What's new

Pakistan to grant consular access to Indian spy Kulbhushan on Friday: FO

WHat I want is irrelevant but what India wanted , it got and what Pakistan never wanted is now being forced to do it :) ,,yes you can keep him in jail while we plan our next move !! India has our hero's back !

So Indians consider terrorists their heroes. I see...You might want to jot down the name/contact info of the counselor for Jadhav.
 
.
:lol:

Hallucinating Hindus are one thing, their disease has infected a lot of Sikhs as well it seems!
 
.
:lol:

Hallucinating Hindus are one thing, their disease has infected a lot of Sikhs as well it seems!

Must be an airborne parasite in their poop and by pooping in the street they infect others. That's my theory anyway.
 
.
Must be an airborne parasite in their poop and by pooping in the street they infect others. That's my theory anyway.

It makes the hosts compulsive liars devoid of any logic and rationality!

Jatt Sikh talking out of his arse - that's how bad it is!
 
.
So Indians consider terrorists their heroes. I see...You might want to jot down the name/contact info of the counselor for Jadhav.

Any Indian who suffers unfair attrocities by false framing by Pakistan is our hero !

:lol:

Hallucinating Hindus are one thing, their disease has infected a lot of Sikhs as well it seems!

I understand why you make a Hindu your hero when he reaches major rank..beacuse as much as you want, you cant get religion out of your head.. that's where we are proudly different... we fight for nation first !
 
.
Any Indian who suffers unfair attrocities by false framing by Pakistan is our hero !

Unfair attrocities for crimes that he confessed to and were backed by the judgment of an international body of justice? So what is fair Modi's word?
 
. .

Instead of hoping to satisfy me, that shouldn't be the concern for you instead try to be satisfied and read between the lines. India succeed to win only one point of providing consular access to KJ and the rest is all rejected/denied. The rest are Pakistan objections on the various points and prayers of India. You can read couple of paragraphs in isolated manners to understand a Judgment & legal language as such. There is lot of difference between arguments or pleading of the case as compare to Judgment of the Court. Your arguments or written statement may contain thousands of points to discuss but there is a Judgment that clears everything.

Ok I won't go into all other request as you say since its futile on this forum. Let's talk on the point that you agree since it will be easy for both of us... You said no consular access when we requested so why giving access now? It's clear that India basically snatched the access from you through ICJ inspite you not allowing.

We denied India plainly despite of Indian isolation of Pakistan but then India ran to ICJ so Pakistan honours the Judgment. India can explain it the way like snatch or forced or by hook & crook for the national grace but that is not the case in rest of the world.
 
.
Instead of hoping to satisfy me, that shouldn't be the concern for you instead try to be satisfied and read between the lines. India succeed to win only one point of providing consular access to KJ and the rest is all rejected/denied. The rest are Pakistan objections on the various points and prayers of India. You can read couple of paragraphs in isolated manners to understand a Judgment & legal language as such. There is lot of difference between arguments or pleading of the case as compare to Judgment of the Court. Your arguments or written statement may contain thousands of points to discuss but there is a Judgment that clears everything.



We denied India plainly despite of Indian isolation of Pakistan but then India ran to ICJ so Pakistan honours the Judgment. India can explain it the way like snatch or forced or by hook & crook for the national grace but that is not the case in rest of the world.

You have the full judgement. Can you point out where any point of Pakistan was accepted. Where any judge other than the Pakistani judge agreed with Pakistan's view.

When I asked you if you were satisfied I meant satisfied with the links provided and not with the judgement. That was since you did not like just the press release. I cannot imagine why you would think that the ICJ would give a press release that differed substantially from the judgement
 
.
after the meeting we will see who cries.
only Pakiatan!! supa powa india never cries and if you dont free our monkey we will send abhinondone to free him!!

fk you Pakistan fk you!! our vedic tech makes us invincible!!

yabbbaaa dabbba doool!!!
 
.
You have the full judgement. Can you point out where any point of Pakistan was accepted. Where any judge other than the Pakistani judge agreed with Pakistan's view.

When I asked you if you were satisfied I meant satisfied with the links provided and not with the judgement. That was since you did not like just the press release. I cannot imagine why you would think that the ICJ would give a press release that differed substantially from the judgement

Rejection of Indian prayer is an acceptance of Pakistan's points which were raised during rebuttal. Simple.

This is not about my like or dislike but the facts therein. Go through ICJ verdict based thread about Kalbhushan J and the matter was discussed in detail with all the Indian prayers and I am no mode to repeat all that again here. The consular access point is where 15 to 1 votes were given in favour of India and there Pakistan Adhoc Judge Tasudaq Jilani put a dissenting note clearly stating that Geneva does not provide such rights to the spy. Only point of consular access was accepted by the Court. If you know details or read over the India prayers, you will know how many Indian points are rejected.
 
.
Lol no... let me tell you what was the plan.. the plan was to execute him by sentencing through your military laws... and guess what ?? your military court even sentenced him to death... and then IT WAS INDIA who dragged the case so far.. you were so convinced (or were trying to, to your public and the world) that he is a terrorist so he will get no conslkar access...and actually you are right. If he is a terrorist he does not get a consular access but he is getting it. Also let me educate you how it works in diplomacy.. if you tried to keep the case alive in diplomacy circle, you will need to have a purpose, if the purpose is to keep him alive while India claims him to be innocent then world will never accept him as terrorist without a trial...also let me tell you what blunder you made diplomatically... YOU WENT TO THE COURT.. thats what India wanted, to drag you to ICJ.. that's where you made the diplomatic mistake..so dont tell me you wanted to keep this alive at 'Diplomatic Circle'..lol. Now you may continue your poetry !

:blah::blah::blah::blah::blah:
 
. . . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom