What's new

Pictures of Imran Khan’s Alleged Daughter Have Stirred a Massive Debate on Social Media

Let me make it short and simple.

I am not pro or anti when it comes to Sadiq and Ameen constitution. But you are missing the points once again.

The evidences were overwhelming against Nawaz Sharif but not Zardari. Even with those policy that had been there since late 80s i presume, tinkering with that policy right after that policy had been used which just dissolved Nawaz Sharif as PM of Pakistan can be seen as selective or systematic attack [democracy]. So that policy is here to stay for the sake of stability since democratic politic is already vulnerable as it is.

The policy can work as long as there is concrete evidence that can be overwhelming against those figures that contests at the election as federal government of Pakistan.
U missed it again. My argument is against the system. I'm pointing out that the system is not working effectively. It let slip Zardari and caught Nawaz Sharif(at the very end and not on corruption charges but rather him not disclosing all his property). A system that works properly would catch anyone that's corrupt. Idk what u r talking about not enough evidence against Zardari. There was tons of evidence even before he became the president. Just google Mr. 10 percent
 
Last edited:
.
Than it proves adlia is corrupt and so are blind followers of IK.
They should start look into every one private life? Then u will first one to cry.

Or we can hand over the country to Piggy Sharif to rape it from all parts.


IK is best option we got and he will be next PM. Rok saktay hoto rok lo:partay:

I personally don't care about old people but I'm absolutely sure that IK can't change anything because there's no transparency in current system of governance nor within PTI.
A person who use black berry, surely is a risk to state.
Yeh risk? NS is Jinah or Zardari is bhutto? Rok saktay ho to rok lo
 
. .
U missed it again. My argument is against the system. I'm pointing out that the system is not working effectively. It let slip Zardari and caught Nawaz Sharif(at the very end and not on corruption charges but rather him not disclosing all his property). A system that works properly would catch anyone that's corrupt. Idk what u r talking about not enough evidence against Zardari. There was tons of evidence even before he became the president. Just google Mr. 10 percent

There's tons of evidence against Zardari, Gillani, Faryal talpur.... however, system is Pakistan depends on bureaucrats who are as corrupt as politicians.
 
.
U missed it again. My argument is against the system. I'm pointing out that the system is not working effectively. It let slip Zardari and caught Nawaz Sharif(at the very end and not on corruption charges but rather him not disclosing all his property). A system that works properly would catch anyone that's corrupt. Idk what u r talking about not enough evidence against Zardari. There was tons of evidence even before he became the president. Just google Mr. 10 percent

Of course there has been inconsistency in the system but it is still too late to tinker the policy right after that policy just got Nawaz Sharif disqualified from the leadership over Pakistan.

Tons of evidences? 10 percent? It sounds great for discussion but those concrete evidences, presumably so, are yet to be submitted in the court to disqualify Zardari. It is more to do with the lack of evidence or yet to submit those evidences to the court than the system despite being inconsistent and selective.
 
.
This guy is unpredictable either he will deliver us into hands of powers who wish to see us destroyed and balkanized.

We all have seen how CIA prepared trap to put Egypt in to self destruction mode in the name of democracy... people got deceived but than they step back quickly from their support to system which brought Egypt to brink of civil war.

I see no plans, no road map from PTI, they seem to have no policy, apparently IK is dominant to decide what goes around.
 
.
Of course there has been inconsistency in the system but it is still too late to tinker the policy right after that policy just got Nawaz Sharif disqualified from the leadership over Pakistan.

Tons of evidences? 10 percent? It sounds great for discussion but those concrete evidences, presumably so, are yet to be submitted in the court to disqualify Zardari. It is more to do with the lack of evidence or yet to submit those evidences to the court than the system despite being inconsistent and selective.
It has nothing to do with the evidence not being there. It has everything to do with ppl being sell outs. Remember the time when the Supreme Court tried to get the prime minister to write a letter to the Swiss government? And what did he do he instead chose to lose his seat as the prime minister. If Zardari was super innocent then there was no reason not to write the letter. The Pakistani government can write a letter to the Swiss government and investigate me and my assets all they want...bcuz I got nothing to hide. Then Zardari should do the same if he is innocent.
 
.
I am surprised that PMLN is yet to take Imran Khan to the court for that considering they wasted their time following the money trail which could be easily covered through Jemima Khan.

PMLN are either jack asses, who even failed to convict zardari or perhaps some common brain is guiding all political leaders of Pakistan and this common brain doesn't want IK out of Pakistani politics.
 
.
It has nothing to do with the evidence not being there. It has everything to do with ppl being sell outs. Remember the time when the Supreme Court tried to get the prime minister to write a letter to the Swiss government? And what did he do he instead chose to lose his seat as the prime minister. If Zardari was super innocent then there was no reason not to write the letter. The Pakistani government can write a letter to the Swiss government and investigate me and my assets all they want...bcuz I got nothing to hide. Then Zardari should do the same if he is innocent.

I can understand but at the end, the court functions on the concrete evidence which is basis of the justice system even if Sadiq/Ameen const. is applied or not.
 
.
I can understand but at the end, the court functions on the concrete evidence which is basis of the justice system even if Sadiq/Ameen const. is applied or not.
It's not just the courts...what do u think NAB exists for? And what has NAB done so far to catch corruption? The only time it did some action was fairly recently during Nawaz government. In a normal democracy the courts hardly get involved in catching politicians for their actions.
 
.
It's not just the courts...what do u think NAB exists for? And what has NAB done so far to catch corruption? The only time it did some action was fairly recently during Nawaz government. In a normal democracy the courts hardly get involved in catching politicians for their actions.

Because the court's job is to make the judgement based on the finding [evidences]. Now that is up to the lawyers that provides evidence available in the court. So that depends on the source of the origin [evidences] that the lawyers gathered to provide in the court.
 
.
Because the court's job is to make the judgement based on the finding [evidences]. Now that is up to the lawyers that provides evidence available in the court. So that depends on the source of the origin [evidences] that the lawyers gathered to provide in the court.
Why r u discussing how a court works. I know how a court works. R u still not getting what I said? I said the system(as in the whole thing) isn't working properly.
 
.
Why r u discussing how a court works. I know how a court works. R u still not getting what I said? I said the system(as in the whole thing) isn't working properly.

You are mixing the both. And i am separating the role for each individual for clarity. The court job is to make judgement based on the findings whereas for lawyers are evidence to deliver. And your main concern should be origin of the source [evidence]. Where do the lawyer gather the evidences from? Is it their works or third-party [main establishment or rivals]?

At the end, it is concrete evidence that makes final call. If the overwhelming evidences are against you even in the already rigged game, then be it selective or systematic, the case is already over regardless of the game that is rigged or not.

That being said, the game is open for all. There is no stopping from democratic political party to file the case against the main establishment. It is different that not many dare to challenge the main establishment in the court never mind the main establishment's lackey, Imran Khan. :D
 
.
You are mixing the both. And i am separating the role for each individual for clarity. The court job is to make judgement based on the findings whereas for lawyers are evidence to deliver. And your main concern should be origin of the source [evidence]. Where do the lawyer gather the evidences from? Is it their works or third-party [main establishment or rivals]?

At the end, it is concrete evidence that makes final call. If the overwhelming evidences are against you even in the already rigged game, then be it selective or systematic, the case is already over regardless of the game that is rigged or not.

That being said, the game is open for all. There is no stopping from democratic political party to file the case against the main establishment. It is different that not many dare to challenge the main establishment in the court never mind the main establishment's lackey, Imran Khan. :D
I'm not mixing both. My main argument wasn't even about the courts. Again I would like to add that in a normal democracy courts aren't responsible for catching corruption. My main argument was that in Pak the system isn't working properly, it let slip many corrupt politicians. If u have anything to argue against that to show me that the system is working perfectly and NAB has been doing its job catching everyone who is corrupt then go ahead and quote me, presenting ur argument. Otherwise don't waste my time going on tangents.
 
.
leave it to Allah...he still much better then these present politicians. He admit all his weaknesses . But, human being is not ready to forgive and forget..... We need to stop worshiping corrupt politicians and do the honest judgement.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom