Pervez Musharraf Exposing Indian Terrorist Kulbhushan Yadav & Indian Fake Victory Claim in Kargil

[Azadkashmir]

 

[Divergent]

Rightio

 

[American Pakistani]

Look at that anchor, does he fits to be one?

@Topic good slap on this nonsense anchor.

 

[Trango Towers]

musharaf.......with all his faults is a lion when it comes to pakistan.

reporter is dancing......musharaf looks like he doesn't even care with this ballerina is saying....very funny

 

[Mugwop]

Taliban in iran? 5:00 - 5:10 Is this guy for real? He managed to make a angry mushy chuckle
@SOHEIL @Serpentine

Evidence number one is his confession and evidence number 2 is his fake passport

 

[Musafir117]

Taliban in iran? 5:00 - 5:10 Is this guy for real? He managed to make a angry mushy chuckle
@SOHEIL @Serpentine

Evidence number one is his confession and evidence number 2 is his fake passport

Evidence 3 Uzair Baloch
Evidence 4 Ehsanullah
And more coming:

 

[Kedardel]

I really hate to see Indian media giving importance to an Old Dictator. He should be ignored royally if he could not arrested in India immediately on landing after Kargil when he became Dictator.
He said one thing International Conventions are violated regularly. Means India should violate International Conventions at will.
He sent 5000 odd Pakistani Soldiers to be butchered by Indian Army, at Cold Heights under constant artillery fire.
Anyways if he had been successful in Kargil then India would have opened another front on IB. Good for everyone that he lost Kargil.

 

[Mugwop]

I really hate to see Indian media giving importance to an Old Dictator. He should be ignored royally if he could not arrested in India immediately on landing after Kargil when he became Dictator.
He said one thing International Conventions are violated regularly. Means India should violate International Conventions at will.
He sent 5000 odd Pakistani Soldiers to be butchered by Indian Army, at Cold Heights under constant artillery fire.
Anyways if he had been successful in Kargil then India would have opened another front on IB. Good for everyone that he lost Kargil.

indian media is not giving him importance they are simply having a discussion.
He is right alot of nations have been violating international conventions.Whether you do it or not is up to you.
I have discussed kargil many times with indians and I won't go off topic here but there's 1 thing I'd like to say is that mushy showed others "not indians" he is a better strategist.

 

[Kedardel]

indian media is not giving him importance they are simply having a discussion.
He is right alot of nations have been violating international conventions.Whether you do it or not is up to you.
I have discussed kargil many times with indians and I won't go off topic here but there's 1 thing I'd like to say is that mushy showed others "not indians" he is a better strategist.

I dont rate him as a strategist.... things were going alright between India and Pakistan when he did that mischief..... It didnt achieve anything, rather created further mistrust.
But Musharaf did Pakistan good by getting lot of dollars in Pakistan whichever way but he was good for Pakistani economy.

 

[Jackdaws]

Lol. What a neutral source. Funny considering how Nawaz rushed to D.C. begging Clinton to bail Pakistan out.

 

[SHAH820]

I really hate to see Indian media giving importance to an Old Dictator. He should be ignored royally if he could not arrested in India immediately on landing after Kargil when he became Dictator.
He said one thing International Conventions are violated regularly. Means India should violate International Conventions at will.
He sent 5000 odd Pakistani Soldiers to be butchered by Indian Army, at Cold Heights under constant artillery fire.
Anyways if he had been successful in Kargil then India would have opened another front on IB. Good for everyone that he lost Kargil.

lol your army butchered by pakistanis 5,000 vs 30,000 still have more losses still unable to capture whole area even when we draw back our troops now tell me if you won why you sign 2003 LOC on your on area ?

 

[Kedardel]

lol your army butchered by pakistanis 5,000 vs 30,000 still have more losses still unable to capture whole area even when we draw back our troops now tell me if you won why you sign 2003 LOC on your on area ?

Sir are sure of what you are saying ?? Are you suggesting your Artillery was ineffective in Kargil ??
Lets not make it a Kargil Thread.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

I really hate to see Indian media giving importance to an Old Dictator. He should be ignored royally if he could not arrested in India immediately on landing after Kargil when he became Dictator.
He said one thing International Conventions are violated regularly. Means India should violate International Conventions at will.
He sent 5000 odd Pakistani Soldiers to be butchered by Indian Army, at Cold Heights under constant artillery fire.
Anyways if he had been successful in Kargil then India would have opened another front on IB. Good for everyone that he lost Kargil.

no intentions of starting a debate but indian army couldn't have because of it's strike corps involved in kargil and Pakistani plans to start 2 new fronts like kargil in kashmir.

LOSERS ALWAYS ACCUSES

the anchor did it many itime in the interview. When left with no answer went to surgical strike, then kargil blah bla

 

[tarrar]

Indian so called RAW funded journalist are acting like clowns.

Gen. Musharraf is a legend.

 

[Blacklight]

Evidence 3 Uzair Baloch
Evidence 4 Ehsanullah
And more coming:

Baba Ladla & Mullah Mansoor