Gabbar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 2,118
- Reaction score
- 0
Seriously .. This guy is an "Elite" member!!
I know, I was thinking same thing. How do you respond to c**p like this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously .. This guy is an "Elite" member!!
Seriously .. This guy is an "Elite" member!!
I know, I was thinking same thing. How do you respond to c**p like this?
So this all you got. My logic make sense. Isn't it?
just because few islamic terrorist blew themselves up one should kick muslim across half the way across the globe.
Does this make any sense.
Every thing and all thing revolved around reverse effect. India is huge nation with Hindu majority so when you guys show your muscle power over minority Muslims then don't expect us to be angle. There are hard headed people in every country and society.
Some kid ranting about demolishing sacred places?Buhahha.... u on drugs pal?
I bet no religious places would be damaged by GOP.... but here its a matter of sarkari land or govt land alloted to some gurudwara which wasnt in use and army bought it from the govt..... same stuff happened to other mosques but its not a big deal frankly! its just some piece of unused land purchased.
Sorry mate, the Sikh empire never extended beyond the Sutlej river and delhi is too far from sutlej river and yes sikhs were defeated at Jamrud where the tribes gave them fierce battle. The Sikhs were defeated and retreated in 1837. It was here that they lost their renowned General Hari Singh Nalwa, So the sikh never occupied any tribal area or part of puktunkhwa except peshawar valley.
And whats with small minority, muslims were also minority and ruled 1000 years and their empire was 30 times bigger than 10 year rule of Sikh empire
Sorry to bust your bubble dude, you didn't take province from pushtun, The Sikhs’ rule was restricted around Peshawar and was not stable. They “possessed but little influence in the trans-Indus tracts, and what influence they had was confined to the plains. Even here they were obeyed only in the immediate vicinity of their forts which studded the country”. The tribesmen checked the advance of Sikhs and safeguarded their independence as always in the past
Final note: The sikh were only able to occupy peshawar bannu of pushtun and nothing more, Mere 10 year rule of peshawar doesn't makes this history to remember
Tribal areas were included in British Raj after the establishment of Durand Line, No power in the world has been able to occupy Tribal areas of Pakistan, British Empire who was Superpower fought there for 60 years and they were not able to occupy Waziristan, it was one of the most militarised zone of the world and what makes you think ranjith’s mercenary army could have occupied even an inch of waziristan. Except Peshawar valley they were not able to occupy any pushtun land
Do you really think the sikhs would have continued to rule a region where 70% population was muslim and half of its army was muslim, even if british had not destroyed sikh empire, it was bound to be disintegrated after the death of ranjith,
The Punjabi literature and poetry were written by punjabi sufi saints it is a muslim language not a sikh language, it arose way before sikhism arose so the sikh doesn't have any right to lecture muslim punjabi whether he speaks punjabi or not, Sikhs are just the speakers of our language.
If the land is unused I don't see any problem in using it in development works, I'm not sure what use Army will do with the land though.
Same applies to Mandir, Masjid etc.