Pakistan's Service Rifle (G-3, Type-56) Replacement Competition 2016.

[Path-Finder]

According to guy that works in Zastava (i already mentioned him on this topic and shared some info that he provided on Serbian forum) in total score SCAR is behind Zastava.

you have given someone a Stroke @Zarvan

 

[farhan_9909]

According to guy that works in Zastava (i already mentioned him on this topic and shared some info that he provided on Serbian forum) in total score SCAR is behind Zastava.

Zastava and CZ Bren both are the best option because the come from the manufacture that in long run can help POF and will also provide full support in local production.

I really doubt that army will choose SCAR or ARX 200 as both of them are very expensive options

 

[thrilainmanila]

i hope its the scar but think it will be an AK derivative there simply isn't the money for anything better then the AK IMHO

 

[Zarvan]

you have given someone a Stroke @Zarvan

Zastasva is not even close to beat FN SCAR. @balixd Sir please any latest news ??

 

[Path-Finder]

Zastasva is not even close to beat FN SCAR. @balixd Sir please any latest news ??

Good Keep the faith.

 

[Zarvan]

Good Keep the faith.

I have been hearing about FN SCAR and AK-103 in final round. Although if these two Guns are in final round than I think we are going for both. One will replace G3 and other will replace Type 56.

 

[That Guy]

i hope its the scar but think it will be an AK derivative there simply isn't the money for anything better then the AK IMHO

rifles aren't like fighters or tanks, you can buy them in smaller batches and in longer terms.

 

[Thorough Pro]

LOL you just gave a 220 volt jolt to Zarvan

According to guy that works in Zastava (i already mentioned him on this topic and shared some info that he provided on Serbian forum) in total score SCAR is behind Zastava.

 

[Zarvan]

LOL you just gave a 220 volt jolt to Zarvan

ZASTAVA is no where close what I am hearing is AK-103 and FN SCAR in final round. But as both are different callibers some questions are raised.

 

[proka89]

I can't predict which rifle will win and be chosen in the end. I am just sharing info i heard from a guy that i know for sure is working in Zastava. There is always a chance that what he told us on Serbian forum is not true (but i can't really see what would that bring him). So it's up to you all to believe it or not. Zastava is competing only in 7.62x51 with M77 rifle.

 

[Wolfhound]

We don't use this caliber in our inventory ..

it is 5.45x39 mm

we are looking to replace gun for
7.62x51mm and 7.62x39mm caliber

Bhai jan i said series of rifles, The AK-109 comes in 7.62x39mm and fits the description perfectly.

 

[Zarvan]

I can't predict which rifle will win and be chosen in the end. I am just sharing info i heard from a guy that i know for sure is working in Zastava. There is always a chance that what he told us on Serbian forum is not true (but i can't really see what would that bring him). So it's up to you all to believe it or not. Zastava is competing only in 7.62x51 with M77 rifle.

Don't trust company guys. Every guy from various companies are claiming their Gun is leading the trials. But I am strictly against ZASTAVA and AK-103.

 

[Path-Finder]

Don't trust company guys. Every guy from various companies are claiming their Gun is leading the trials. But I am strictly against ZASTAVA and AK-103.

Zarvan Please don't become a cheer leader for SCAR you have nothing solid to back up your claim.

 

[Zarvan]

Zarvan Please don't become a cheer leader for SCAR you have nothing solid to back up your claim.

Everyone who researches on Gun knows Gun back my claim. SCAR without doubt is the best Battle Rifle. From range to accuracy to less recoil in every aspect SCAR is best.

 

[Path-Finder]

Everyone who researches on Gun knows Gun back my claim. SCAR without doubt is the best Battle Rifle. From range to accuracy to less recoil in every aspect SCAR is best.

Honestly FN should pay you for promoting their product so aggressively. This much devotion to rifle ought to be better spent else where.