Pakistan will not accept India as UNSC permanent member: Nawaz

[zip]

Whats reason for this kind of appeal to uncle sam by nawaz ?
Domestic consumption or china getting cosier towards India

 

[SrNair]

India is not becoming UNSC permanent member. NS doesn't need to worry about anything.

Nawaz Sharif is the Prime Minister of Pakistan.Not a fanboy like you.
He already passed several comments about our UNSC seat than the power ourage and fuel shortage in his nation.Means he also got reasonable intel about our membership in UNSC .

China got the seat as one of the 4 key allied powers in 1945, when most of the world were still European colonies, India wasn't even formed.

If you're referring to PRC succeeding ROC, PRC was already a full pledge thermo-nuclear power.

You got UNSC seat .Because our former peace deluded PM Nehru agreed for that.They also offered that seat to us .

As per UN charter, a country that doesn't have conflicts with its neighbors is eligible for such a position and India doesn't met the foundation criteria. The oldest issue on the table of UN is unresolved because India didn't accept Kashmir's legitimate right. Even when Kashmir issue is resolved, Indian would have to develop friendly terms before it can be nominated for the position.

UN charter will find its way to garbage when might is right.Absence of India in UNSC will only reduce its leverage in world politics.Pressure would be much after a few years .Because our economy will also get large and so the national power including military.Except US and China others are not above us .
Unlike others we have our independent policy.

How???

We have third largest economy in PPP. We are Nuclear and missile power.

Our potential to grow and strengthen is much more than all 3. All other 3 are past their best.We have yet to achieve our best. Our economy is rising at 7.5% and shall cross 9 to 10 % soon.

Except China.China is still a developing economy.

 

[nair]

What was Obama's reply?

 

[enquencher]

What difference it makes wether pakistan accepts india as a member of security council or not..pakistan has very little relevence in world politics today.

 

[Nexus]

Openly yes but China will definitely veto a resolution calling for India to be part of UNSC. They would probably say they had to veto it as it hampers Pakistan's security.

The US and P5 openly supports the expansion of UNSC but oppose it discretely as it would decrease their veto power (2 vetos would be required to stop a UN resolution).

Also India's military and geo-political strength is nowhere near the top 3 (US, Russia and China).

Yes but indian military can handle other 2 in we have to

Nawaz Ji First You Should Gift Better Railways & Public Transportation to Your CountryMen Then should Demand for UN Permanent Seat

Well, they need power & fuel first.

 

[graphican]

UN charter will find its way to garbage when might is right.

I agree, UN charter will find its way to garbage if India becomes UN permanent member. By allowing India to become Permanent Member, entire legitimacy of UN would go also to garbage. India has no legitimacy in Kashmir either except "might is right" and India without resolving Kashmir issue would have to use its "might" as it doesn't have a right otherwise.

 

[Soulspeek]

Openly yes but China will definitely veto a resolution calling for India to be part of UNSC. They would probably say they had to veto it as it hampers Pakistan's security.

The US and P5 openly supports the expansion of UNSC but oppose it discretely as it would decrease their veto power (2 vetos would be required to stop a UN resolution).

Also India's military and geo-political strength is nowhere near the top 3 (US, Russia and China).

So what? Remember it P5. What about the geopolitical power of remaining two?

India has more geopolitical clout than the remaining two. Plus it is 1/7th of the humanity.

I agree, UN charter will find its way to garbage if India becomes UN permanent member. By allowing India to become Permanent Member, entire legitimacy of UN would go also to garbage. India has no legitimacy in Kashmir either except "might is right" and India without resolving Kashmir issue would have to use its "might" as it doesn't have a right otherwise.

If India cannot be part of UNSC because of Kashmir then what about China-Tibet/Taiwan, Russia-Ukraine???

 

[Nexus]

If India gets a permanent seat then Pakistan must declare war on India and nuke it.

 

[Mr.Nair]

India is the only country more eligible to get UNSC seat than any other country as far almost all factors are considered. Population,Military,UN Peace keeping force,Economy,Nuclear power status,Soft power etc,Period.

 

[Jzaib]

Indian in UNSC is bad news for Pakistan. Nawaz realized it after trying to hard to be friends with india but didn't get any response

 

[SrNair]

I agree, UN charter will find its way to garbage if India becomes UN permanent member. By allowing India to become Permanent Member, entire legitimacy of UN would go also to garbage. India has no legitimacy in Kashmir either except "might is right" and India without resolving Kashmir issue would have to use its "might" as it doesn't have a right otherwise.

Keep dreaming dude.All you can do is whining.We need more national power.But I amsure within 2 decades we wil make the UNSC just a silly organisation without us.
Even Kashmiris dont care about your whining.So you will cry like this forever.We dont care you.

 

[IceCold]

And US president would be
"Hey shut up and listen up" I have called u to tell u that do not oppose any move against India" but! Says Nawaz, no buts you moron, remember who will help u cut a deal once you are thrown out again" "yes sir" phone call ends

 

[Mr.Nair]

I am wondering what's the status of India and Pakistan after 15 years ! In every angle india is growing rapidly.

 

[SrNair]

What was Obama's reply?

Sorry Nawaz we have a lot of business interest in there.

 

[Icewolf]

Even if they do become permanent UNSC member, what's the big deal?

UN is literally powerless.