What's new

Pakistan will not accept hegemony of any country in the region

and for that india would require to take steps, rather than trying to establish relations on terms it has with its smaller neighbours.

well that would need another thread and so should pakistan stop terrorist activities
 
First get your spelling right. it is subtle and not sabtle. You had not added an iota of value to this thread but for kan tutu.
If the only way of proving we are not a pawn is by making US an enemy then you disgrace a bird brain.

luckily you didnt ask to change the spelling of subtleness as well :cheers:

Kan Tuta it self has a history that summed the whole thread. give a thought about it. you will learn something....
 
well that would need another thread and so should pakistan stop terrorist activities

if that can be proved that PAKISTAN is involved in Terrorist activities... apart from IO Kashmir which is a disputed territory.
 
if that can be proved that PAKISTAN is involved in Terrorist activities... apart from IO Kashmir which is a disputed territory.

And why is indulging in terrorist activities in a disputed area ok ??.. Will it ok for India to do so in PO Kashmir??
 
luckily you didnt ask to change the spelling of subtleness as well :cheers:

Kan Tuta it self has a history that summed the whole thread. give a thought about it. you will learn something....

Wrong choice for a question. The question is have you learnt anything? Refer to Post #39
 
In a clear rebuff to US secretary of state Hillary Clinton's stand that India should take a lead in Asia, Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has said that Pakistan does not want a "chaudhry" in the region.
Thats funny because then what is China's role ?
 
And why is indulging in terrorist activities in a disputed area ok ??.. Will it ok for India to do so in PO Kashmir??

thats no way terrorism activity, thats the moral and diplomatic support of Kashmiri freedom struggle.... that we shall never abandon until they get freedom from Indian occupation, its our legal right...
on the other hand your own army says zero infiltration... so you cannot blame state or non state actors involved.

you are involved in terrorism is pakistan through Afghan proxy, and India has been involved in terrorism against Pakistan then East Pakistan... what about that then ???
 
if india has both political & economical clout,then it will definitely become so called "chaudhry" in the region irrespective of pak PM wish..
 
Wrong choice for a question. The question is have you learnt anything? Refer to Post #39

it has been answered quite a few times, the cooperation is something else, being kan tuta is something else... learn something !!
 
thats no way terrorism activity, thats the moral and diplomatic support of Kashmiri freedom struggle.... that we shall never abandon until they get freedom from Indian occupation, its our legal right...
on the other hand your own army says zero infiltration... so you cannot blame state or non state actors involved.

you are involved in terrorism is pakistan through Afghan proxy, and India has been involved in terrorism against Pakistan then East Pakistan... what about that then ???

those militants kill innocent Kashmiri Pandits and really? how do we support terrorism in Pakistan through Afghan proxy? and don't tell me some made up media report about finding "Indian made ammunition" at a crime scene etc

East Pakistan was different Mukti Bahini was not a terrorist organization they did not kill innocents or bomb etc they were for fighting for an independent Bangladesh since the Bengalis were treated as 2nd class citizens and they're demands were largely ignored even when a cyclone hit the area west Pakistan still had more money spent on it
 
those militants kill innocent Kashmiri Pandits and really? how do we support terrorism in Pakistan through Afghan proxy? and don't tell me some made up media report about finding "Indian made ammunition" at a crime scene etc

East Pakistan was different Mukti Bahini was not a terrorist organization they did not kill innocents or bomb etc they were for fighting for an independent Bangladesh since the Bengalis were treated as 2nd class citizens and they're demands were largely ignored even when a cyclone hit the area west Pakistan still had more money spent on it

yeah it was different because it suits your kan tuta pan ? what a douche bag !!
 
thats no way terrorism activity, thats the moral and diplomatic support of Kashmiri freedom struggle.... that we shall never abandon until they get freedom from Indian occupation, its our legal right...
on the other hand your own army says zero infiltration... so you cannot blame state or non state actors involved.

you are involved in terrorism is pakistan through Afghan proxy, and India has been involved in terrorism against Pakistan then East Pakistan... what about that then ???

Mate, I asked this because you said that Pakistan indulges in Terrorism in IO Kashmir...

if that can be proved that PAKISTAN is involved in Terrorist activities... apart from IO Kashmir which is a disputed territory.
 
thats no way terrorism activity, thats the moral and diplomatic support of Kashmiri freedom struggle.... that we shall never abandon until they get freedom from Indian occupation, its our legal right...

Its your legal right?? lol.can you explain how??
by this logic would you think it is our(india's) legal right to support terrorist activities in your side of kashmir.
 
it has been answered quite a few times, the cooperation is something else, being kan tuta is something else... learn something !!

The US considers India as a "strategic ally" while Pakistan is treated as a "hired gun", cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan has said

Should I say who is who now. Instead of teaching and preaching, introspect.
 
Back
Top Bottom