People of Balochistan want freedom from Sardars: Muhabbat Khan Mari

[American Pakistani]

Look the Grandson of KHAN OF QALLAT on media telling how Balochistan joined Pakistan.

Hence PROVED it joined Pakistan at will.

 

[shuakataftab]

Baloch sardars , other politicians and establishment all of them are equally responsible for the current situation of Balochistan

 

[Super Falcon]

not only balochis also sindhis punjabis too from chaudhries and wadeeras

 

[rubyjackass]

The keyword being unselfish. None of these examples is selfless, which by the way is the correct word.

Too bad the people disagree with this

Note here that you have admitted Mujib was a Hindu Stooge. Otherwise, nothing of substance


Ah but they wanted to secede to Pakistan in 1947

Like I care

Freedom from its clerics? Are you utterly crazy? What clerics?

Nonsense rhetoric once again!

Ok baba, India freed Kashmir from Pakistan in 1947(I used clerics so that it sounds like India interfering in an internal issue). If you are hurt, add another point to the list. Pakistan tried to 'free' Kashmir from the king's forces(You will agree with this and it will match my criterion of meddling). Btw unselfish is also a legitimate word. I didn't want to use the same word twice in the post.
You seem to have missed the point. It's not about the details of each case. The details will depend on who you ask. It is irrelevant, whom the outsider selflessly 'freed' the people from. It is plain intervention to interfere in another people's affairs. And if it not for self-defence it's declared intention is always to 'help' and 'free' the people. The same way colonialists 'felt' it was their 'duty' to 'help' us(Read White man's burden). BTW Communists genuinely thought they were gifting the occupied people like Tibetans and Afghans with their ideology. A common American genuinely thinks he liberated the people of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

My only questions are: Why do you think you are better than them? Why do you think the people cannot help themselves?

 

[iPhone]

excellent post, dont agree with the death to india bit, though.

Sheikh Rasheed was on Kashif Abasi show today and part of interview/debate was Balochistaan. He said some great things. He goes, sir, Balochistan isn't going anywhere, I dont why we're making such a huge deal about it. There are over 100 sardars/Qebelas in Balochistan, two or three are in disagreement with the gov't, and even they can be talked to. Instead of going for branches, go for the root cause, i.e. improving the quality of life of the people living in the province. There was more to it but really good conversation.

 

[Zarvan]

Akbar Bugti for two times he was Baluchistan Chief Minister and one time Governor and also a defence Minister for some time leave Baluchistan aside even area of Bugti tribe didn't had any development that is what Sardars do there and still ignorant people support them

 

[Majnun]

This won't be mentioned in the Tribune.

 

[Zarvan]

not only balochis also sindhis punjabis too from chaudhries and wadeeras

Sir in Punjab Chaudhries are almost non existent main problem is Sardars in Baluchistan and Waderas of Sindh

 

[SSGPA1]

Excellent interview by Mr. Marri. Now it is up to the Pakistani media to promote this.

May I humble suggest that we post the news link on facebook and Twitter for prominent media persons?

 

[truthseer]

Ok baba, India freed Kashmir from Pakistan in 1947(I used clerics so that it sounds like India interfering in an internal issue). If you are hurt, add another point to the list. Pakistan tried to 'free' Kashmir from the king's forces(You will agree with this and it will match my criterion of meddling). Btw unselfish is also a legitimate word. I didn't want to use the same word twice in the post.
You seem to have missed the point. It's not about the details of each case. The details will depend on who you ask. It is irrelevant, whom the outsider selflessly 'freed' the people from. It is plain intervention to interfere in another people's affairs. And if it not for self-defence it's declared intention is always to 'help' and 'free' the people. The same way colonialists 'felt' it was their 'duty' to 'help' us(Read White man's burden). BTW Communists genuinely thought they were gifting the occupied people like Tibetans and Afghans with their ideology. A common American genuinely thinks he liberated the people of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

My only questions are: Why do you think you are better than them? Why do you think the people cannot help themselves?

India freed Kashmir from Pakistan, what nonsense is this. Kashmiris wanted one of two things
a) Join Pakistan
b) Remain independent

Now since b) was impossible, they chose a). And India didn't respect them

Also, they can't help themselves without weapons. So no, it's not that we think we're better

And the rest is nonsense which has nothing to do with the discussion, where'd communism come from?

 

[truthseer]

Shakespeare provided great source frm wiki now see those below links(same wiki source)

Political integration of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.defence.pk/forums/strategic-geopolitical-issues/160597-nyt-story-aug-15-1947-pak-recognized-independence-kalat-now-baloch.html

Professors??? I am scared

ok..... your point is kings created that mess.... then Pakistan bring referendum in Baluchistan and Sindh regions and people will decide their future. Charity should starts frm home.

At least I gave a source. If you check your post before mine, you gave none

As for the last para, why not do it yourself before barking up someone else's tree?

 

[Edevelop]

Did we just forget this guy? He is Balochi too you know. IK is trying to get him to join his party. Maybe this is a good move.

 

[53fd]

If the Express Tribune has any sense of intellectual honesty & integrity left, they'd post this article. But we know they won't.

 

[Deepak123]

Pakistan has a feudal society, Sardars of Balochistan are same like Zagirdars of Punjab and Waderas of Sindh. Give them development and they will never need to talk 1947-48 again because Balochistan main issue is the sense of deprivation. Even being most mineral rich province of Pakistan, they have lowest literacy and highest poverty rate in whole of Pakistan.

 

[Respect4Respect01]

Pakistan has a feudal society, Sardars of Balochistan are same like Zagirdars of Punjab and Waderas of Sindh. Give them development and they will never need to talk 1947-48 again because Balochistan main issue is the sense of deprivation. Even being most mineral rich province of Pakistan, they have lowest literacy and highest poverty rate in whole of Pakistan.

dude what do u think is the problem? these Jagirdars, Waderas, and Sardars are not letting us develop anything, they dont want people to get education so they can rule these illiterates forever.