unicorn148
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2009
- Messages
- 595
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
pakisthan is not getting KJ2000 they are getting KJ200 because china dont have platform to support KJ2000
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pakisthan is not getting KJ2000 they are getting KJ200 because china dont have platform to support KJ2000
pakisthan is not getting KJ2000 they are getting KJ200 because china dont have platform to support KJ2000
Why using Y-8 while a better platform available(Y-9)..? I think PAF will go for Y-9. Can anybody confirm about the platform posted above. Is it Y-8 or Y-9?
Why using Y-8 while a better platform available(Y-9)..? I think PAF will go for Y-9. Can anybody confirm about the platform posted above. Is it Y-8 or Y-9?
A proper Y-9 is still in the design or should we say in the prototype manufacture stage. As it is being said to be in the C-130J class, Y-8-600 has much improvement over the earlier versions, but Y-9 will be having different specifications then this variant of Y8-600.
Y8F-600=Y9
Sorry to be asking, but a link to this would be helpful as what i have gone through Chinese defense forums, they say that Y8-600 is different then what Y-9 would be. Plus many articles say the same from Chinese sources and Chinese defence forums.
This is the first time i have heard that Y8-600=Y-9
A proper Y-9 is still in the design or should we say in the prototype manufacture stage. As it is being said to be in the C-130J class, Y-8-600 has much improvement over the earlier versions, but Y-9 will be having different specifications then this variant of Y8-600.
it's a old news,Y-9 is game over now
There have low cost-effective on Y-9,so ....
The delivery date of the first Saab 2000AEW&C was set on Sept-OCT, 09, so why everything wasn't verified to be functional to PAF's satisfaction within that time frame? Why delaying trick on acquiring any teeth that could bite hard like 5-6 yrs span of F-Sola MLU, J-10's order got played unscrupulously whereas the hero that brought fast track 'Nuke state status' got humiliated? Furthermore, sky wasn't even limit of satisfaction but benchmark was definitely needed to be set; especially in a time, when IND and war party were conspiring to unleash any form of storms to disintegrate PAK. But where is the paranoia on PPP/MQM/MILITARY top brass's faces to save PAK?Well...
There is three PAF Saab 2000AEW&C flying around Sweden since a while back and the first one of these is acting as the reference aircraft with installed test equipment.
When everything is verified to be functional to customer satisfaction whatever required adjustments will be applied to the other 2. So even if there is a slight delay the other 2 would be delivered very shortly upon the first one.
The 4th is a bit behind the rest but not by that much.
New Recruit
The delivery date of the first Saab 2000AEW&C was set on Sept-OCT, 09, so why everything wasn't verified to be functional to PAF's satisfaction within that time frame?
A400 also faced delays for many countries, what does that mean?The delivery date of the first Saab 2000AEW&C was set on Sept-OCT, 09, so why everything wasn't verified to be functional to PAF's satisfaction within that time frame? Why delaying trick on acquiring any teeth that could bite hard like 5-6 yrs span of F-Sola MLU, J-10's order got played unscrupulously whereas the hero that brought fast track 'Nuke state status' got humiliated? Furthermore, sky wasn't even limit of satisfaction but benchmark was definitely needed to be set; especially in a time, when IND and war party were conspiring to unleash any form of storms to disintegrate PAK. But where is the paranoia on PPP/MQM/MILITARY top brass's faces to save PAK?