What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
You wait and see... the formation of this JIT may prove to be a greater blessing than the decisions of the two respected judges. If a majority disqualification judgement had come, NS would have been disqualified; now he'll not only be disqualified, he'll also be convicted, insha Allah, and many more thieves are going to be convicted. Just because a judge comments that these pieces of paper will be use to sell 'pakoras' on does not mean he's not going to do justice.
 
.
I think he knows NS does not have the documents that might clear him up.

Exactly, he knows.

All his statement implies is, as per the law, one cannot be forced to incriminate oneself.

Judges weren't asking for the documents that would have proved shreef family wrong.. They were saying, "you say you purchased the companies in 2006, then bring the registration documents to support your claim".. It doesn't imply that the accused is being asked to provide evidence that goes against him.

In the 'civilized countries', (as if we are aboriginies,) people have the right to remain silent and this right is read out to them at the time of arrest.

You are right about "at the time of arrest", not in front of the bench..
 
.
Lekin wording waqai confusing hai.. uss din jo main aur Emmie behes kar rahay thay, woh wording pe hi kar rahay thay.. Allah karay ke 5 ki bench hi faisla karay..

Waisy ek cheez ki confusion hai.. Kuch cheezin Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ne jab judgment di..ud waqt clear nahi theen..like who is the actual owner of those flats? Unhon ne criminal proceedings tu phir bhi start karnay ka keh diya tha...NAB main..against all..ke sab ko investigate karein..aur implementation bench ka bhi kaha tha.. But if after JIT reaches a definitive conclusion regd ownership of flats.. Tu kia Justice Khosa aur Gu,zar, apni judgement main addition karsaktay hain? Ke jis ke jhootay statements prove hojayein..us ke khilaf perjury ka case bana kar saza de dein? If Maryam Nawaz is proven liar..when she challenged those emails...agar woh emails sach sabit hojayein..tu us par mazeed judgment de dein. Because woh court order tu sab ki taraf se hi tha?
 
Last edited:
.
You wait and see... the formation of this JIT may prove to be a greater blessing than the decisions of the two respected judges. If a majority disqualification judgement had come, NS would have been disqualified; now he'll not only be disqualified, he'll also be convicted, insha Allah, and many more thieves are going to be convicted. Just because a judge comments that these pieces of paper will be use to sell 'pakoras' on does not mean he's not going to do justice.

Aap ke munh main ghee shakar.. Dawat meri taraf se saaray PDF ke doston ko uss din..
 
.
You wait and see... the formation of this JIT may prove to be a greater blessing than the decisions of the two respected judges. If a majority disqualification judgement had come, NS would have been disqualified; now he'll not only be disqualified, he'll also be convicted, insha Allah, and many more thieves are going to be convicted. Just because a judge comments that these pieces of paper will be use to sell 'pakoras' on does not mean he's not going to do justice.

Oho..theres some confusion...regd Justice Khosa and Gulzar's judgment... They have not only disqualified NS..but unke against criminal proceedings start karnay ka bhi kaha tha, aur unhon ne bhi implementation bench ka kaha tha.. Was listening to Fawad Ch yesterday.. He said ke JIT ki report ke baad yeh NAB main refrences bhej dein ge.. Jab ke Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ne JIT ka wait nahi kiya.. Direct hi NAB ko keh diya hai..aur Chairman NAB se saari powers bhi le lein hain, aur implementation bench banaany ka bhi keh diya tha.. They have gone step further in every thing from 3 judges @PakSword
 
.
Waisy ek cheez ki confusion hai.. Kuch cheezin Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ne jab judgment di..ud waqt clear nahi theen..like who is the actual owner of those flats? Unhon ne criminal proceedings tu phir bhi start karnay ka keh diya tha...NAB main..against all..ke sab ko investigate karein..aur implementation bench ka bhi kaha tha.. But if after JIT reaches a definitive conclusion regd ownership of flats.. Tu kia Justice Khosa aur Gu,zar, apni judgement main addition karsaktay hain? Ke jis ke jhootay statements prove hojayein..us ke khilaf perjury ka case bana kar saza de dein? If Maryam Nawaz is proven liar..when she challend those emails...agar woh sach sabit hojayein..tu us par mazeed judgment de dein. Because woh court tu sab ki taraf se hi tha?

Maryam ke khillaf case nahi ban sakta kyun ke woh uss waqt public office holder nahi thi..

Baqi, I don't think they will add anything and that's why they are not in the bench, because they have already reached to the conclusion.

Oho..theres some confusion...regd Justice Khosa and Gulzar's judgment... They have not only disqualified NS..but unke against criminal proceedings start karnay ka bhi kaha tha, aur unhon ne bhi implementation bench ka kaha tha.. Was listening to Fawad Ch yesterday.. He said ke JIT ki report ke baad yeh NAB main refrences bhej dein ge.. Jab ke Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ne JIT ka wait nahi kiya.. Direct hi NAB ko keh diya hai..aur Chairman NAB se saari powers bhi le lein hain, aur implementation bench banaany ka bhi keh diya tha.. They have gone step further in every thing from 3 judges @PakSword

And both of them are future chief justices of Pakistan.. @Boomin' Bomber I.J.
 
.
Maryam ke khillaf case nahi ban sakta kyun ke woh uss waqt public office holder nahi thi..

Baqi, I don't think they will add anything and that's why they are not in the bench, because they have already reached to the conclusion.
[/USER]

Public office holder honay ki tu is main koi baat hi nahi hai.. Jo bhi court main kisi bhi case main jhootay evidence ya statements dey.....uske .khilaf action hota hai.. So, if its proved tht Maryam Nawaz lied in the court earlier..tu iske khilaf court apni judgment de sakti hai na? So want to know..if Justice Khosa and Gulzar can make some additions in their judgment after JIT report?
 
.
Public office holder honay ki tu is main koi baat hi nahi hai.. Jo bhi court main jhootay evidence ya statements dey.....uske .khilaf action hota hai.. So, if its proved tht Maryam Nawaz lied in the court earlier..tu iske khilaf court apni judgment de sakti hai na? So want to know..if Justice Khosa and Gulzar can make some additions in their judgment after JIT report?

Woh tou wakeel se huee thi ghalti.. Maryam ne nahi kaha tha aisa bolnay ko..
 
.
Woh tou wakeel se huee thi ghalti.. Maryam ne nahi kaha tha aisa bolnay ko..

:lol::lol::lol: Waqayi advocate aur pakora tu yehi kahein ge..

Is liye main soch rahi thee ke Justice Khosa aur Gulzar apni judgment main addition karsaktay hian, after JIT report ya nahi? Lekin mera khyal hai ke aisa nahi hoga.. Unhon ne jo karna tha, kar liya... Bas ab unke vote count hi hojayein..is par hi humein shukr karna chahye.. Aur Klasra ki information se tu lagta hai ke inke vote count honge
 
.
:lol::lol::lol: Waqayi advocate aur pakora tu yehi kahein ge..

Is liye main soch rahi thee ke Justice Khosa aur Gulzar apni judgment main addition karsaktay hian, after JIT report ya nahi? Lekin mera khyal hai ke aisa nahi hoga.. Unhon ne jo karna tha, kar liya... Bas ab unke vote count hi hojayein..is par hi humein shukr karna chahye.. Aur Klasra ki information se tu lagta hai ke inke vote count honge

Lets see what happens. Hope this investigation changes the fate of Pakistan.
 
.
Lets see what happens. Hope this investigation changes the fate of Pakistan.

Investigation tu apna acha kaam kar ley gi lekin Advocate aur pakora judge zuroor humara maza kharab karnay ki koshish karein ge :cray::cray::cray::cray::cray::cray:
 
. . . .
Sirf 10 saal chahien, IK ki hukumat ke.. aur kafi kuchh sudhar jaega..

Hmm.. Allah karay ke aisa hi ho..lekin kiya IK..PM ban sakta hai, 2018 main?

Waisy IK ka foreign funding wala case garbar hai... Banigala aur flat ke money yrail walay case main tu clean chit mil jayegi, for sure..but am worroed abt foreign funding case.. Us main CJ ke remarks bhi kuch achay nahi aarahay.. Aaj PTI ne shayad court ki jurisdiction bhi challenge kar di hai, us main..tu CJ ne PTI ke lawyer se...kaha ke kia..aap ke arguments siyasi qadd kaath ke hisab se hain?
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom