believe the 160 PLAAF fighters

The most funny part is: while at the one side you downplay PLAAF numbers in order to let them look weak and the IAF almighty you are constantly spreading the fear for these "red hordes"! In a certain way that does not fit ... so either these small numbers of old PLAAF types are much more dangerous than you portray them or the IAF is simply not taht almighty?



PLAAF has over 40 flankers & 300 J10 but 70% of these are needed in SCS against USN japan Taiwan.

AND THE TIBET air bases cant cater for bigger numbers

:rofl:

Another epic fail ... since when does the PLAAF needs 70% of their assets in the SCS?
Did you ever check which bases are used in which TC and what aircraft are based at which numbers??

Sorry, but such posts are only a lame pathetic attempt and representative to the huge gap between the Indian self-perception and reality.
 
50?

who told you that?

Any hard evidence or is just another Surrender Modi story?




Yes they believe it.. as they think their sub trained mal nourish soldiers are good..

dude they are so ridiculous I once recall Indians telling a Swedish engineer that India has world best engineering ..

they question then turn to me “ask this Pakii.”

And I said... Sweden I think - volvo, gripen jets , IKEA etc

Indian engineering i think - Padmini premier ( Italian Licence built fiat), LCA that even after 20+ years still no where etc


Lol


So Indians just think they are superior but reality it is the opposite



They are the world's best when it comes to extreme lies and bs.
 
They have some working now but last year another testing of some ballistic missiles failed which India already put into service aiya. How these guys put something into service only after testing two times and then during service failed its trial when less than 5 times this thing has been tested. Most Agni missiles have yet to reach ranges which China achieved in 1970s and 1980s for long range ones and short range accuracy and warhead yields are so low they are like 1940s German V2 technology or very early Russian Scud missile levels. So embarrassing. Their submarine "ballistic missiles" have less range than some Chinese high school kid's projects :woot:

I think it's a shame their politicians talk so much and deliver to their civilization so little.

They have not even made Nirbhay successful and China's had its first cruise missile Silkworm HY/SY/FL series cruise missiles in service by 1980. Now China's had since more than three generations of anti-ship cruise missiles and air to surface ones and at least two generations of land attack and surface to surface super long range types.

The only threatening Indian missile is brahmos but even that they don't have thousands of and we have so much better YJ series which are similar in performance to brahmos. Hypersonics are even better. Brahmos can be intercepted using layers of S-400, HQ-9B, S-300PMU, HQ-22, HQ-16B, HQ-17, HQ,12, HQ-7, LD-2000. They think Brahmos stands a chance against almost nine layers of air defence for most important protected sites? Before our hypersonic DF-100 annihilates everything they have?
Brahmos is a Russian missile. They just assemble them.
 
USA Russia will not allow s ganging up on India. To redraw maps and borders.

Either they will get involved especially USA threatening Pakistan or massive military assistance which is already happening as we speak..

So this delusional no sense Pakistan can get involved at wimp is just fantasy .

South East Asian nations are already preparing with USA for increased military engagement as they too feel future threats
3 usa nuclear carries are in scs
India's map has been redrawn already when you were asleep, only that Modi govt has not told the indian population so far because of fear of backlash.
 
The title is miss leading. I thought that this is about the conflict analysis from PLAAF point of view, but actually an amateur youtube video.
 
Russia has abandoned India.
Indias obviously like to overplay their relation they believe to have with Russia for the sake of proapganda and pride, but before that are completely delusional about their actual relation with Russia. Russia was never really on Indias "side", not even during past hostilities between Soviets and China. Russians rarely even go as far as asserting such a relationship as political lipservice to Indians.

Contemporay Russian Chinese cooperation and ties after making fact on the grount (or in the air and oceans) are in all aspect superior to Russian Indian cooperation.

One of the more apparent angles is that Indian always has and still heavily depends on Russian arms and tech transfer. Russia gladly has been selling to India with less conditions and historically at a more affordable price for Indian standards than the "West". India spends large sums on Russian imports for its weight. Of course they dont want to see it as depending on Russia and prefer to dub it cooperation. Russias portfolio however is dominated by gas and oil exports and other countries. Indian arms exports are, while not completely insignificant, far from detremential to Russia. When Indians talk about their imports from Russia they act like its somwhere betwen 10-20% and higher. But in fact Indias arms export do not even amount to 1% of Russias exports. Indias total imports from Russia do not even amount to as much as 2%. Thats how little India actually matters. Indians are eager to argue that "Russia wont give up India for China" from an economical standpoint, yet its actually China feeding Russias economy at the very top with nearly 15% of Russias exports.

One of the less obvious angles is that Russia was and still remains a major political and military power that faces off with the "Western" dubbed U.S. power block which always had an edge over Russia. Just for that alone Russia has reason to reach out a hand to any country and counterbalance the U.S. and lackeys and pull countries out of their sphere. However that is not something exclusive to India. They had been aproaching China for same reasons. Indians completely missunderstand that as being choosen by Russia for its own value.

Then there is the angle that India is just a third rate hardly developed country with little capabilities to project power even within 100% of their own perceived borders. India is absolutely no threat to Russia. They dont need to be warry about them other than India selling out Russia to the U.S. so might as well play nice. In reverse China is a politicaland military peer contender and economically overall already far ahead of Russia at this point. All other factors aside this should give India preferential position as a third party between two major powers. Yet despite that cooperation with China is much stronger and more indept than with India in face of the U.S.A. and India is left behind due to its insignificance. Yet Indians can only look up to the U.S.A and can see China only as an enemy. There is no place in their imagination for an Russian-China alliance. China and Pakistan in their mind are the big evil devil, the enemy. Russia their friend. It just wont compute in their heads, no matter what.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom