What's new

Pakistan says Indian ballistic missile system a destabilizing development.

Because the nuclear war isn't only limited to the initial blast at ground zero !

Delusions , too much , eh ! :D Somehow , India will emerge a victor in a nuclear exchange and create history . :lol: These talks of Balkanization do not look good from you , sorry .



The point was simple , he wasn't the only one warning of a nuclear war .

What was 71 then ??:lol:
 
The same as '47 :D

The trolling habit doesn't go from your lot , now does it ? :azn: Bring out things which aren't related in any way to the thread .

This is not of topic , you aske about balkanisation and henec I reminded you about 71_

In 47 there was no war and no foreign country had invaded India , and no one dictated terms, it was mutually acceptable. I actually think it was good riddance.
 
This is not of topic , you aske about balkanisation and henec I reminded you about 71_

Indeed this is off topic , what sort of Balkanization did you refer to after the nuclear war when people will be fighting tooth and nail to even remain alive ? Let alone , form Govts and run states .

Actually , we think the same " It was good riddance " .
 
Indeed this is off topic , what sort of Balkanization did you refer to after the nuclear war when people will be fighting tooth and nail to even remain alive ? Let alone , form Govts and run states .


What are you talking about , India is not island country like Japan. At most you would be able to take out some cities and some strategic locations and nothing more than that.
But being small Pakistan will be more affected and hence loose the war.
 
But being small Pakistan will be more affected and hence loose the war.

If it helps you sleep at night , yeah :D

Since you do not understand that there are no victors in a nuclear war . Otherwise , even Russia is bigger than US in land area , so what ?
 
If it helps you sleep at night , yeah :D

Since you do not understand that there are no victors in a nuclear war . Otherwise , even Russia is bigger than US in land area , so what ?
It's different in our case sir.
Their combined nuke warhead number is in the excess of 15000 and not like our 200kt small nukes.
They have real destruction power of 100Mt bombs like Tsar.

Our case is very different.
 
Our case is very different.

No it isn't . Your argument is wrong to say the least in its fundamentals , nuclear war is not won by having bigger land areas because actually it is just not possible to win it in the first place , research the long term effects of fallout . Going by your logic , If they have more destructive power in the form of megaton nukes , then they also have much bigger land areas to target , look at the respective sizes of Russia and US in km2 .

Else , what would the experts call it a " mutually assured destruction " ? A country will not survive and maintain its integrity as a country when its large population centers are taken out amongst other areas and the remaining will be facing a nuclear winter from the dust carried by the winds and that would be for 1000's of years .
 
No it isn't . Your argument is wrong to say the least in its fundamentals , nuclear war is not won by having bigger land areas because actually it is just not possible to win it in the first place , research the long term effects of fallout . Going by your logic , If they have more destructive power in the form of megaton nukes , then they also have much bigger land areas to target , look at the respective sizes of Russia and US in km2 .

Else , what would the experts call it a " mutually assured destruction " ? A country will not survive and maintain its in tegrity as a country when its large population centers are taken out amongst other areas and the remaining will be facing a nuclear winter from the dust carried by the winds and that would be for 1000's of years .

Radioactive parts carried by Wind also has very limited region to propagate hence the fallout would do so only till distance of of max 10 km not more than that for 200kt bombs in the dir of wind and that area would remain as quartined zone for ever .

Very very large area will remain unaffected and hence winning coutry will balkanise the looser country.
 
PAD - Exo atmospheric

Both Endo and Exo BMD's will be launched against any incoming BM - researchers claim a 99.8% kill ratio in this configuration.

What about fighter jet launched nukes ??And obviously cruise missiles.
 
What about fighter jet launched nukes ??And obviously cruise missiles.

pakistan dont have that Capability

:lazy:


india does it can use the mki and the mirage 2000 and later on it can use rafale

also they are developing harbanspather missile series that are hypersonic and with a range of about 1500km with a payload of 300kt nuke
 
What about fighter jet launched nukes ??And obviously cruise missiles.

This system is meant for Short to Medium Ballistic missiles, for fighter jets - of course there's our air force and a triple layer air defense system.
 
This system is meant for Short to Medium Ballistic missiles, for fighter jets - of course there's our air force and a triple layer air defense system.

Triple layer air defence system ??When did this happen ??

also they are developing harbanspather missile series that are hypersonic and with a range of about 1500km with a payload of 300kt nuke

Who ??Is Pakistan developing those missiles ??
 

Back
Top Bottom