What's new

Pakistan's foreign minister Bilawal Zardari humiliated himself in US

First true public appearance and everything else - he isn’t ready for this. Bhutto was polished well before he started doing these rounds - Zardari’s offspring has no exposure beyond protected public gatherings against people they consider slaves.
Here they are meeting seasoned state department personnel skilled in both negotiation skills and psychology. im surprised he didn’t just faint.
What do you expect? The man is a product of dynastic politics. Unfortunately, his mother's untimely death pushed him early into politics. He shouldn't be the leader of his party let alone FM. I was surprised there was no one more qualified they could have picked like Sherry Rehman.
 
View attachment 845452
Slaves will remain slaves....
I don't care much for any of the jokers in the entire Pakistani political landscape but childish posts and stupid threads like this are symptomatic of this absolute us vs. them mentality prevailing in Pakistan.

There are countless photos of IK with his hands folded, should one start making fun of those as well in a very childish manner?

Where does this end? Critique someone when they do something wrong. Respect someone when they represent your country without getting into petty partisanship.

Did IK not go to the US and present himself to Trump? Should we bring up those photos as well and start lampooning them?
 
Did IK not go to the US and present himself to Trump? Should we bring up those photos as well and start lampooning them?
Yes. Do you see a slave in the photos below or a genuine leader representing Pakistan?
B1008664-86F2-497F-81F1-63F662E9ED9D.jpeg
A22D6D1D-D25C-4A66-A51B-B5541BE2422A.jpeg
 
Is Bilawal trying to channel ran Khan ... Perhaps as a gay version of Imran Khan???


Trying to ride the IK wave of popularity???
he is continuing his policies, which is good for Pakistan
he could have done PMLN on us, but he didn't

why are yalll utterly negative about anything non-PTI
 
he is continuing his policies, which is good for Pakistan
he could have done PMLN on us, but he didn't

why are yalll utterly negative about anything non-PTI
Because Pakistan gave PPP and PMLN decades to rule since 1970 and this is the end result of their pro Pakistan policies
42590835-D71A-4E2D-9CD2-B44213BF08D3.jpeg
52D6673B-DBD2-4DC0-87D3-88BAB2ADC1F4.jpeg
 
He looks too nervous and completely out of his depth. It's actually really cringe watching this, Blinken must be thinking what have we invested in :lol:
They are treating him like when you meet a dead friend child.

Anyways he is depressed. He father said he suffers from depression and panic attacks. Looks at his hand. He is rubbing. That is first step towards mental illness.

He would recally meet a very bad end.
 
Yes. Do you see a slave in the photos below or a genuine leader representing Pakistan?View attachment 845949View attachment 845950
How immature can we get?

I can turn this logic around very simply by stating the fact that IK was in the US and that too in the WH is perhaps indicative of him/his government being a slave. Why did he not stick with Russia and China? Why did he have to go to the US? After all that is the whole gripe here with Bilawal Z. going to the US, right?

Second, grant the fact that he is a 70 year old man vs. comparing to a 33 year old young man. Age brings about experience, however young age and lack of confidence do not betray "slavery" as you are trying to paint here.

I still remember Shah Mehmood Qureshi's major screw-up on CNN when he idiotically presented himself as an anti-semite on a platter to the CNN reporter. So give people some rope. You don't then you and your side won't get much rope either. Petty insults and finger pointing by the other side is what I see ahead for IK and PTI as well given the current state of affairs.
 
Second, grant the fact that he is a 70 year old man vs. comparing to a 33 year old man. Age brings about experience, however young age and lack of confidence does not betray "slavery" as you are trying to paint this view.
Since you are defending Bilawal now, please also defend his statement in US where he says that Pakistan must not be "punished" because ex PM Imran Khan made a visit to Russia (against wishes of the US).
Is this signs of great diplomacy or slavery? Is this how foreign minister of a sovereign nation talks?
 
View attachment 845944

nation before internal squabbles
although I maintain he should never ever be the FM of Pakistan, its a key ministry along with finance minister
Which are the critical, the 'key' ministries, reporting to the Prime Minister?

Internal affairs/Home, External affairs/Foreign, Security/Defence, Finance.

How does a country fill these positions, and that of the PM? The profiles of the incumbents and their behaviour itself will give the observer clear insights into the character and integrity of that administration. This works for understanding India. It should work for understanding Pakistan.
 
Which are the critical, the 'key' ministries, reporting to the Prime Minister?

Internal affairs/Home, External affairs/Foreign, Security/Defence, Finance.

How does a country fill these positions, and that of the PM? The profiles of the incumbents and their behaviour itself will give the observer clear insights into the character and integrity of that administration. This works for understanding India. It should work for understanding Pakistan.
its not for 33 y/o young man
 
Since you are defending Bilawal now, please also defend his statement in US where he says that Pakistan must not be "punished" because ex PM Imran Khan made a visit to Russia (against wishes of the US).
Is this signs of great diplomacy or slavery? Is this how foreign minister of a sovereign nation talks?
Loyalty to his country, and integrity.

It was surprising that he took this stand, and defended his country's PM's actions, even if that PM was from a different party, and was an individual that he might have opposed firmly in the internal political situation in his country.

That apart, it is not the position for a young, untried incumbent.
 
Loyalty to his country, and integrity.

It was surprising that he took this stand, and defended his country's PM's actions, even if that PM was from a different party, and was an individual that he might have opposed firmly in the internal political situation in his country.
He says Pakistan must not be punished because his country's former PM visited Russia!!! What kind of freaking defense is this?! What has Pakistan or ex PM done wrong by visiting Russia that it deserved a punishment from US? Is this how foreign minister of a sovereign nation talks?
And yes Bilawal did oppose ex PM Imran Khan's foreign policy while he was opposition leader. He threatened to bolt his historic OIC meeting as well
 
How immature can we get?

I can turn this logic around very simply by stating the fact that IK was in the US and that too in the WH is perhaps indicative of him/his government being a slave. Why did he not stick with Russia and China? Why did he have to go to the US? After all that is the whole gripe here with Bilawal Z. going to the US, right?

Second, grant the fact that he is a 70 year old man vs. comparing to a 33 year old young man. Age brings about experience, however young age and lack of confidence do not betray "slavery" as you are trying to paint here.

I still remember Shah Mehmood Qureshi's major screw-up on CNN when he idiotically presented himself as an anti-semite on a platter to the CNN reporter. So give people some rope. You don't then you and your side won't get much rope either. Petty insults and finger pointing by the other side is what I see ahead for IK and PTI as well given the current state of affairs.

Again... The question is ... What is Bilawal's qualifications for such a position other then his family?

Questioning nepotism is a very 'mature' question.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom