What's new

Pakistan slams Pentagon, summons US ambassador over report accusing it of harbouring terrorist

.
Complex bilateral relationships such as the one between Pakistan and USA are never as binary as that, Sir.

I dont think, thats valid here at least. The commanders knowing the situation on ground, acknowledge the progress made against the Haqqanis in the recent operatoins, the Pentagon doesn't. It still wishes to criticize Pakistan, for its other business on the Line of Control. That shouldn't be the U.S concern. What exactly, are you looking to bargain for?
 
.
I dont think, thats valid here at least. The commanders knowing the situation on ground, acknowledge the progress made against the Haqqanis in the recent operatoins, the Pentagon doesn't. It still wishes to criticize Pakistan, for its other business on the Line of Control. That shouldn't be the U.S concern. What exactly, are you looking to bargain for?

Sir, the commanders on the ground can provide their input, as they are doing in this case too, but the Pentagon takes many other inputs to come up with a more complex plan, and one that must serve the political decisions made by the US Government, which has global concerns to deal with as the superpower.
 
.
For what purpose?
apologies for missing the intended prefix NOT

lol that is embarrassing.
what I meant was that all suspected training / terror sites must be examined so that they can be dismantled in the host country. but such initiate shouldn't be used to gather intelligence against legitimate defence sites
 
.
I will repeat again.

Why does US never present this evidence publicly and at the UN? Where is the evidence to support these claims?

Well. Is there any written proof that ur Army is more powerful than ur civilian govt? Is it written anywhr that on foreign policies pertaining to Army, civilians have no locus standi?

Are you saying there is no evidence to prove the allegations against Pakistan?
 
.
Technically It is jamat ud dawa HQ in muridke not LeT
Bottomline still stays that you support use terrorist.
If you look at technicality, its leader hafiz sayeed is a wanted terrorist by UN and also has a bounty on his head. But your country supports and aids him.
 
.
I will repeat again.

Why does US never present this evidence publicly and at the UN? Where is the evidence to support these claims?

Are you saying there is no evidence to prove the allegations against Pakistan?

Question is will Pak ever accept? Has it ever accepted? Fuget bout evidence. Why do you think after directly rejecting in da start, finally Pakistan accepted its ppls role in 26/11. What do u think it was? Dint Pak establishment knew b4?
Its very convinient 4 u guyz.U guyz want others to prove crimes of ur citizens without any sincere help. If anyhow proven straightforwardly reject it until its by ur age old aid providers.

What shud the world do to u guyz?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom