What's new

Pakistan tests Hatf 9 Nasr Missile

Sorry to say but you are unable to grasp the concept of deterrence. Read up on it is all I can advise you.

Thats the Answer When YOU DONT HAVE an ANSWER !!
Dont Talk of Deterrence, It has NOTHING to do with Tactical Nukes.

The Problem is Bilal, You are Mixing the Tactical Nuke Term ( of 1960 ) and using it Alongside Indian Scenario & ( NFU ) Policy of 2015.
Both DONT FIT as i Explained Above and YOUR OWN COUNTRY MAN , UNDERSTOOD IT & RIGHTLY SAID :

India Policy of full retaliation would one day force Pakistan to adopt a policy of "clean sweep" in one single strike. With India second strike capability, Pakistan must decide to kill the beast with a suicide strike.

Maybe we even tested one after Tejas took to the air as well.


Kisi bewqouf ko glass milla tha aur woh bechara pani pee pee kar mar gaya tha......
You people have managed to send an orbiter to Mars.....good for you, but don't think the world has already started revolving around you.......certainly Jairam Ramesh wouldn't agree with you.

Windy Mia,

Idhar Udhar Mat Karo. Point p Baat Karo.
Jab Jawab Na Ho.. Chup Chap Khisak Lia Karo...
 
. .
Thats the Answer When YOU DONT HAVE an ANSWER !!
Dont Talk of Deterrence, It has NOTHING to do with Tactical Nukes.

The Problem is Bilal, You are Mixing the Tactical Nuke Term ( of 1960 ) and using it Alongside Indian Scenario & ( NFU ) Policy of 2015.
Both DONT FIT as i Explained Above and YOUR OWN COUNTRY MAN ,

On the contrary I have been answering and explaining that it's a deterrence to make the decision of a limited incursion harder to take. And in that it will play a successful role as a "deterrence". You are talking of usage scenarios where as the purpose of the deterrence is to deter and not allow the usage scenario to arise in the first place.
 
. .
@XiNiX, since you seem so fond of some media comments, here's something closer to heart.


Windy Mia,

Anti-India Video/News Dalna Tumhari Fitrat Hai.. Hamari Nahi.
Mai bhi Anti Pak 100 Video / News Dal Sakta Hu..... But Then What Difference will Exist between me and You ?
I dont Want to Ruin This Beautiful Forum. Its For Logical Discussion...

Anti-PAK Bolne se Lakh Achha hai .. Constructive Bolna....Bhaukna Nahi.

Mai bhi Aise 10 Video Post Kar Sakta Hu. Discussion can Take Place on a Particular Point.
Jab Tum Eidpur Kaho..... Hum Mehmoodpur Pahuch Jaye... To Discussion Nahi Hota...

The Original Point was, Testfire of Nasr in Response to Mars Mission.
My Video Showed That, This Had Happened Even Earlier, When the Rocket was Launched.
 
.
whatever make you happy......

We launched MOM....you fire nasr missile
MOM reached Mars......you fire nasr missile

Another PSLV being launched next month (carrying India's GPS satellite).....you will fire nasr missile again

whatever make you happy......
Then you shouldn't be so worried but whatever makes you happy nappy:D:D
 
.
Not going to end whole south asia... lol. Mostly 40% will be gone in India....pakistan will be vaporised with bio and chemical weapons along with nukes. Size does matter.

you know what is funny ... that even if we are vipe out instantly , you guys will not ... but you will die slowly , with radiation , dead corps , and other diseases ... and i would rather choose to die instantly rather than dying with nuclear radiation , starving , or with 100's of disease in my body ...best of luck in saving your few peoples who are already suffering and living in that 60% of your highly radiated land :tup:
 
.
On the contrary I have been answering and explaining that it's a deterrence to make the decision of a limited incursion harder to take. And in that it will play a successful role as a "deterrence". You are talking of usage scenarios where as the purpose of the deterrence is to deter and not allow the usage scenario to arise in the first place.

Are You Able to Read ?
This Thread is About a Tactical Missile - Nasr.

Nasr has NOTHING to do with DETTERANCE.
Its There TO BE USED AGAINST ANY LARGE ATTACK, EVEN CONVENTIONAL ATTACK !

INDIA Has NFU, so No Point in Talking about Tactical Nukes, They Wont Use It.

In Case of Pakistan, The Very Existence of Nsr is to Attack, if you Cant Defend a Massive Conventional Attack.
You are NOT Detering... You are Going for the Offence My Friend !

Nuclear Deterrence Means, Your Weapon , Deters me From Using Mine. Pakistan is NOT Detering INDIA with NAsr !
If You are refering to "Nuclear Threat" , Then Kid, "Nuclear Deterrence" =/= "Nuclear Threat" !!!!
 
. .
Are You Able to Read ?
This Thread is About a Tactical Missile - Nasr.

Nasr has NOTHING to do with DETTERANCE.
Its There TO BE USED AGAINST ANY LARGE ATTACK, EVEN CONVENTIONAL ATTACK !

INDIA Has NFU, so No Point in Talking about Tactical Nukes, They Wont Use It.

In Case of Pakistan, The Very Existence of Nsr is to Attack, if you Cant Defend a Massive Conventional Attack.
You are NOT Detering... You are Going for the Offence My Friend !

Nuclear Deterrence Means, Your Weapon , Deters me From Using Mine. Pakistan is NOT Detering INDIA with NAsr !
If You are refering to "Nuclear Threat" , Then Kid, "Nuclear Deterrence" =/= "Nuclear Threat" !!!!


I am able to read, thank you. But the question is are you able to comprehend. The purpose of NASR is to deter India from carrying out incursion into Pakistan by lower the nuclear threshold. How hard is it to understand.
 
.
Pakistan really needs to focus on long range missiles especially inter continental ballistic missiles. Aq khan had said that he couldve developed one for pakistan but he was stopped. An inter continental missiles would greatly enhance pakistan's global military position. I hope it would be done in the future
 
.
Then You Missed Them.

Read Again. 3 Types of Nukes were Deployed :
SRBMS , IRBMs and Battle Filed Tactical Nukes.



Btw, Which Missiles in Europe ? The Center Point was Jupiter Missiles in Turkey.
These were NOT Tactical Nukes but MRBMs.



These were later Removed as a part of the Secret Deal.
Kya Baat Hai Imran Bhai...

Pakistan Ki Jhaante Mars Pe Ugi Hai... ??? Ha Ha... Sale Chinese ne Jhaantoo me bhi JV Kar dia Kya ??
Gaand to Pakistan me Hai naa ???

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:



May I ask WHY ?

Plus,

#1. You Stand CORRECTED on the Existance of Tactical Nukes in Cuba
#2. You Stand CORRECTED on NON Existance of Tactical Nukes in Europe


Hehe... lol
 
.
beta TBH

manglyan pakistan ki jhaant bhi nhi ukhaar sakta

per ye missile gand phar de ga war time :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
bete , Manglyan ko pakistan ki jhaat ukhaarne nahi Gaand jalaane ke liye bejha tha. aur tera comment dekhkar lagta hai Mangalyan ne pure pakistan ki Gaand me aag laga di hai:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
I am able to read, thank you. But the question is are you able to comprehend. The purpose of NASR is to deter India from carrying out incursion into Pakistan by lower the nuclear threshold. How hard is it to understand.

Bilal, As i Rightly Understood.

You are Mixing , "Nuclear Threat" with "Nuclear Deterrence" ( aka "Nuclear Holocaust" aka "MAD" ).
Very Very Different Meanings.

You Mean to Suggest, If im Correct that Nasr can Stop India from Crossing Borders. ( Now My Friend This is Nuclear THREAT , NOT Nuclear DETERRENCE ! )

Btw..It Wont.

Reason : India Knows Nasr ( Nuclear Threat ) Wont be Ever Used ( Naive.. True, But... Its Logical )
As India Will Use Massive Nuclear Retaliation even Again a Single Nuclear Strike by NAsr and we Comeback to the Old Statement of Mine.. DONT WOUND the TIGER, KILL IT 100% ( Which You Cant ).

So its No Point Using Nasr.
Use Shaheen/Gauri if you wanna Go Nuclear. ( But Again As i Said, Its Foolish as you CANT KILL SLBMS.. ) But Then Again Its a Suicide.

Thats Why USA Concluded ( Way back in 1960s ) This as MAD = Mutually Assured Destruction !!!
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom