What's new

Pakistan Tipped Off US On OBL

I strongly believe that infact it was the pakistani elite troops who killed OBL:agree:.

ISI got the number,and pak troops finished him.The body and credit was given to USA later on:agree:
 
.
I already wrote about this on the "OBL Raid Q&A" thread.
Yes, we did provide the info about the "Kuwaitis" however, they were small time Jihadis and were kept under watch but never did we expect that they would be hosting Osama, it was the Americans that found that out.
 
.
To make the US version of story look more real.......which infact is not true cuz both were working together in this buisiness and their business together was to fool the world .....:smokin:
OR how about this - there's no freakin way in hell that Osama could've lived that long in PAK without the knowledge of ISI/military in this matter ! PAK isn't the size of Russia nor does it have a population that exceeds a billion so its practically impossible for such a large group(Osama's family & close aides) of people to evade not only the home country's intelligence operatives but also CIA & possibly NATO allies searching for him secretly inside PAK unless someone from ISI/military was helpin them constantly !
 
.
OR how about this - there's no freakin way in hell that Osama could've lived that long in PAK without the knowledge of ISI/military in this matter ! PAK isn't the size of Russia nor does it have a population that exceeds a billion so its practically impossible for such a large group(Osama's family & close aides) of people to evade not only the home country's intelligence operatives but also CIA & possibly NATO allies searching for him secretly inside PAK unless someone from ISI/military was helpin them constantly !


So you mean to imply that 11 people aided by local hosts (not in the ISI), cannot hide without being detected?
Ok then, leaving OBL out, that still leaves us with over 300 most wanted terrorists scattered over the world, the ISI can't possibly be facilitating each and every one of them, so why not look them out and earn billions in bounty, sound like a plan?
 
.
1. Some Pakistanis say OBL wasn't there in Pakistan. (Conspiracy theorists)
2. Some Pakistanis say OBL was dead a long back. (again, conspiracy theorists. )
3. Some Pakistanis say we did not hide OBL. (LOL)
4. Some Pakistanis say he was there in Pakistan but we didn't know it. (Then why don't you kiss goodbye to your ISI which is not competent enough to find out the biggest terrorist living near the military academy?)
5. Some Pakistanis say OBL was there in Pakistan and we knew it. (Why are you saying it after 1 year? Why angry on USA's unilateral strike? Why don't you leave that doctor alone?)

what the hell is going on?
 
.
1. Some Pakistanis say OBL wasn't there in Pakistan. (Conspiracy theorists)
2. Some Pakistanis say OBL was dead a long back. (again, conspiracy theorists. )
3. Some Pakistanis say we did not hide OBL. (LOL)
4. Some Pakistanis say he was there in Pakistan but we didn't know it. (Then why don't you kiss goodbye to your ISI which is not competent enough to find out the biggest terrorist living near the military academy?)
5. Some Pakistanis say OBL was there in Pakistan and we knew it. (Why are you saying it after 1 year? Why angry on USA's unilateral strike? Why don't you leave that doctor alone?)

what the hell is going on?

Exact my words? Anyone care to clarify?
 
.
3. Some Pakistanis say we did not hide OBL. (LOL)

We didn't, if you believe otherwise then quote your source.

4. Some Pakistanis say he was there in Pakistan but we didn't know it. (Then why don't you kiss goodbye to your ISI which is not competent enough to find out the biggest terrorist living near the military academy?)

Are the houses near Military Academies made without walls that finding him there would be any easier, the an lived in a windowless room for 5 years with the only communication with the outside world being a personal courier, how do you track such a man? I don't know if R&AW uses psychics because they are the only ones who could have known.

5. Some Pakistanis say OBL was there in Pakistan and we knew it. (Why are you saying it after 1 year? Why angry on USA's unilateral strike? Why don't you leave that doctor alone?)

Funny how conspiracy theories are only those that negate your PoV, because this would otherwise also be called a conspiracy theory.
 
.
So you mean to imply that 11 people aided by local hosts (not in the ISI), cannot hide without being detected?
Ok then, leaving OBL out, that still leaves us with over 300 most wanted terrorists scattered over the world, the ISI can't possibly be facilitating each and every one of them, so why not look them out and earn billions in bounty, sound like a plan?
Yes considering that so many high level AQ & Taliban commanders were flushed out for the US its improbable that Osama could've survived without any local help whatsoever ! Even in the best case scenario what ISI might've done is turn a blind eye towards him & let him roam in the country freely(as some reports suggest) at the same time tipping him off(possibly) when the US got too close to him.

The second part is pretty obvious - the ISI doesn't have control over radical elements outside of PAK but since 2001 most of those high profile arrests were made in PAK that signifies two things,
Firstly PAK is at the epicenter of terrorism as it stands now, that isn't entirely PAK's fault cause the @F-P@K(WTH is this word censored ?) border is pretty porous & its easy for militants to go back & forth from either side.
Secondly the extremist elements in PAK are now realigning themselves with a common cause of fighting against the US & its allies. While many of them have their vested interests in Afghanistan or Kashmir they've gone beyond the level of sophistication & cooperation that we see with lesser groups around the world.

What this means for PAK is that as long as they are perceived as aiding the US in this supposed WoT some of those influential militia won't hesitate to turn against the ISI/army though the more interesting thing would be to watch out as & if the NATO combat forces leave Afghanistan after 2014 i.e. whether the army allows the porous border as an escape route for terrorists or strike those in PAK who'll eventually turn against them when they've got enough power to do so !
 
.
Some more details about US-Pak intelligence cooperation on AQ and the hunt for OBL (prior to 2011) as well as some more details a bout the 'raw data' that Pakistan provided the US, without which the US would not have been able to locate OBL.

The intelligence cooperation between the US and Pakistan in tracking OBL debunks the US argument that they could not trust Pakistan with the intelligence, and even Bruce Reidel is unable to offer any logical or factual justification, in light of the cooperation provided by Pakistan revealed in this article, for the US decision to back-stab Pakistan and not share intelligence with her on the location of OBL, that could not have been obtained without Pakistani cooperation in the first place.

Pakistan reveals efforts to hunt down Osama bin Laden

One year since embarrassment of Bin Laden's Abbottabad death, Pakistan is moving itself closer to centre of events

Jon Boone and Jason Burke
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 29 April 2012 14.49 EDT

For almost a year, Pakistan's security establishment has been in a state of deep fury and embarrassment over the killing of Osama bin Laden. But its annoyance, US diplomats note, has not been directed at how the world's most wanted man could have lived inside the country for so long, but rather at how a US team could have got in and out of its territory undetected.

So far, there have been no arrests of sympathisers who might have helped Bin Laden move around Pakistan undetected before settling in the town of Abbottabad. Authorities appear more concerned with investigating what they see as a gross violation of sovereignty that badly damaged the prestige and reputation of the powerful Pakistani military.

The only known arrest has been of Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani doctor who worked in Abbottabad as part of the CIA effort to try to pinpoint the al-Qaida chief. A Pakistani commission investigating Bin Laden's death recommended Afridi be charged with "conspiracy against the state of Pakistan and high treason".

But amid efforts on both sides to improve the terrible state of US-Pakistani relations, bitter recriminations are starting to give way to a modest effort by Pakistan's intelligence service to put itself a little nearer the centre of events that led to Bin Laden's killing.

Last week, a security official in Islamabad gave the Guardian details of three hitherto unknown ground missions conducted by joint CIA-Pakistani teams to capture Bin Laden.

One was in the north-western mountainous area of Chitral in 2005, though the target turned out to be a "near identical lookalike". Two were in 2006, including one in a village called Barabcha on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan's Baluchistan province.


A former US official confirmed there had been some joint operations in the past, particularly in Chitral, but was unaware of the specific incidents.

"The big picture is there have been cases where [the Pakistanis] have moved on information we have given them," said the former US official in Washington.

According to the Pakistani security official, efforts by Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) to capture Bin Laden continued even after "the intelligence chief of a western country came to us and gave us a written report Bin Laden was dead" – in 2008.

He also said the al-Qaida operative who eventually led the CIA to Bin Laden was identified as the terrorist leader's personal courier by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a senior detained militant in 2003, during interrogation by ISI. That information was passed to US agencies, he said.

This claim contradicts statements by US officials who say that Mohammed, the chief organiser of the 9/11 attacks, downplayed the importance of the courier, then known as Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, and that it took several more years for his true importance to be recognised.

Shaukat Qadir, a retired brigadier who has launched a personal investigation into the Bin Laden case, has also been boosting the perception of Pakistan's efforts as he prepares to publish a book on the subject. Based on briefings from intelligence officials, he said ISI had also been interested in Abbottabad in the months before the raid, and had even begun watching the man who would turn out to be al-Kuwaiti.

The agency became suspicious of the man, also known as Arshad Khan, when they ran a check on him after he told locals he had business interests in Peshawar, something that turned out to be false.

Their investigations became urgent when he was seen bulk-buying medicines in Peshawar useful for treating ailments Bin Laden was thought to suffer from.

"When they learned about the medicine, their suspicions were aroused and the passed those suspicions on to the CIA, probably around December 2010," he said.


Bruce Riedel, a former senior CIA analyst and expert on Islamist militancy, said ISI's three previous attempts to net Bin Laden "probably looked like wild goose chases from Washington's perspective".

"This is an effort by the Pakistanis to try to rebut the very widespread notion in the US that they must have been somehow willing accomplices of Bin Laden's presence in their country," he said.

Underlying the distrust between the two ostensible allies is the decision by the US not to share any of the material which the US Navy Seals took away from the house, including huge amounts of data on computer hard drives.

For its part, Pakistan is holding on to tens of thousands of documents taken from the Abbottabad house, although the Pakistani security official described these as mere "scraps" compared with the vast amount of information held by the US.

Some of the Pakistani-held documents are believed to have been seen by European and US intelligence services.

The Pakistani official said close counter-terror co-operation between the two sides was wrecked by the killing on the streets of Lahore of two Pakistani civilians by a CIA contractor, Raymond Davis, in January 2011.

"In 2009, there were 150 joint operations between us and the Americans, one every two days," he said. "Raymond Davis put a stop to everything."

But Riedel said Washington's suspicions of Pakistan ran far deeper. There was "near total consensus" within the administration not to share any intelligence on Bin Laden, despite the damage they knew it would do to US-Pakistani relations.

"My judgment is that if we had told the Pakistanis in anything but the last five minutes, Osama would be alive today," he said. "He would have escaped."

Muhammad Amir Rana, director of a thinktank that tracks security trends, said it is much too late for Pakistan to try to take credit for tracking Bin Laden. He said the time to "reconcile and share responsibility" was in the immediate aftermath, when Barack Obama publicly thanked Pakistan for its support. "Unfortunately, they badly miscalculated – they thought Osama was a big figure, they were worried about the reaction of al-Qaida and the public in Pakistan," he said.

But the wave of retaliatory attacks feared by some in Pakistan never happened, underling al-Qaida's enfeebled state.

Pakistan reveals efforts to hunt down Osama bin Laden | World news | The Guardian

Yes considering that so many high level AQ & Taliban commanders were flushed out for the US its improbable that Osama could've survived without any local help whatsoever ! Even in the best case scenario what ISI might've done is turn a blind eye towards him & let him roam in the country freely(as some reports suggest) at the same time tipping him off(possibly) when the US got too close to him.
The report I posted above pretty much debunks all your speculative arguments here.

1. Some Pakistanis say OBL wasn't there in Pakistan. (Conspiracy theorists)
2. Some Pakistanis say OBL was dead a long back. (again, conspiracy theorists. )
3. Some Pakistanis say we did not hide OBL. (LOL)
4. Some Pakistanis say he was there in Pakistan but we didn't know it. (Then why don't you kiss goodbye to your ISI which is not competent enough to find out the biggest terrorist living near the military academy?)
5. Some Pakistanis say OBL was there in Pakistan and we knew it. (Why are you saying it after 1 year? Why angry on USA's unilateral strike? Why don't you leave that doctor alone?)

what the hell is going on?
All of your relevant questions have been answered time and again, but Icarus and myself on this thread, as well as multiple other threads on the same topic in the months past.
 
.
The Pakistani intelligence services provided the United States with information that was helpful in learning more about the compound where Osama bin Laden was killed, a US official said Saturday.

"The Pakistanis didn't provide any tips on bin Laden, but they provided certain information that aided the United States in developing the American intelligence picture on the compound," said the official, who asked not to be identified.

"This was an American operation," the official added.

The official's comment came in response to a Washington Post report Saturday that said Pakistan's intelligence service believes it deserves credit for helping US intelligence agencies to locate bin Laden's hideout.

"The lead and the information actually came from us," an unnamed senior official with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) told The Post.

The al-Qaeda founder and 9/11 mastermind was killed on May 2 last year in a secret US Navy SEAL operation in a walled-off compound in the Pakistani garrison town of Abbottabad, north of the Pakistani capital.

Washington and Islamabad are now working to repair their relationship, which was badly damaged by the revelation that the world's most wanted man was living a stone's throw from Pakistan's elite military academy.

"Any hit on al-Qaeda anywhere in the world has happened with our help," The Post quotes one of the Pakistani intelligence officials as saying.

The other official, who said he had been intimately involved in the hunt for senior al-Qaeda operatives, including bin Laden, said the ISI provided the CIA with a cellphone number that eventually led to an al-Qaeda courier using the nom de guerre of Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, the paper said.

The officials said that in November 2010, they turned over the number to the CIA, along with information that it had last been detected in Abbottabad, the report said.

The ISI said it did not know then that the number was Kuwaiti's, but that CIA analysts did, without however relaying that information back to the Pakistanis, The Post reported.

"They knew who the number belonged to," the paper quoted one official as saying. "But after that their cooperation with us ended."

"It is the story of an extreme trust deficit and betrayal," complained the other ISI official, the paper said.

However, a US official disputed the ISI version, The Post said.

"The fact is, our knowledge of the number didn't come from them telling us about it," the paper quoted the US official as saying.

US official says Pakistan helped US find bin Laden - Emirates 24/7
 
.
^^^^^^
If it's too much for you to comprehend the let me make it easy for you......the whole OBL issue has been discussed to the bone, but since the first anniversary is coming up in a day or two, certain queries, discrepancies, allegations and all the cheap banter (Courtesy of guest members) is bound to crop up. The tabloids are bound to carry articles full of fresh theories, analysts, Q & A sessions and new allegations. A decade later, come 9/11 and it still makes front page news, however, since the OBL debacle happened inside Pakistan, the obsessive neighbours would be forever keen to muddy the waters.
Oh, since you are showing your affection towards the ISI, perhaps the likes of RAW should have set an example for failing to pick up a certain boat sailing right down it's throat. !!
 
.
Noone expecting that boat sailing from Pakistan to India. Just like noone expecting the planes to hit the WTC towers. So you can't compare it with your OBL fiasco, because Pakistan was one of the possible location of OBL presence. It was highly likely that he could be in Pakistan. He was living just a spit away from your military academy. That's the biggest intelligence failure I can think of.

Hope you understand the difference.
 
.
Noone expecting that boat sailing from Pakistan to India. Just like noone expecting the planes to hit the WTC towers. So you can't compare it with your OBL fiasco, because Pakistan was one of the possible location of OBL presence. It was highly likely that he could be in Pakistan. He was living just a spit away from your military academy. That's the biggest intelligence failure I can think of.

Hope you understand the difference.
No one expected OBL to hide in Abbottabad either, so while it was an Intel failure, it was not necessarily any worse than the US Intel failure in preventing the 911 attacks. As the article from the Guardian indicates, Pakistan was closing in on OBL, and would have tracked him down had the US not backstabbed Pakistan.

What exactly do your comments have to do with the thread topic?
 
.
No one expected OBL to hide in Abbottabad either, so while it was an Intel failure, it was not necessarily any worse than the US Intel failure in preventing the 911 attacks. As the article from the Guardian indicates, Pakistan was closing in on OBL, and would have tracked him down had the US not backstabbed Pakistan.
Pakistan was one of the possible location of OBL presence. That was my point. Your guy was comparing it with Mumbai attacks and boats. And now you're comparing it with 9/11. But you fail to see the difference.
1. Nobody was EXPECTING the planes to hit the twin towers. Nobody was EXPECTING the terrorists will come from Pakistan in the boat.
2. OBL was EXPECTED in Pakistan. He COULD BE present in Pakistan.

Now do you see the difference between the 1st and the 2nd point?
 
.
Pakistan was one of the possible location of OBL presence. That was my point. Your guy was comparing it with Mumbai attacks and boats. And now you're comparing it with 9/11. But you fail to see the difference.
1. Nobody was EXPECTING the planes to hit the twin towers. Nobody was EXPECTING the terrorists will come from Pakistan in the boat.
2. OBL was EXPECTED in Pakistan. He COULD BE present in Pakistan.

Now do you see the difference between the 1st and the 2nd point?
There is very little difference - the US did in fact have intelligence of a plot, and US interests had already been attacked, so the fact that a terrorist attack occurred despite the fact that US intelligence was looking (or should have been looking) for such an attack does point to an intel failure.

Similarly, while Pakistan was looking for OBL, the widespread consensus was that he was dead or somewhere in the tribal areas. The fact that he was hiding in Abbottabad did in fact come as a surprise.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom