What's new

Pakistan under renewed pressure for nuke freeze

Ghareeb_Da_Baal

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
6,654
Reaction score
4
Country
Argentina
Location
Argentina
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is under immense pressure from powerful countries led by the US to freeze its nuclear programme by agreeing to a controversial treaty that bans production of fissile materials to make atomic bomb.
Western powers, which are pushing for a deal on the Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT), have threatened to take Pakistan’s case to the UN Security Council if it did not sign the longstanding agreement, disclosed a senior official of the country’s nuclear establishment.
“You can’t even imagine what kind of pressures is being exerted on Pakistan,” said the official, who is associated with the Strategic Plans Division (SPD). Headed by Gen Khalid Kidwai, the SPD controls the country’s nuclear arsenal.
In a rare background conversation, the SPD official told The Express Tribune that Western powers particularly the US have been using ‘coercive measures’ for the last several months against Pakistan.
“They have threatened to take our case to the UNSC … they are even threatening us with isolation,” he added.
However, the country’s political and military leadership have so far resisted the pressure as they believe bowing to such demands will seriously undermine the country’s national security, said a top foreign office official. “It’s a Pakistan-specific treaty,” the official added. “The FMCT will not harm big powers because they have surplus nuclear fuel,” he said.
He said Pakistan will have to open its nuclear facilities to international inspections if it signs the FMCT. “This is certainly unacceptable,” he maintained.
The idea of placing a ban on the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons has been discussed for a long time, and the talks broke down in 1995. Since then, there has been very little formal progress.
However, US President Barack Obama is trying to revive the process. At the nuclear summit held in January this year in Washington, President Obama expressed disappointment over Pakistan’s refusal to sign the FMCT. Islamabad has been accused of being a major roadblock in the way of finalising an accord on FMCT, which envisages a ban on the production of highly enriched uranium and plutonium.
One of the key objectives of the FMCT is to prevent terrorists from getting their hands on the fissile material. Western countries fear Pakistan is the most likely country, where this could happen. “This is ridiculous,” said another official.
Pakistan believes FMCT must include existing stocks otherwise the imbalance of power in the world will simply be further enhanced. Its reluctance to sign the treaty is also attributed to the discriminatory policies of the West on civilian nuclear cooperation.
“Some states have been denied the right to peaceful nuclear cooperation while others are supported in promoting unsafe nuclear programmes,” asserted the official in a clear reference to Indo-US nuclear deal.
“With its current form and conditions, Pakistan will never sign the FMCT,” remarked Foreign Office Spokesman Abdul Basit.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 13th, 2010.
 
Simple solution negotiate with Zardari.
 
hahhahahahahaahhahahahaha :cough::cough:

KAFIRS on unity

pakistan should say, first freeze india's and freeze yours then we will happily do that, after we reach an equal status, or other wise, keep leaving in delusion, if obama and bush can neglect pakistan and arm india, then pressure has no real meaning, pakistanis have to say to them, if u put pressure on us, all of your soldiers are gonna die in hell in afghanistan
 
The same pressure should be on India, double standards anyone? Plus if Zardari has been defending our secrets and standing up for our rights in this case, then I will back him up if he doesn't sell out. This is one way Zaradari can gain support.

How about you freeze your nuclear activities Obama... don't be a hypocrite.
 
Last edited:
It is not in Pakistan's interest to even review the FCMT, since western countries have stock piled warhead in the thousands. Israel and India continue to build their arsenal, but the main goal of the western countries is to damage Pakistan's defences. This treaty is a total no no for Pakistan.
 
So what if they take our case to the security council? sanction us....fine go a head.....sanctions did not stop us from building the bomb nor did it stop us from detonating it. So what makes them think it will stop us now and specially when there is so much imbalance thanks to the controversial Indo US nuclear deal.
US at this stage cant really afford to alienate Pakistan, i think we need to make them realize this reality through back door.
 
The same pressure should be on India, double standards anyone? Plus if Zardari has been defending our secrets and standing up for our rights in this case, then I will back him up if he doesn't sell out. This is one way Zaradari can gain support.

How about you freeze your nuclear activities Obama... don't be a hypocrite.

Are you really brazillian ? just asking
 
Pakistan has no incentive for signing the treaty. Nothing to gain.

Infact with nukes forming one pillar of national security in Pakistan, signing this treaty will infact be a net loss for Pakistan.

As far as living under sanctions is concerned, its going to be very difficult. This isnt the 1990s when all was pretty much at peace in pakistan. The economy is currently in a fragile state and TTP are creating a ruckus all over the country. Sanctions at this time would really cripple several of the state institutions.

I also believe that these sanctions will most probably not be enacted. Firstly US still depends on Pakistan to support its forces in Afganistan. IF ,and its a big if, US comes up with another better route, sanctions might become a reality but not before that. or once US completely leaves Afganistan.
Also China will probably support pakistan on this and veto any move.
 
Pakistan has no incentive for signing the treaty. Nothing to gain.

Infact with nukes forming one pillar of national security in Pakistan, signing this treaty will infact be a net loss for Pakistan.

As far as living under sanctions is concerned, its going to be very difficult. This isnt the 1990s when all was pretty much at peace in pakistan. The economy is currently in a fragile state and TTP are creating a ruckus all over the country. Sanctions at this time would really cripple several of the state institutions.

I also believe that these sanctions will most probably not be enacted. Firstly US still depends on Pakistan to support its forces in Afganistan. IF ,and its a big if, US comes up with another better route, sanctions might become a reality but not before that. or once US completely leaves Afganistan.
Also China will probably support pakistan on this and veto any move.

Not just the US, every NATO country relies on Pakistan for logistical support. If the whites have nukes and the yellow skin have nukes then the brown ones should have the same right to have them.
 
Nothing new, PAK is under pressure from the day it carried out its own nuclear explosions :)
 
US and every other western country should understand that if uptil now Pakistan's nuclear missiles are safe from the terrorists, it is because the world is unaware of their location.

Secondly Dr. A.Q Khan (nuclear scientist), confirmed that the nuclear missiles are not in one piece and challenged that even if I keep all the pieces in front of Oxford University graduates in nuclear sciences; they cannot assemble it.
 
If this report is true than it does not mean to force Pakistan to sign FMCT but to bully Pakistan for some other purposes. Isolation and UNSC action have not stoped Pakistan before nor it will in future.
 
Currently we have enough nukes for our requirement as a deterrent. A freeze for a limited time frame (10 or 15 years) may be suggested in return for incentives such as nuclear technology and cooperation as offered to India a few years ago, along with other incentives. “With its current form and conditions, Pakistan will never sign the FMCT,” a FO spokesman has said, well maybe we can suggest alternatives that will make the treaty work for us?

But, if we may consider other view, like: compromise on nuclear program will result into ultimate fall of the state as it will open the doors to the IAEA and the whole program will finally be shut down.:angry:

Well, there is a lot more to discuss on this issue but the core attention and priority must be given to the sovereignty of the beloved country. Our nasty leadership is the most inferior leadership of the world’s history and if some one is expecting something good from them is not more than building castles in the air. Before we all fall over ourselves screeching and wailing and gnashing our teeth, maybe we should think about the possibilities, this is where our diplomats can show their worth.:azn:
 
Simple solution negotiate with Zardari.

Zardari ki khuuuuuuuuul jaye agar us ne sign kia. He is not the owner of country's strategic asserts! The 10% better save his @$$ and negotiate a flat in America or England as his ****** days are counted.
 
^^^ I agree
This sun of b**ch is not in control of Nuks and any other national assets.
 
Back
Top Bottom