What's new

Pakistan Urges US to Refrain From Attacking Iran

Pakistan should stop pretending to be master of Muslim world.this is not our conflict.let them fight.

Unfortunately we have an abundance of cuckolds in pakistan who care about every sh1thole country around them for various reasons and doctrines. The only country that doesn't matter to them is pakistan itself.
 
Last edited:
.
top-ten-differences-between-the-750x422.jpg

Top Ten differences between the Iraq War and Trump’s Proposed Iran War
JUAN COLE05/15/2019

Tweet
Share
Reddit
Email
1. Iraq is 168,754 mi² and Iran is 636,400 mi²; that is, Iran is geographically 3.77 times bigger than Iraq, almost 4 times as big.

Iran_ethnoreligious_distribution_2004-750x742.jpg


2. Iraq’s population when invaded was 26 million. Iran’s population today is 81 million.

3. General Eric Shinseki testified before Congress prior to Bush’s invasion that based on the US military’s experience in the Balkans, 800,000 troops would be needed to provide security to Iraq. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld insisted on 100,000 troops, wrongly believing he could pull them out in 6 months. Bush’s viceroy in Iraq, Paul Bremer, later admitted that “we never had enough troops” in Iraq.

4. Since Iran is 3 times as populous as Iraq, by Shinseki’s correct calculation, the US would need 2.4 million troops to occupy Iran.

5. The US total military personnel count is about 2,141,900, of whom 1, 281,900 are active duty and the rest reservists.

6. Iraq’s army was a conventional military force with four powerful tank divisions, which the US Air Force turned to black carbon dust. The US only ran into trouble when Iraqis opposed to the invasion turned to guerrilla tactics, which the US never was able to deal with effectively.

7. Iran can already mobilize at least 1.5 million paramilitary “Basij” forces for guerrilla warfare. This is in addition to over 500,000 active duty military personnel.

8. Iraq was largely ruled by a small Sunni minority of perhaps 17% of the population. Iran is ruled by the Shiite majority that makes up 90% of the population. That Iraq had a minority government allowed the Bush administration to make friends in the majority Shiite community by putting them in power. This step alienated and angered the Sunnis, but they were a minority and so could not do much about it. In Iran, the Shiite majority would mount a massive struggle against the US invaders.

9. Bush found international allies for his war on Iraq, including Britain and Spain. No one in Western Europe would join Trump in a war with Iran, making the US isolated and causing it to look like a unilateralist bully.

10. Whereas Iraq’s allies– Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia in particular– had been mauled by Saddam and so did not strongly oppose Bush’s invasion, Shiite Iraqis, many Syrians, the Hazaras of Afghanistan, and the some 40 million Shiites of Pakistan would support Iran.



Bonus video:

PBS Newshour: “U.S.-Iran tensions continue to rise after apparent attacks, military deployments”


https://www.juancole.com/2019/05/differences-between-proposed.html
 
.
My friend I am not thinking wishfully but telling you reality Iran US war will result in Taliban getting back kabul. Why would Iran take war south instead of north? Give me one good reason for Iran not supporting Taliban?
Taliban will never get to Kabul with force for as long as American troops are stationed there. Mark my words. Taliban is negotiating a political endgame with US for this very reason alone and they have assured US of not supporting foreign elements in exchange for American withdrawal which will happen after the deal.
 
.
No, you are being a juvenile in your view of things. Should US strike at Iran in force and bring about collapse of its regime, how would Iranian leftovers in the position to help Taliban in Afghanistan? Rather Taliban will be under intense pressure to negotiate an endgame with US.

US is weak in Afghanistan because it does not have direct access to its lands from any angle. By setting fire to Iran, US will have proper access to Afghanistan.

If these are your views you know nothing about war structure of Iran and US war doctorin. Iran works on IRGC war structure. Where as US works on business base foreign policy war structure. Iranian structure is best to defend it's country with IRGC as core body. Where as us foreign policy war based structure uses air Force as tool with navy as logistical support. In the end USAF and IRGC will deal each other least damage and Iran will play Kabul game.
 
.
If these are your views you know nothing about war structure of Iran and US war doctorin. Iran works on IRGC war structure. Where as US works on business base foreign policy war structure. Iranian structure is best to defend it's country with IRGC as core body. Where as us foreign policy war based structure uses air Force as tool with navy as logistical support. In the end USAF and IRGC will deal each other least damage and Iran will play Kabul game.
Just like your IMF predictions came true - wishful thinking on your part. There is much beneath the waves you are overlooking because you are utterly sold to Iran and Taliban being infallible allies - you 'are' naive, my friend.

Taliban are only strong in Afghanistan; they cannot challenge US and nor have any interest in challenging US in foreign lands. Taliban's fight is for its very survival and legitimacy in Afghanistan, nothing more.
 
Last edited:
. .
Just like your IMF predictions came true - wishful thinking on your part. There is much beneath the waves you are overlooking because you are utterly sold to Iran and Taliban being infallible allies - you 'are' naive, my friend.

Lol
If I speak the truth I am sold?
My IMF prediction came true Pakistan spent a whole fiscal year without IMF loan and still the IMF money has not yet arrived into Pakistan. In the same way USA will fail in Iran war because Afghanistan is not in control of USA. Why did USA came into Afghanistan in the first place? Do you remember? To fight terrorism and now you are saying there will be deal with Taliban so what happened to word terrorist?
 
.
@xyxmt @LeGenD
You are both right. But what @xyxmt is saying is not wrong. India might definitely covertly try to take over Iran's Sistan and Baluchistan Provence during the chaos or after Iran is destroyed to create a Baloch state with an army to forever threaten Pakistan, Similar to what US did in northern Syria with Kurds to threaten Turkey.
 
. . .
Business: sell weapons to middle East
Base: keep military bases in foreign countries
Foreign policy: contain countries with sanctions.

All in the pursuit of national interests, just like any other country. There is nothing special about that at all.
 
.
The way I see it. Iran bahana, Pakistan nishana.

They yanks in afghni land planned to target Pakistan and unfortunately it didn't go as plan because the talib put an end to those plans!

However I see this as another attempt to destabilise the region which WILL affect Pakistan.
 
.
Good, though i hate Mullah regime, but what comes after Mullahs would be worst. Pakistan should be more vocal in opposing any war. Why its only on sputnik tabloid instead of Al Jazeera, BBC, CNN like reputed propaganda agencies.

BBC is in full propaganda mode. I just watch the UK channel, they are portraying US acting against ‘Iranian threats’ without any evidence whatsoever.

I do feel sorry for Iran - one year ago they were peacefully implementing the nuclear deal. Israel ripped up the deal through puppet Trump - now they portray Iran as ‘aggressor’. This is how easy it is for Western media to change narrative.
 
.
The way I see it. Iran bahana, Pakistan nishana.

They yanks in afghni land was to target Pakistan and unfortunately it didn't go as plan because the talib put an end to those plans!

However I see this as another attempt to destabilise the region which WILL affect Pakistan.

It looks like in your world pakistan is the center of universe. Everything happening in this universe has a pakistani connection. :laughcry:
 
.
All in the pursuit of national interests, just like any other country. There is nothing special about that at all.
Sorry not like any other country but something USA learned from Nazi. No country kills other for interests. Only phycopaths do that.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom