What's new

Pakistan to fish in troubled water, if China launches offensive: IAF

Why do we need to fight each other in the first place?

China still needs at least 10-20 more years, to compete our current phase of economic expansion.

We are the ones gaining the most from the current global status quo, we are adding more than a trillion to our GDP every single year. We're not the ones who need to rock the boat.
 
Why do we need to fight each other in the first place?

China still needs at least 10-20 more years, to compete our current phase of economic expansion.

We are the ones gaining the most from the current global status quo, we are adding more than a trillion to our GDP every single year. We're not the ones who need to rock the boat.
HOPE FOR THE BEST BUT PREPARE FOR THE WORST

And more than 3 wars had already been pressed on India by both Pak and China. Thats reason enough to prepare !!!
( we already have talked about 62 , China and Indian policy but War wasn't solution even back then. Proper talks would have solved many problems but Still war happened )
 
IAF beating its chest for more money for arms. India doesn't face a threat from Pakistan and China, unless it invades Pakistan or China.

History shows the opposite, therefor it's logical to at least try to be prepared, although everybody knows that a 2 front war can't be won without external help. But yes, it's just a PR move by IAF to get the needed fighters.

Why do we need to fight each other in the first place?

China still needs at least 10-20 more years, to compete our current phase of economic expansion.

We are the ones gaining the most from the current global status quo, we are adding more than a trillion to our GDP every single year. We're not the ones who need to rock the boat.

True, that's why offensive actions against borderlines of neighbors doesn't actually help. But exactly these actions create tensions and increases military growth, be it at the Indo-Chinese borders, or the South Chinese Sea. It would be much better for everybody, if China use the weakness of the US and the west, in favour to gain trust of it's Asian neighbors.
 
Last edited:
It's a concern and of course a threat perception - but mainly it is a pre warning to sort out procurement issues.
 
Keep reminding these damn politicians until they their backsides in gear and put pen to paper on deals. The sad thing is India has the fcking cash! $150BN modernisation budget for the IAF alone by 2022 but how much of this will go unspent if the current kind of paralysis continues?
 
lol.....
I have never seen a person celebrating its own country defeat ........In 65, 48, and 99....
and abt 2008.....world declared Pakistan as a epi center of world terrorism.......and here we find one celebrating that.....:rofl::rofl:

You have to know that till this year, they are holding on that Top Rank and Award for 7 continuous year. Hell thats a achievement. Have you ever seen India hold on to the top rank for long? Hell even in Cricket , NO :(
Hail Pakistan :) :pakistan::pakistan:
 
a few things according to indians, that if removed there will be no pakistan..
if we remove Jinah from pakistan , there will be no pakistan
if we remove religion from pakistan , there will be no pakistan
if we remove nuclear weapons from pakistan , there will be no pakistan
if we remove army from pakistan , there will be no pakistan
in the near future ..
if we remove Anything from pakistan , there will be no pakistan...:lol:..
o man stop it..

Nukes, army, religion are not what defines a State. The State as it is to be, gets defined by its founder and the person behind it. The thought of Pakistan as an entity was achieved by Jinnah. His name unites Pakistanis. They fight over what that vision was, but, they all agree the visionary was Jinnah. You remove Jinnah, there is no vision. The reason for the strife is inability of the State to put forward with a clear cut directive what its vision is.

Now, the above is a simple observation.
 
Sorry to say but India is behaving like a child who wants to play with Older boys..
 
Nukes, army, religion are not what defines a State. The State as it is to be, gets defined by its founder and the person behind it. The thought of Pakistan as an entity was achieved by Jinnah. His name unites Pakistanis. They fight over what that vision was, but, they all agree the visionary was Jinnah. You remove Jinnah, there is no vision. The reason for the strife is inability of the State to put forward with a clear cut directive what its vision is.

Now, the above is a simple observation.
"Jinah" is a name of extreme respect and inspiration in pakistan but unfortunately it is not the one which unites pakistan, otherwise we would not have any ethenicity at all....and yes you are right that Jinah was a visionary.
 
Back
Top Bottom