What's new

Pakistan takes lead role on behalf of OIC at UNHRC against Myanmar government

That's implying there is a "East" Pakistan, which there isn't. There is only Pakistan.

Using that term since you brought east west Pakistan thingy. In any case Pakistan exists and it should support rohingyas. Be a leader even in it. No harm would happen to Pakistan out of it.

I'm not against helping them. Just saying we shouldn't do more than we're capable of. The fact that we even have Rohingia refugees, and that too more than Saudi, is astonishing considering we don't even border Myanmar. I don't recall Bangladesh taking in Afghan refugees in the 1980's.

We aren't even doing what we are capable of. Saudi are further away from Myanmar and has 200k refugees. That is astonishing too. But it surely needs to do a lot lot more.

For the most part they are because again, BD borders Myanmar.

Still doesn't make it only BD issue. It is a humanitarian issue.

We shouldn't do more than we can afford to.

We are not even doing what we can afford to.
 
.
Using that term since you brought east west Pakistan thingy. In any case Pakistan exists and it should support rohingyas. Be a leader even in it. No harm would happen to Pakistan out of it.
I'm talking about in the context of then East Pakistan (when it did exist).

Sorry but Pakistan is not in a position to lead.


We aren't even doing what we are capable of.
Bro, there are slums in Karachi filled with Rohingia refugees who don't even have proper living facilities. So what the hell do you mean we aren't doing what we're "capable" of? You can't even provide them proper shelter and bathrooms to cleanse themselves therefore you are not capable.

And that's besides the 8 million illegal Bangalis who are also living in squalor in Karachi. Since when did Pakistan become a giant refugee slum?

Arakanabad Slum in Karachi:

14879957_G.jpg

Still doesn't make it only BD issue. It is a humanitarian issue..
It is mostly a BD issue. They border Myanmar.


We are not even doing what we can afford to.
Because we can't afford to.
 
.
And that's besides the 8 million illegal Bangalis who are also living in squalor in Karachi. Since when did Pakistan become a giant refugee slum?

8 million Bengalis in Karachi? :woot:

Dude, at least use some logic when sprouting numbers out of thin air.
 
.
.
Sorry but Pakistan is not in a position to lead.

It can and it should.

Bro, there are slums in Karachi filled with Rohingia refugees who don't even have proper living facilities. So what the hell do you mean we aren't doing what we're "capable" of? You can't even provide them proper shelter and bathrooms to cleanse themselves therefore you are not capable.


Looks a slum that are common all over Pakistan with Pakistanis living in them. They are safe from genocide and persecution that is the priority. More should be given to them. And if Pakistan can't afford it then it should ask help from other wealthy muslim countries.

And that's besides the 8 million illegal Bangalis who are also living in squalor in Karachi.

2 million actually. Don't exaggerate. And even they include these 300k rohingyas too.

It is mostly a BD issue. They border Myanmar.

It is a humanitarian issue. That why it is being discussed in UN.

Because we can't afford to.

Well surely we can. But then we have been pussies for past many years.
 
.
This is reflecting bad on BD more than anything - It should be BD responsibility to take lead role considering that apart from being the only muslim country that physically borders them but esp the fact that the rohingya are ethnically bengalis.
 
.
It can and it should.
It can't and it should not


Looks a slum that are common all over Pakistan with Pakistanis living in them. They are safe from genocide and persecution that is the priority. More should be given to them. And if Pakistan can't afford it then it should ask help from other wealthy muslim countries.
:lol: you say that like it's a good thing. Let's turn Pakistani cities into giant slums with people defecating everywhere. Sounds logical.

They are safe from genocide and persecution that is the priority
Bangladesh is pretty safe. They can all go there.

2 million actually. Don't exaggerate. And even they include these 300k rohingyas too.
Still too many. They got their country in 1971 and should all be sent there.

It is a humanitarian issue. That why it is being discussed in UN.
Then the whole world should get involved with the wealthy countries in the lead.


Well surely we can. But then we have been pussies for past many years.
No we can't.

This is reflecting bad on BD more than anything - It should be BD responsibility to take lead role considering that apart from being the only muslim country that physically borders them but esp the fact that the rohingya are ethnically bengalis.
Exactly what I have been saying. I don't recall Bangladesh taking in Afghan refugees in the 1980's when we bore the brunt of Afghan refugees (and still do) so why are we taking up responsibility for their refugees??
 
Last edited:
.
It can't and it should not

Cowardice. Don't share the same cowardice as yours. Sorry.

:lol: you say that like it's a good thing. Let's turn Pakistani cities into giant slums with people defecating everywhere. Sounds logical.

I never said that. Stop putting words in my mouth.

Bangladesh is pretty safe. They can all go there.

They are already going to BD. You should also cut down on your obsession with BD.

Still too many. They got their country in 1971 and should all be sent there.

Non issue for now. Issue is to stop genocide that is happening in Myanmar. We can talk about these issues later.

Then the whole world should get involved with the wealthy countries in the lead.

They surely need to involve more.

No we can't.

Cowardly stuff. Not interested.
 
.
Cowardice. Don't share the same cowardice as yours. Sorry.
Don't project your own personality onto others.


I never said that. Stop putting words in my mouth.
That's what you want though right? Or do you plan on storing all of those refugees in your basement?

They are already going to BD.
And they should stay there.

Non issue for now. Issue is to stop genocide that is happening in Myanmar. We can talk about these issues later.
Bangladesh can help it's own ethnic kinsmen.

They surely need to involve more.
No doubt about that.

Cowardly stuff. Not interested.
Stop projecting again.
 
.
It can't and it should not



:lol: you say that like it's a good thing. Let's turn Pakistani cities into giant slums with people defecating everywhere. Sounds logical.


Bangladesh is pretty safe. They can all go there.


Still too many. They got their country in 1971 and should all be sent there.


Then the whole world should get involved with the wealthy countries in the lead.



No we can't.


Exactly what I have been saying. I don't recall Bangladesh taking in Afghan refugees in the 1980's when we bore the brunt of Afghan refugees (and still do) so why in the flying ***k are we taking up responsibility for their refugees??

It's pathetic that pakistan and turkey have taken the lead. BD has proved itself to be a lame duck as far as myanmar is concerned they are asking for a pat on the back for taking in such a small number of their OWN BD ORIGIN PEOPLE (only around 600k) and that too they've only been hosting them for a very short time.
Pakistan,iran,turkey,jordan,germany and even tiny lebanon hosted MILLIONS of refugees for much longer BD is nowhere near the level of hospitality that these countries have shown.
 
.
It's pathetic that pakistan and turkey have taken the lead. BD has proved itself to be a lame duck as far as myanmar is concerned they are asking for a pat on the back for taking in such a small number of their OWN BD ORIGIN PEOPLE (only around 600k) and that too they've only been hosting them for a very short time.
Pakistan,iran,turkey,jordan,germany and even tiny lebanon hosted MILLIONS of refugees for much longer BD is nowhere near the level of hospitality that these countries have shown.
The BD government is arrogant AF. They can't even take in their own ethnic people and yet boast about Bangali Nationalism and taunt Pakistan for the alleged "genocide" of 1971 in a false show of nationalist bravado. What a fucking joke.

Also it's extremely pathetic to see some Pakistanis willing to handout Pakistan's land to anyone as if Pakistan is their fathers private refugee camp or something. No sense of national loyalty in these people. No wonder the world takes us for a free ride.
 
.
The BD government is arrogant AF. They can't even take in their own ethnic people and yet boast about Bangali Nationalism and taunt Pakistan for the alleged "genocide" of 1971 in a false show of nationalist bravado. What a fucking joke.

Also it's extremely pathetic to see some Pakistanis willing to handout Pakistan's land to anyone as if Pakistan is their fathers private refugee camp or something. No sense of national loyalty in these people. No wonder the world takes us for a free ride.

If we are taking so many rohingya then while we're at it we should also take back all biharis from BD which should have been done long ago.
 
.
If we are taking so many rohingya then while we're at it we should also take back all biharis from BD which should have been done long ago.
The Biharis are the only people who still wave a Pakistani flag in that part of the world. But our Pakistani ummah advocates will place ethnic Bangalis before them. Why have we not brought those people back to Pakistan yet?
 
Last edited:
.
i still believe we should do what we can donate food, money, first aid, clothes etc even pray, whatever we can. Today its rohingya tomorroww it be us.

This all noise everyone is making about who should be taking them in, should be taken up to diplomats, politicians etc. why is no one mentioning gas and oil in maynamar, - George soros funded chaos etc.
 
.
.
Back
Top Bottom