Cookie Monster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 3,975
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
U missed it again. My argument is against the system. I'm pointing out that the system is not working effectively. It let slip Zardari and caught Nawaz Sharif(at the very end and not on corruption charges but rather him not disclosing all his property). A system that works properly would catch anyone that's corrupt. Idk what u r talking about not enough evidence against Zardari. There was tons of evidence even before he became the president. Just google Mr. 10 percentLet me make it short and simple.
I am not pro or anti when it comes to Sadiq and Ameen constitution. But you are missing the points once again.
The evidences were overwhelming against Nawaz Sharif but not Zardari. Even with those policy that had been there since late 80s i presume, tinkering with that policy right after that policy had been used which just dissolved Nawaz Sharif as PM of Pakistan can be seen as selective or systematic attack [democracy]. So that policy is here to stay for the sake of stability since democratic politic is already vulnerable as it is.
The policy can work as long as there is concrete evidence that can be overwhelming against those figures that contests at the election as federal government of Pakistan.
Last edited: