What's new

Pakistan Succesful Test Fired Hatf-VIII Ra'ad ALCM

Pakistan doesn't have an enemy 5000KM away from our borders. Pakistan stopped extending its missile range after we had achieved maximum needful depth against our enemy.

Now the question to ask would be, if Ra'ad the same version of was that improved one? I had learned that Pakistan was working to reduce height of Babur so its ground hugging capability and hence ability to stay out of possible tracking would improve.
 
.
Pakistan doesn't have an enemy 5000KM away from our borders. Pakistan stopped extending its missile range after we had achieved maximum needful depth against our enemy.

Now the question to ask would be, if Ra'ad the same version of was that improved one? I had learned that Pakistan was working to reduce height of Babur so its ground hugging capability and hence ability to stay out of possible tracking would improve.
Sir we are working on ICBMs
 
.
Even if Pakistan is working or has ICBMs. I don't expect them to disclose this information. It's in their national interest not to, because who wants to shoot themselves in the foot. Any Pakistani knows that revealing this info. would lead to possible isolation and sanctions.
 
.
No PR29/2015-ISPR Dated: February 2, 2015
Rawalpindi - February 2, 2015:
Pakistan conducted a successful Flight Test of the indigenously developed Air Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) "Ra'ad".
image_resize.aspx
 
. .
Pakistan doesn't have an enemy 5000KM away from our borders. Pakistan stopped extending its missile range after we had achieved maximum needful depth against our enemy.

Now the question to ask would be, if Ra'ad the same version of was that improved one? I had learned that Pakistan was working to reduce height of Babur so its ground hugging capability and hence ability to stay out of possible tracking would improve.
what about isreal ? isn't it our enemy ?
 
. .
Pakistan+Successfully+Tests+Hatf-VIII+Ra%25E2%2580%2599ad+Air-Launched+Cruise+Missile+%25286%2529.jpg


image_resize.aspx


Compared to the previous system (Top), one can clearly see that the missile tested today has additional features under the nose. Also note in the footage @ 0.20, how the missile changes attitude and dives down to treetop level into ground hugging mode.
 
. . .
Pakistan+Successfully+Tests+Hatf-VIII+Ra%25E2%2580%2599ad+Air-Launched+Cruise+Missile+%25286%2529.jpg


image_resize.aspx


Compared to the previous system (Top), one can clearly see that the missile tested today has additional features under the nose. Also note in the footage @ 0.20, how the missile changes attitude and dives down to treetop level into ground hugging mode.
That is a pitot tube which has been there since first version.
But on top of the missile there seems to be further additions compared to previous versions.
 
.
Yes.



5X submarines including AIP, each can carry 16X babur if needed in torpedo tubes. However such a load out is unlikely to be allocated to a sub crew.



We have partial triad because we don't have an SSBN. We are working towards that end, slowly but steadily.



Yes by AERO formerly known as Air Weapons Complex.



While designing this system Indian radar capabilities are kept in mind though i can't give you a specific answer to this question.



India and Pakistan test missiles around the same time not because of tit for tat posture but because they get money allocated to them around the same time and the climate is suitable for testing around the same time due to geographic proximity.

No it is not, Babur has not been configured to be fired from subs yet.

Agosta have never test fired Babur missiles.

Neither the design modification (additional booster required to propel the missile out of water) has been added.
 
.
ho ga to test kareen gy na bhai

Imran Pakistan was working on ICBM even before India after 2001 but because of US threatening to Mush regime over Pakistan Nuclear Program like Libya, Mush regime rollback ICBM project. Pakistan lost in ICBM race @ that time unfortunately because of fear of sanctions.
 
.
No it is not, Babur has not been configured to be fired from subs yet.

Agosta have never test fired Babur missiles.

Neither the design modification (additional booster required to propel the missile out of water) has been added.
Agosta will never "Publicly" fire Babur due to political reasons. Many cages will be rattled and some contracts may be violated with France as Agosta is not our sub. Its made under licence.
There may be some clause in the licence barring nuclear role.
 
.
Agni-5 is a 50 ton fatty which can never be a true road mobile missile.
Look around,all road mobile missiles in the world are less than 30 tons. Same as Pakistan's shaheen 2

If Chinese DF-41 missile weighing over 80 Tonnes is road mobile, you can bet your Agni 5 is road mobile too.

attachment.php


Agosta will never "Publicly" fire Babur due to political reasons. Many cages will be rattled and some contracts may be violated with France as Agosta is not our sub. Its made under licence.
There may be some clause in the licence barring nuclear role.


Well then as a defence enthusiast, you have no way of proving, Babur can be fired from Agostas.

Besides if Babur would have been ever fired from a sub, somewhere, something would have come out.

For example when Israelis tested popeye SLCM missiles from their German subs, Americans recorded the test and leaked it.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom