GriffinsRule
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 3,394
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Like the Indian flat bed that carried Tejas at one point?You're slacking on the aircraft carrier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like the Indian flat bed that carried Tejas at one point?You're slacking on the aircraft carrier.
I think you are conflating Albatross and Albatross NG. Albatross is a legacy system based around Aspide 2000 (this is essentially the Sea/ship mounted version of SPADA 2000). The Albatross NG is based on CAMM-ER and is VLS based. I dont think it comes in box launcher form. That said, there is definitely room for an 8 cell VLS for something like MILDAS or a 12 cell GWS.35 where the current FM-90 sits. Some of the cell may need to protude up, but it is doable.
This i agree with. I would think the logical, low cost upgrade is with FL-3000N (HHQ-10), BUT, if they really wanted to get the most out of F-22P, they would go with the VLS. Even if this upgrade (new radars, VLS/Albatross NG, and a new CMS, like the Genesis upgrade for the G-class frigates) costs. $150M per ship, it is still half the cost of a new similarly equipped frigate. Also the interview specifically mentioned Albatross for F-22P.For F-22Ps, I always thought PN may replace the FM-90 with 15 or 24 cell HHQ10 point defense. (Just like what PLAN did). If not that then the other option could be Albatross based external launcher as shown in the below
Remember this?So...are we guessing that the P-282 is a locally-built variant of the CM-400AKG or SY-400?
There you go...
@Bilal Khan (Quwa) @kursed @Akh1112
View attachment 791840Pakistan receives new Chinese-made frigate. How will it fare against India’s Navy?
Named Tughril, the frigate and its sister ships are the most powerful surface vessels planned under Pakistan’s naval modernization program, meant to redress a conventional imbalance with India.www.defensenews.com
I should've bet money or something lol.
Actually, the PN Chief confirmed that the Tughril-class FFG is armed with the CM-302.Remember this?
New Recruit
Doesn't PN operate (or have been rumored too) CM-401?So...are we guessing that the P-282 is a locally-built variant of the CM-400AKG or SY-400?
Well you just said what I was gonna sayRemember this?
HD-1A/C is quiet short legged for a proper SSCM , however it may be good enough for a corvette,It's starting to seem that "P-282" may refer to an SSCM, like a locally-built CM-302 or HD-1A.
According to SIPRI's trade register, we bought 30 CM-401 in 2021. I know it isn't always accurate, but still interesting.Doesn't PN operate (or have been rumored too) CM-401?
So...are we guessing that the P-282 is a locally-built variant of the CM-400AKG or SY-400?
If according to the turkish article, PN Milgem are getting a 6 Cell layout of P282 than OPV 2600 will likely also be fitted with the same 6 Cell P282 layout as shown here.Remember this?
CM400AKG for JEFsAccording to SIPRI's trade register, we bought 30 CM-401 in 2021. I know it isn't always accurate, but still interesting.
For now, it seems the exact weapon configuration for PN's latest and upcoming vessels will remain a mystery (probably for the better).
One reason why I suspect the HD-1C could be on the cards (despite the CM-302 purchase) is that the Jinnah-class frigate has a 2x4 configuration (at least on the brochures), and it too is called "P-282."Doesn't PN operate (or have been rumored too) CM-401?
Well you just said what I was gonna say
HD-1A/C is quiet short legged for a proper SSCM , however it may be good enough for a corvette,
IMHO they should go for something like the full fat HD-1 instead. It seems like a better choice than cm302 even.
View attachment 920208