Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[The Accountant]

I think the amount is in thousands of USD.. less than USD 5000. This is what Fawad Ch. was telling the other day. I will share the clip if I find it..

Ok but number of transactions should also be considered ...

Basically amount should be so small that it should have no impact on party decision making both for individual transaction and transactions as a whole

 

[PakSword]

Ok but number of transactions should also be considered ...

Basically amount should be so small that it should have no impact on party decision making both for individual transaction and transactions as a whole

Yes, both in terms of numbers and amounts, the transactions are insignificant, as per my knowledge..

 

[Inqlab-e-Pakistan]

ok guys jo initial Supplementary Cause list kal ki ayi hai us main to nahi aya abhi but ho sakta hai shaam tak ik aur cause list ah jaye still waiting mode.

 

[Dastaan]

I don't think that the amount (received from foreign institution/ nationals) is significant. ECP can't put a ban on the party. In my opinion (and as some other members also gave their opinion earlier), ECP will put some penalties on PTI and that's it.

ECP/ SC should have to look into this case in conjunction with other parties' companies incorporated abroad. So in order to avoid the chaos in future, where every party will file a petition against the other based on this judgment, I think judges will give some relaxation to PTI.. specially, when everything was already disclosed to ECP.

party par ban ya poori party ki DQ to petition main mangi hi nahi gai sirf IK ki DQ ki demand hai k IK nai jhoota affidavit EC main submit kiya hai is liya 62/63 lagaya jai.

 

[Strike!]

@PakSword

What are the chances the verdict is leaked again to Nawaz this time beforehand from SC server?

 

[PakSword]

party par ban ya poori party ki DQ to petition main mangi hi nahi gai sirf IK ki DQ ki demand hai k IK nai jhoota affidavit EC main submit kiya hai is liya 62/63 lagaya jai.

EC main shayad party par ban manga hai.. SC main IK ki DQ mangi hai..

 

[Farah Sohail]

I think SC has too much load on it right now.. Aaj tou CJ ne kaha bhi hai ke abb har MNA ke against petition direct SC main file horahi hai.. I think SC is too much involved in other cases. Tou yeh tou lamba chalay ga.. IB wala case..

CJ ko Imran Khan ke case main ye baat yaad nahi aayi..balke IK ka case tu dekay par delay kiye chalay jaarahay thay,..additional cheezein maang maang kar... Lagta nahi hi ke IK ka case suntay waqt inhein doosray cases ki koi fikr thee...

IB ke case ..mujhe tu lagta hai ke bhool gayi SC...loll...warna koi tu zikr hota.. I hope, i am wrong though

 

[PakSword]

@PakSword

What are the chances the verdict is leaked again to Nawaz this time beforehand from SC server?

They know what's coming.. No need to hack the computer this time.. Have you seen what Ashtar Ausaf is advising SC? That not to include any remarks that may affect the future proceedings on relevant forums?

It means he knows that there are some remarks with "Sadiq" and "Ameen" words in them, and relevant forum (read EC) will have to disqualify..

But if SC doesn't include finding about Sadiq and Ameen, there is still a chance to stretch the case in EC/ trial courts..

Also, Ashtar wants that SC doesn't include any adverse remarks on Maryam, so that her nomination papers aren't challenged in 2018 elections.

CJ ko Imran Khan ke case main ye baat yaad nahi aayi..balke IK ka case tu dekay par delay kiye chalay jaarahay thay,..additional cheezein maang maang kar... Lagta nahi hi ke IK ka case suntay waqt inhein doosray cases ki koi fikr thee...

IB ke case ..mujhe tu lagta hai ke bhool gayi SC...loll...warna koi tu zikr hota.. I hope, i am wrong though

I think everyone (including judges) are waiting for the Panama verdict so that once the Godfather is gone, sukoon ka saans leingi sari institutions..

Abhi tou agar IB ka case chalain bhi tou bhi kuchh nahi hoga.. sari institutions corrupt logon ko bachanay main lagi hain.

 

[Farah Sohail]

They know what's coming.. No need to hack the computer this time.. Have you seen what Ashtar Ausaf is advising SC? That not to include any remarks that may affect the future proceedings on relevant forums?

It means he knows that there are some remarks with "Sadiq" and "Ameen" words in them, and relevant forum (read EC) will have to disqualify..

But if SC doesn't include finding about Sadiq and Ameen, there is still a chance to stretch the case in EC/ trial courts..

Also, Ashtar wants that SC doesn't include any adverse remarks on Maryam, so that her nomination papers aren't challenged in 2018 elections.

