What's new

Patel would have kept all Kashmir with India: Amit Shah

dropithard

BANNED

New Recruit

Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
90
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
India
BJP president Amit Shah said on Wednesday that all of Kashmir would have been under India’s control — with no need for Article 370 — if only Vallabhbhai Patel, and not Jawaharlal Nehru, had been in charge of the situation after independence.


“Even today, a big part of Kashmir is under Pakistan. I don’t have any hesitation in saying that if the Kashmir issue had been handled by Sardar Patel instead of Jawaharlal Nehru, then a part of Kashmir would not have gone under Pakistan, and Article 370 too would not have been required, because Kashmir would then have been like any other territory of India,” Shah said.
Tweets


There would also have been no question of UN intervention in Kashmir had Patel, who oversaw the unification of Hyderabad, had been in charge of assimilating Kashmir as well, he said.


The BJP president was speaking in the north Karnataka district of Bidar, at an event to mark the 66th anniversary of the unification of the former princely, Nizam-ruled province of Hyderabad with India. This was Shah’s first visit to Karnataka after taking charge of the BJP.
He laid the foundation for a statue of the Sardar and a “memorial to martyrs” in the tiny village of Gorta, which was formerly a part of the princely Hyderabad state. The BJP is building the memorial in memory of villagers who were killed, allegedly by the Nizam’s irregular army of Razakars, for raising the national flag in the village on May 9, 1948.

A few months later, Sardar Patel launched ‘Operation Polo’ against the Nizam, during which Indian forces defeated the Razakars and completed the annexation of Hyderabad.
The Sardar’s action prevented the alignment of Hyderabad with Pakistan, Shah said.

“If today this former Nizam state is part of India, the credit must go to Sardar Patel. It is because of his determination and his ability that we are all together, we have to always remember this,” Shah said. “On this day of liberation from the old Nizam state, I pay rich tributes to Sardar Patel on behalf of all countrymen.” And yet, Patel had died poor, and his family remained invisible in independent India — in sharp contrast to Nehru’s family, Shah said.


“Have you ever heard of the whereabouts of Sardar Patel’s family? Despite being a visionary and the unifier of India, the former advocate died with barely a few hundred rupees in his possession,” he said.


The princely state of Hyderabad was spread over parts of what are today Karnataka, Telangana and Maharashtra. The BJP under Shah seeks to use the narrative of the Gorta resistance in its campaign to expand its base in election bound Maharashtra, as well as in Telangana and Karnataka. Despite uncertain historical evidence, the BJP has labelled the alleged killings at Gorta the “Jallianwala Bagh of South India”. The “martyrs memorial”, scheduled to be inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on September 17, 2015, will cost Rs 27 lakh, contributed by young BJP workers from 54,000 polling booths in Karnataka.
 
. .
but today the BJP who speaks this do they have the right ?

do you know that

the Hindu Mahasabha ( great grandpa of BJP, grandpa - RSS, papa of BJP - jan sangh)

were responsible that sardar patel had to run to unite the 563 princly states

the congress demanded that the british give over the complete country

the hindu mahasabha said no and said since the british had taken over the states - the british should give back the states to the rulers / kings and if they wanted to join indian union then they can join

it the Great grandpa if BJP - the hindu mahasabha had not used such perverted logic - and gone by the cong demand

even then harisingh would not have got choice to remain independent and ther would not have been this mess

so along with nehru the BJP paentage is also to blame EQUALLY
 
. .
Indians get over it, people in Azad Kashmir and Gilget revolted and joined their **** brethren. WTF these people share with your kin? Stop behaving like genocidal maniacs and give IoKashmiris freedom they want.
 
.
it's actually interesting he is giving justification for article 370.
 
.
Indians get over it, people in Azad Kashmir and Gilget revolted and joined their **** brethren. WTF these people share with your kin? Stop behaving like genocidal maniacs and give IoKashmiris freedom they want.
pakistanis must give independence to baluchistan first, then came and talk about kashmir... pakistan is actually playing a double game. killing those people demand independence of balochistan and supporting terrorists for fight against india in kashmir and rest of india....
 
.
but today the BJP who speaks this do they have the right ?

do you know that

the Hindu Mahasabha ( great grandpa of BJP, grandpa - RSS, papa of BJP - jan sangh)

were responsible that sardar patel had to run to unite the 563 princly states

the congress demanded that the british give over the complete country

the hindu mahasabha said no and said since the british had taken over the states - the british should give back the states to the rulers / kings and if they wanted to join indian union then they can join

it the Great grandpa if BJP - the hindu mahasabha had not used such perverted logic - and gone by the cong demand

even then harisingh would not have got choice to remain independent and ther would not have been this mess

so along with nehru the BJP paentage is also to blame EQUALLY

sources my dear fellow ?
 
. . .
I think this is a completely wrong assessment of the whole Kashmir debacle.While Mountbatten admitted that Patel was less "tractable" than Nehru in terms of negotiating in Kashmir matter, this is wrong to assume that Patel was kept out from the entire scene, even after the widening split between him and Nehru. Kashmir after the second world war became the center for geo-strategic game of chess between Britain, shadow of a colonial power house and the Soviets, whose authority in the region became formidable after Europe was thrashed for a generation and Japan was struggling under atomic cloud.

If one carefully looks at several British documents, speeches and secret memorandums passed through this period it would be amply clear that the British did not want to sacrifice their strategic supremacy in the region which was on the verge of invasion by Communist manifestos. Granting the Soviets access to warm water of Persian gulf was beyond their imagination.So the region had to fall in the hand of an ally whom the British could trust blindly and India under the leadership of someone like Nehru who became a champion of socialism was not in their list of favorites.With the two armed forces thoroughly controlled by British officers there was little scope for India that it could move beyond Baramulla and Sadly, Patel could hardly do anything about it.
 
Last edited:
. .
Thank god you did not say "Papa Nehru" .........
Hahahahaha good 1 :rofl:

Nehru and his family are a disgrace to the nation. If (pandit my asss Nehru) had obeyed to make M.A Jinnah the first prime minister of India we would have been a bigger land mass. It was his hatred for Jinnah which ended in division of the country.
 
. .
kashmir wasmir sab batein hain baton ka kya..
Accept it pakistan has occupied 1/3 of kashmir and china also have some share there.
Indians can not get those parts by talk.
And you know very well war is not our choice.
I am an proud Indian but my proud get hurt when I think about kashmiri pundits what was congress doing at that time?
The original resident of kashmir are now in new delhi and rest of india.. But not in kashmir why??
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom