Badi-un-Nazar mein wohi conclusion draw hota hey jo aap ney kya.
Inside story is a little different and this is what I eluded to in my earlier post today.
To disqualify a PM (or any other), purely on the basis of 62 and 63 will set a bad judicial precedence.
The rulings of SC are not for an individual case.
They set standards, interpret constitution and then referenced for ever (For this reason no one references Bhutto's judgement in any judicial case).
In addition, 62 and 63 are "questionable" and "frowned upon" in the legal circles. These were introduced by Gen. Zia for his own motives.
Now! the reason judges have questioned, and did the same today, this 62 and 63 is because they want to use this constitutional case to interpret 62 and 63. This is a golden opportunity for the SC.
This is why judges are bringing this up again and again. They want to link 62 and 63 with UNDENIABLE proof (i.e., if there is a proof against an individual, of all wrong doings, then they should be disqualified under 62 and 63 - not without evidence, which was the motive of Gen Zia).