.

Sadiq aur Ameen par koi remarks nahi..balke verdict aayega..agar aaya tu... EC will have no role in it.. SC will announce verdict, and EC ka kaam sirf de notify karna reh jayega... Woh is issue par case sunn nahi saktay.. Sirf SC ka order implement karna hoga EC ne.,,Like Justice Khosa and Gulzar disqualified PM.. Baqi bhi aisa hi karein ge..agar disqualify kia tu.. So there wont be any remarks only reg PM.. Maryam ke baaray main remakrs aasaktay hain, as she is not MNA or any public office holder.. Tu uske liye remarks aasaktay hain which make her ineligible for future... Baji par tu forgery ka case bhi chalay ga

 

[El Sidd]

wah re Qudrat

Mulk banaya Islam ke naam per
Islami rooh k tehat do article banaye gaye 62 or 63
bachpan se bachon ko sikhaya k Mohammad sadiq o amin
99 names me Allah k sifaat k do naam

or aj madinatul dom, pak sarzameen me is baat ki behas chirr gayi hai k kia ye loteray mafia 1857 ke bartaanvi ghulam dar ghulaam dar ghulaam, sadiq o amin hain.

qahar barpa kia naam e mohammad par. lalkaar rahi hai khalq e khuda sunnat e ilahi ko ke ya to nijaat dila de or tauba ki taufeeq de. ya apne asool pe qaim reh kr wohi kar jo Aad o Samood k sath kiya k ondhay pare reh jaeyn gharon me


Disclaimer: I did not write this

 

[PakSword]

Sadiq aur Ameen par koi remarks nahi..balke verdict aayega..agar aaya tu...

Haan wohi kehna chah raha tha main bhi.. ke Sadiq Aur Ameen wala verdict nahi hona chahiey.. abb yeh tou Ashtar Ausaf ki harkat hai.. pata nahi kis ki nokri karta hai.. state ki ya shareef khandaan ki.. ghatia aadmi..

 

[Farah Sohail]

Haan wohi kehna chah raha tha main bhi.. ke Sadiq Aur Ameen wala verdict nahi hona chahiey.. abb yeh tou Ashtar Ausaf ki harkat hai.. pata nahi kis ki nokri karta hai.. state ki ya shareef khandaan ki.. ghatia aadmi..

Obv sharif khandan ki karta hai... Zafar hijazi ki tarah

Nihal hashmi walay case main pakora judge ne remarks diye thay ke zuroori nahi ke attorney gen hi prosecutor ho.. Tu attorney gen ko us waqt hi change kiun nahi kardiya? Bs remarks denay aatay hain..us waqt hi change kar detay

Aur PML N leaders bhi agar case chalay tu kisi aur ko hi prosecutor lagayein

 

[Hyprion]

Haan wohi kehna chah raha tha main bhi.. ke Sadiq Aur Ameen wala verdict nahi hona chahiey.. abb yeh tou Ashtar Ausaf ki harkat hai.. pata nahi kis ki nokri karta hai.. state ki ya shareef khandaan ki.. ghatia aadmi..

Apko abhi bhi lagta h ye state ki nokri krta h ?
State se sirf tankha leta h. Jooty Nory ke chat'ta h.

 

[PakSword]

Obv sharif khandan ki karta hai... Zafar hijazi ki tarah

Nihal hashmi walay case main pakora judge ne remarks diye thay ke zuroori nahi ke attorney gen hi prosecutor ho.. Tu attorney gen ko us waqt hi change kiun nahi kardiya? Bs remarks denay aatay hain..us waqt hi change kar detay

Aur PML N leaders bhi agar case chalay tu kisi aur ko hi prosecutor lagayein

Attorney General ko hatanay ka procedure lamba hoga shayad.. Judges don't want to indulge in that?

Khair, aisa lagta hai, SC hi kaam karrahi hai poray Pakistan main..

 

[Farah Sohail]

Attorney General ko hatanay ka procedure lamba hoga shayad.. Judges don't want to indulge in that?

Khair, aisa lagta hai, SC hi kaam karrahi hai poray Pakistan main..

Quetta incident ..jis par commission banaa tha...ye wohi lawyers wala incident tha..jis main lawyers ki death hui thee? Us case ki hearing ab Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ka bench karraha hai Ab maza aayega..

https://twitter.com/x/status/890145727632084994

https://twitter.com/x/status/890145729108475907

https://twitter.com/x/status/890145742932914176

https://twitter.com/x/status/890148259825635328

https://twitter.com/x/status/890148346513559553