What's new

Pakistan tests Hatf 9 Nasr Missile

Pakistan really needs to focus on long range missiles especially inter continental ballistic missiles. Aq khan had said that he couldve developed one for pakistan but he was stopped. An inter continental missiles would greatly enhance pakistan's global military position. I hope it would be done in the future

Does Pak Need to Attack USA ?

They Dont Need It.
Shaheen and Gauri are Enough for India.
 
. .
@XiNiX. No. What I am saying is that it lowers the threshold of use of nukes. Once a tactical is used the strategic ones are bound to be used. Hence, the thought of limited incursion should now be looked at from MAD perspective, hence, making such plans infeasible.

There was a growing thought in some Indian circles that limited incursions can be made without crossing the red line which would invoke a nuclear response from Pakistan. The purpose of Nasr is to discourage such plans/thought processes.
 
.
Well who says we need them for only india? If you have the capability then use it.

NO. BAD IDEA.

Invest Money on :

- Gen 4.5 / 5 Fighters
- Conventional Subs with SLBMs ( Like Israel )
- Purchase AWACS
- Purchase ABMs / SAMs

@XiNiX. No. What I am saying is that it lowers the threshold of use of nukes. Once a tactical is used the strategic ones are bound to be used. Hence, the thought of limited incursion should now be looked at from MAD perspective, hence, making such plans infeasible. There was a growing thought in some Indian circles that limited incursions can be made without crossing the red line which would invoke a nuclear response from Pakistan. The purpose of Nasr is to discourage such plans/thought processes

Well, Honestly I would Strongly Contradict.
Bilal, The Very Existance of TNWs is Offensive ( Due to Paks FIRST USE Policy ) to which ( in Indo-Pak Context ) There is ONLY one Answer - India Going for the TOTAL KILL.

India WILL NEVER STOP its Huge Army facing a Huge Border, for the fear of TNWs. Why Should They ?
They Know, Pakistan WILL NOT USE NASR ! NEVER .

You know, Once a Soviet Missile Regiment Major was Fired ( When he Chose NOT TO RETALIATE ) .. Though he CORRECTLY INTEPRETED a False Alarm from a Satellite....that ONE MISSILE ws coming towards USSR. He Said, he was Told in Training, If USA would Attack it will be Hundreds of Missiles.. NOT Just One. VERY TRUE.

So, Either NAsr CANNOT be used, or If you Want to Use.. Use Shaheeen/Gauri.
 
Last edited:
.
Hatf-9 Naval version might quite puzzling for India with extended range from 60 to 240km.
 
.
you know what is funny ... that even if we are vipe out instantly , you guys will not ... but you will die slowly , with radiation , dead corps , and other diseases ... and i would rather choose to die instantly rather than dying with nuclear radiation , starving , or with 100's of disease in my body ...best of luck in saving your few peoples who are already suffering and living in that 60% of your highly radiated land :tup:
Is japan today anything like what you described? Dont over estimate the potential of nukes.
 
.
Windy Mia,

Anti-India Video/News Dalna Tumhari Fitrat Hai.. Hamari Nahi.
Mai bhi Anti Pak 100 Video / News Dal Sakta Hu..... But Then What Difference will Exist between me and You ?
I dont Want to Ruin This Beautiful Forum. Its For Logical Discussion...

Anti-PAK Bolne se Lakh Achha hai .. Constructive Bolna....Bhaukna Nahi.

Mai bhi Aise 10 Video Post Kar Sakta Hu. Discussion can Take Place on a Particular Point.
Jab Tum Eidpur Kaho..... Hum Mehmoodpur Pahuch Jaye... To Discussion Nahi Hota...

The Original Point was, Testfire of Nasr in Response to Mars Mission.
My Video Showed That, This Had Happened Even Earlier, When the Rocket was Launched.
Bahi , kisi ney kisi ko roti khaney ki dawat di, agey sey jawab milla k main paan kha kar aya houn...... bhala iss baat mein aur aap ki masal mein koi tuk banti hey, mainey aapko eik fitry amal dikhaya aur aap janab meri fitrat ki tareef per uttar aye..... Since you are keen to accept one media source, why not the other.....alas, sometimes, you need to take grit with grain.
 
.
@XiNiX. As I said it's purpose is to deter. If God forbid it fails to deter and the time of usage comes it won't be one Nasr firing. It would be pretty much our whole arsenal. And hence, it's supposed to make the decision of making an incursion harder to take because now the nuclear threshold is much lower.
 
.
1. No need to. Targeting population centers and inflicting more damage than India can reciprocate is enough.

Is it Possible ? How ?
We Dont KNow the No. of Nukes on Either Side.

But We Do Know India has :

- More Reactors , More Plutnium
- More Money .. More Missiles
- Nuclear Subs .. Platform you CANT KILL, EVER.
- MIRV ( in A 5 )

The Geographical Area of Pakistan is FAR LESS !

Plz Enlighten Me.

Bahi , kisi ney kisi ko roti khaney ki dawat di, agey sey jawab milla k main paan kha kar aya houn...... bhala iss baat mein aur aap ki masal mein koi tuk banti hey, mainey aapko eik fitry amal dikhaya aur aap janab meri fitrat ki tareef per uttar aye..... Since you are keen to accept one media source, why not the other.....alas, sometimes, you need to take grit with grain.

Writing "Stories" and Not Answering the Points ( As Bilal , Rain and Deterance Have Done.. Thank You ) .. is Your Hobby...
Since You Asked, Will Posting an Indian Media Video Bashing Pakistan do Any Good ?

Im NOT here to Bash Pakistan ( Unlike you who is here to Bash ONLY India ).
But to Post MY OWN Views.

BTW,

"sometimes, you need to take grit with grain" = "bhala iss baat mein aur aap ki masal mein koi tuk banti hey"

Hatf-9 Naval version might quite puzzling for India with extended range from 60 to 240km.

Thanx for Joining.
Plz Explain How ?
 
Last edited:
.
Is it Possible ? How ?
We Dont KNow the No. of Nukes on Either Side.

But We Do Know India has :

- More Reactors , More Plutnium
- More Money .. More Missiles
- Nuclear Subs .. Platform you CANT KILL, EVER.
- MIRV ( in A 5 )

The Geographical Area of Pakistan is FAR LESS !

Plz Enlighten Me.
Yes it is: CounterValue targeting.

I'll quote the statement of French President de Gaulle here to convey my point:
"Within ten years, we shall have the means to kill 80 million Russians. I truly believe that one does not light-heartedly attack people who are able to kill 80 million Russians, even if one can kill 800 million French, that is if there were 800 million French."

In other words, India having more nukes/fissile material does not matter. You simply can't kill more Pakistanis than Indians because there aren't that much as compared to India.
 
.
Yes it is: CounterValue targeting.

I'll quote the statement of French President de Gaulle here to convey my point:


In other words, India having more nukes/fissile material does not matter. You simply can't kill more Pakistanis than Indians because there aren't that much as compared to India.

Lets NOT Deviate.
You Didnt Answer Me : Is it Possible to Annihilate India ? How ? ( Keeping the KNOWN factors in Place )

- More Reactors , More Plutonium
- More Money .. More Missiles
- Nuclear Subs .. Platform you CANT KILL, EVER.
- MIRV ( in A 5 )

Plz Explain.
 
.
Lets NOT Deviate.
You Didnt Answer Me : Is it Possible to Annihilate India ? How ? ( Keeping the KNOWN factors in Place )

- More Reactors , More Plutonium
- More Money .. More Missiles
- Nuclear Subs .. Platform you CANT KILL, EVER.
- MIRV ( in A 5 )

Plz Explain.

I did not deviate. I never said that its possible to annihilate India, nor I think like that.
 
. . . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom