What's new

Pakistan’s nuclear and missile assets -- myth vs reality

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistan’s nuclear assets -- myth vs reality
By Farhan Bokhari

As Pakistan’s internal politics become increasingly uncertain ahead of parliamentary elections next month, there have been a spate of articles in mainstream Western newspapers recently targeting the country’s nuclear program.

Worst-case scenarios have been painted around themes ranging from the dangerous consequences of a Taleban take-over of Pakistan (envisaging a scenario wherein for the first time, a hardline regime is in possession of nuclear weapons) to the possibility of the country getting exposed yet again to the risk of further proliferation of nuclear material through the global nuclear bazaar.

That Pakistan’s nuclear program has been controversial due to the episode surrounding Abdul Qadeer Khan, the country’s revered nuclear scientist who was discredited for his illicit dealings, is indeed well documented. But the situation in the country has changed significantly, prompting calls for a fresh assessment on the ground. In short, the Pakistan of today is just not the Pakistan of the past.

Since the controversy surrounding Khan erupted almost four years ago, Pakistan’s structure of nuclear management has been significantly transformed. The country’s nuclear establishment has overseen the induction of improved standards across the board. New safeguards have been applied for taking charge of nuclear assets in a variety of ways, ranging from closer monitoring of up to 2,000 individuals who hold key positions in the nuclear establishment to the enforcement of safe practices such as a two-man rule, which essentially means that key decisions in the use of nuclear materials will never be left to any individual.

Takeover

Besides, scenarios such as the danger of a Taleban takeover are just too far-fetched to become part of a serious discourse.

For years Pakistan has been widely seen as a country which has seen a stark rise in the number of Taleban-type militants. The present anxieties in the Western world are probably fuelled by the reality of Taleban-type Islamists ruling the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) for the past five years. As key partners in a ruling provincial coalition, those Islamists have also held sway over the provincial government in the south western Balochistan province.

The truth, however, is that these two provinces represent well below 20 per cent of Pakistan’s population of 165 million -- a fact which is often ignored when political analysts blindly contemplate the Taleban sweeping through Pakistan and taking charge not only of the country but also of its nuclear assets.

Further reassurance for the anti-nuclear proliferation lobby must be the fact that the management of Pakistan’s nuclear assets lies squarely in the hands of the armed forces.

Unlike political governments which can be voted in or out of office, the Pakistan army as an institution provides consistency in managing nuclear assets.

Uncertainty

This is a reality which is central to a country that has faced recurring political uncertainty, infighting and unexpected changes in regimes.

Among other relevant developments, one is indeed the extent to which Pakistan has made progress towards the indigenous development of at least some of its smaller-sized nuclear reactors. By 2009, the commissioning of two more small-to-moderate sized nuclear reactors in Khushab, central Punjab, will inevitably add to the existing capability of the military’s nuclear arsenal. The two reactors which will add to an existing one (also located at Khushab) will enable Pakistan to consolidate its nuclear weapons program and improve the quality of its nuclear deterrent.

As Pakistan next year celebrates the 10th anniversary of its maiden nuclear tests in 1998, the country’s stockpile of nuclear weapons presents not just a source of danger but indeed a reason for stability.

During this time, Pakistan has twice come close to an all-out war with India. As two nuclear armed states, Pakistan and India avoided an all-out conflict, knowing that a wider clash would be mutually destructive.

As the barrage of stringent criticism builds up against Pakistan, cynics and critics often ignore an obvious point, as some contemplate the possibility of an all-out attack to neutralize the country’s nuclear assets.

Pakistan’s nuclear program has developed to such an extent that its complete elimination in a short time span, which gives no chance to Islamabad to retaliate, is nothing but a pipedream. Rather than entertain hopes for wiping out Pakistan’s nuclear plans, the global community may end up serving its own interests by recognizing the reality of Pakistan as a nuclear state. A reality which is not going to change.
Farhan Bokhari is a Pakistan-based commentator who writes on political and economic matters.

(Source: Gulf News)
 
Hi Fatman,

Indeed pakistan's nuclear program has reached that stage where a simple special forces or a so called joint action won't happen. But what if the world decides to offer a very bi carrot to pakistan.

Waive off, all of pakistan's debts, major investment in all the fields, heavy investment in the infrastructure, 250-300 first line multi role strkie aircraft etec etc etc. A pact with india of total non-aggression, solution of kashmir issue once for all and many more items.

Instead of printing articles that bring out anger and retaliation, the issue should have been discussed in a more friendlier manner and pakistan approached differently. But now the genie is out of the bag. There has been too much reaction from both the sides. For pakistan, there is too much at stake and america may have showed its hand too soon.
 
I also believe by putting so much focus on the Pakistani Nukes.. they are trying to insinuate the Pakistanis to secure them in effect getting what they want..

Attacks won't secure them.. I think it is implausible, impossible, illogical and illfated..

Asking Pakistanis to secure them would be met with --> yeah they are secure **** off and if Pakistan acknowledges weakness would be a major dampener to Pakistan

Threatening to attack them will increase their security (+ I think US has already offered them some assisstance of this sort in the past.) so they will tighten the screws and keep Pakistan and Pakistani public in check and keep the extremists at bay..
 
Hi Fatman,

Indeed pakistan's nuclear program has reached that stage where a simple special forces or a so called joint action won't happen. But what if the world decides to offer a very bi carrot to pakistan.

Waive off, all of pakistan's debts, major investment in all the fields, heavy investment in the infrastructure, 250-300 first line multi role strkie aircraft etec etc etc. A pact with india of total non-aggression, solution of kashmir issue once for all and many more items.

Instead of printing articles that bring out anger and retaliation, the issue should have been discussed in a more friendlier manner and pakistan approached differently. But now the genie is out of the bag. There has been too much reaction from both the sides. For pakistan, there is too much at stake and america may have showed its hand too soon.

I am all for it! but dont you think ensuring ones own security by having your own indigenous assets (nuclear in this case) is the best bet. i am not a advocate for the use of thermo-nuclear weapons but in our case, we r located in a tough neighbourhood. so the mere existence of such weaqpons is ensuring the peace.
 
We achieved nuclear technology after great sacrifices by pakistan and its people. And all of this was not done for just to let it go for some kind of assurance from the west. We already suffered the cost once for relying on the west in 71.I'm sure we do not want to suffer it again. Remember until we had not tested our nuclear weapons, the same india who now wants to conclude a no first nuclear use policy with pakistan, actually threatend to use it. Kashmir is not the only issue of dispute between the two nations, even if its solved there are just too many differences in the thinking of both the nations, a complete different ideology. Giving up nuclear technology against a much superior enemy and that too who has nuclear weapons will be like living at their mercy and pakistan was not meant for that.
 
Hi Fatman,

I am with you 100% on that. The world needs to start treating us a little nicer. We are not bad people. As a matter of fact we are very good and friendly people. We are sincere in our efforts to help others as the need maybe.

The world needs to bring out the better side of us----but what I am looking at is that most of them are trying to portray a very negative picture of my motherland and that is not nice. If you keep calling somebody as a bad person---then that is what you get.

And as Musharraf stated that we are not a thrid world power---we are a nuclear capable power and we must be treated with respect.

Fatman, what seperates the men from the boys---is the price of their toys. Pakistan is no longer a part of the boys club anymore. If the world wants a responsible pakistan---then it must make responsible statements, threatening pakistan would not solve or resolve any issues.
 
Hi Fatman,

I am with you 100% on that. The world needs to start treating us a little nicer. We are not bad people. As a matter of fact we are very good and friendly people. We are sincere in our efforts to help others as the need maybe.

The world needs to bring out the better side of us----but what I am looking at is that most of them are trying to portray a very negative picture of my motherland and that is not nice. If you keep calling somebody as a bad person---then that is what you get.

And as Musharraf stated that we are not a thrid world power---we are a nuclear capable power and we must be treated with respect.

Fatman, what seperates the men from the boys---is the price of their toys. Pakistan is no longer a part of the boys club anymore. If the world wants a responsible pakistan---then it must make responsible statements, threatening pakistan would not solve or resolve any issues.


My Dear MK,

I again couldnt agree with you more but getting acceptance from the Big-Powers is not so easy. Even a country like India which is being portrayed as the next super-power is having difficulties getting into these exclusive clubs like permanent membership of the UN, Big-8/9, etc.

We certainly need a good brush-up of our image abroad and the GoP needs to work on this in a organised and sustained manner (India does this well). once everyone realises this these threats will subside (will take a few years)

Along with our toys we need to be strong economically also. we can feed the world. we have vast potential to be a exporter of wheat, rice and fruits and vegetables ($ 1.0 bill only in fruits & vegs) the previous govt has done a lot of spade work in this area and i hope this work continues.

Such actions will bring automatic recognition. Musharraf realises this. do our politicians?
 
A very balanced analysis (high level) of the Pakistani nuclear program.

Outside View: Pakistan's cruise missile

Published: Dec. 13, 2007 at 2:28 PM
Print story
Email to a friend
Font size:
By PYOTR GONCHAROV
UPI Outside View Commentator
MOSCOW, Dec. 13 (UPI) -- Pakistan has announced that it successfully tested a cruise missile with a range of 435 miles on Tuesday. Presumably the Hatf-VII, or Babur, missile can carry both conventional and nuclear weapons.

How should the international community react to this, especially as it has denounced Iran's nuclear program and approved sanctions against it?

Iran may or may not have the political will to move from civilian nuclear technology to acquiring the Bomb. But it does not have it now, and the International Atomic Energy Agency cannot even prove that Iran's nuclear program aims to create nuclear weapons. Even if it does, that objective is unlikely to be reached in less than six or eight years.

Pakistan is quite another matter. It is a nuclear power with an arsenal of some 40 nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles for them, including ballistic, and now also cruise, missiles.

But Pakistan, unlike Iran or North Korea, is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and therefore has not violated any international laws by building nuclear weapons. In this it followed the example of India, also a nuclear state.

It is rumored that Pakistan stole its nuclear technology. But then, many countries have stolen nuclear technology. The Soviet Union is said to have had a spy, codenamed Perseus, who breached U.S. national security at Los Alamos during the Manhattan project. That man believed that nuclear parity was necessary for the Soviet Union and the United States to live at peace with each other. This is for all those crying about Pakistan painting its flag on foreign technology...who has not done this???

Abdul Qadeer Khan, revered as Pakistan's "father of the bomb," was tried not for stealing nuclear secrets for his country, but for allegedly sharing them with Iran.

Citing the need to restore the military balance with its long-time rival, Pakistan went nuclear after India tested a bomb in 1974. In 1998, both countries held nuclear tests, but Pakistan announced its plans to modernize its nuclear and missile program only in 2005, after coordinating missile launches with India.

The nuclear parity between India and Pakistan is playing a positive role, just as it did in the case of the Soviet Union and the United States. The probability of a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan is very small because a nuclear war between two adjacent countries with comparable arsenals could well vaporize both. As a result, they have been promoting peaceful bilateral dialog since 2004 and intend to continue discussing all related issues, including nuclear safety.

When it is said that extremists or, worse still, international terrorists, may get hold of nuclear weapons, it is Pakistan that comes to mind. But this is unfair, primarily because the Pakistani military, a respected force in the county, has a proven record of preventing extremists from taking power in the country.

The Pakistani authorities say that its army will not allow Islamic radicals to interfere in the country's nuclear policy. Most importantly, Pakistani society is fully in favor of the military maintaining its comprehensive control over nuclear technologies.

But even if the country's nuclear arsenal is safe from misuse by an extremist government, there remain two more problems. First, could Pakistani nuclear weapons be stolen by extremists, or covertly sold to other countries without official approval? And second, does Pakistan have the technology to prevent the accidental activation of nuclear weapons?

Islamabad has said that it will never permit leaks from its nuclear arsenals, especially after A.Q. Khan's betrayal. So far it has honored its commitment.

As for technical problems, nuclear safety systems entail the use of cutting-edge technologies in different sectors. Traditionally, nuclear powers have always paid much attention to this, and Pakistan is most likely doing the same. However, the resources available are clearly not comparable to those of other nuclear states, and France or China could both do more in this sphere than Pakistan.

International Security - Industry - Analysis - UPI.com
 
PAKISTAN DEFENCE PRODUCTION: PROSPECTS FOR DEFENCE EXPORT

Malik Qasim Mustafa *


From Dependency to Self-reliance

During the colonial rule, sixteen ordnance factories were established in the sub-continent. After the creation of Pakistan in 1947, all those sixteen factories fell to Indian share since none of them were located in Muslim majority areas forming Pakistan.1 The newly-created Pakistan emerged with a fragile state apparatus and rudimentary Armed Forces headed by three British Chiefs for its respective forces, and scarcely had any infrastructure or equipment and no ammunition manufacturing facility, to meet the security challenges confronting its sovereignty, national security and territorial integrity. By October 1947, just two and half months after its creation, in such dire conditions the fledgling state of Pakistan already faced its first major externally-launched security threat – namely the Indian aggression against and its occupation of two-thirds of the Jammu and Kashmir State.

After independence, India provided Pakistan with only 6,000 tons of munitions out of 1700,000 tons in its possession, when it was proportionately entitled to more. The subsequent war in Kashmir pushed Pakistan’s army into a state of actual imbalance.2 On the economic front, Pakistan faced the same situation. Of its total dues Pakistan received only 147 million pounds sterling, representing 17% of the total balance held by India.3 On an immediate basis, Pakistan had to use almost 70% of that amount in arms purchases to redress this imbalance.

In 1951, the first Prime Minister of Pakistan, Liaquat Ali Khan, issued a directive to establish an ordnance factory to manufacture rifles and ammunition.4 Subsequently, in December 1951, the second Prime Minister of Pakistan, Khawaja Nazim-ud-Din, laid the foundation of four Pakistan Ordnance Factories with the cooperation of British Royal Ordnance, at Wah near Rawalpindi. This was the first step towards the establishment of a mother defence industry in Pakistan.

In its early years, lack of resources to deal with national security concerns pushed Pakistan to look for some outside help. At that time there were two power blocs, led by two super powers, the US and the Soviet Union, who dominated world affairs. Pakistan formed an alliance with the US in 1950s to meet the challenges of security, territorial integrity and to achieve a reasonable military equilibrium with India. On December 15, 1950, Pakistan signed a Mutual Defence Assistance Agreement with the US.5 The next major effort was made in 1952, when Mir Laik Ali Khan, Adviser to the Minister of Defence, visited the UK and the US and convinced the governments of both countries for arms sales to Pakistan.6 In May 1954, Pakistan signed another Mutual Defence Assistance Agreement with the US. Later in that year Pakistan also joined the SEATO and CENTO in 1955, with a US security guarantee. In 1959, Pakistan signed a bilateral Agreement of Cooperation with the US and became an ‘America’s most allied ally in Asia.’7 As a result of these agreements, Pakistan received significant military aid and training throughout 1950s and the early 1960s.8

During the period of reliance on the US supply, there was little attention given to domestic production. However, the 1965 Indo-Pak War led to a drastic reduction in economic and military assistance to Pakistan as the Pak-US cooperation which started in 1954 came to an end in 1965, and the US imposed sanctions on Pakistan. The US stopped all military aid to both India and Pakistan. Unlike India, it was a major disaster for Pakistan. This led the Pakistani leadership and policy makers to begin efforts to diversify their military hardware procurement policy.

After the 1965 War, on the one hand Pakistan was facing the US military sanctions, while on the other side India continued to build-up its armed forces with the Soviet help. The increasing pressure of Indian military build-up, forced Pakistan to turn towards China, North Korea, Germany, Italy and France for its defence procurement programmes. China, being a neighbour proved a good friend and helped Pakistan to raise three fully-equipped infantry divisions, including guns military vehicles, 900 Chinese tanks and MiG-19F aircraft for the air force. France supplied Mirage aircraft and submarines. In 1968, the Soviet Union offered US$30 million worth of aid to Pakistan and supplied 100 T-55 tanks, Mi-8 helicopters, guns and vehicles. In 1969, however, Soviet support was abruptly stopped under Indian pressure.

After the 1971 War, Pakistan continued to engage in rebuilding itself and spent huge resources on defence imports. The Heavy Industries at Taxila was established in 1971, followed by the F-6 overhaul and Rebuild Factory in 1972 at Kamra. This marked the first major step towards achieving some degree of self-reliance in the maintenance of modern aircraft and weapon systems. In 1973, the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex at Kamra, north of Islamabad, came into being. Within a year, PAF had accepted the offer of a large number of F-6s (Chinese version of Mig-19s) from its trusted ally, China.9 Furthermore, Pakistan bought 24 French Mirage and Canadian Sabres (renamed F-86Es) on cash, and PAF arranged spares for existing fleets through alternate sources. In the meantime Pakistan also began the pursuit of its nuclear programme, to which end it also established Dr. A. Q. Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) in 1976.

In 1979, the US imposed sanctions on Pakistan when it learned that Pakistan had secretly begun construction of a uranium enrichment facility. As a result, the US stopped $85 million worth of military and economic aid to Pakistan. However, after the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Pakistan became a frontline ally of the US. In 1981, the US provided $3.2 billion in military and economic assistance to Pakistan, including the sanction of the purchase of 40 F-16s. In 1986, the US provided another aid package of $4 billion to Pakistan. Through the rest of the 1980s, the US continued its economic and military assistance to Pakistan, and the latter continued to modernise its armed forces. Pakistan mainly excelled in small arms and sold to approximately thirty countries including Sri Lanka, UAE, and many Middle Eastern countries. By the end of 1980s, the export figures were raised to Rs. 400 million annually.10

Even more tellingly, the United States rewarded Pakistan’s most unflinching cooperation in the Soviet-Afghan War during the 1980s by invoking, in October 1990, the Pressler Amendment to the US Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.11 The US suspected that Pakistan was developing nuclear weapons.12 The Pressler Amendment ended the supply of economic and military aid to Pakistan, which had averaged $650 million a year in the 1980s. This Amendment widened the conventional gap between India and Pakistan. Especially, the freeze of the deal of 28 F-16s - which eventually were never supplied to Pakistan - as the US believed that F-16s would be used by Pakistan for delivery of nuclear weapons and would spark an unprecedented, destabilising arms build-up in South Asia, thus playing a significant role in further crippling Pakistan Air Force.

In September 1991, the determination to move towards a degree of self-sufficiency in armament production resulted in the creation of the Ministry of Defence Production.13 The Ministry promoted defence production facilities including Pakistan Ordnance Factory (POF), the Heavy Industries at Taxila (HIT), and Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC). The Ministry also included seven other specialised organisations devoted to research and development, production, and administration. The government estimated annual production in the early 1990s at US$500 million including about US$30 million in exports. For example, Mushshaks – light trainers and observation aircraft – were provided to Iran. Exports ranked high among the ministry's goals.14

In 1996, the US passed the Brown Amendment, which allowed nearly $370 million of previously embargoed arms and spare parts to be delivered to Pakistan.15 After the May 1998 nuclear tests, the US re-imposed sanctions under Glenn Amendment which almost banned all sorts of economic, financial and military assistance to Pakistan. However, after the 9/11 events, Pakistan once again became a frontline state in the international coalition’s ‘war on terrorism’, and as yet another outcome of that decision on Pakistan’s part, the US removed sanctions against Pakistan, which were imposed after the May 1998 nuclear tests.

Throughout its history of survival against great odds, Pakistan spent a major chunk of its defence budget on imports for its defence needs (see Appendix 1). In the recent decade, in order to meet its security requirements, Pakistan took a number of steps to develop some key areas to become self-sufficient in defence. There are over 20 major public sector units and over a 100 private sector firms engaged in the manufacture of defence-related products. Over a period of time Pakistan’s defence industry has grown into well-established units, and has developed the potential to export defence equipment to friendly states and international markets. This export potential in defence industry is not only the key to the country’s survival, but it would also bring in the much-needed foreign exchange.

Since 2000 Pakistan’s defence industry has been holding annual exhibitions under the auspices of the International Defence Exhibition and Seminar (IDEAS 2000, 2002 and 2004). The IDEAS ‘arms for peace’, as its theme, reflects Pakistan’s desire to promote peace and stability not only within the region but also elsewhere in the world.16 It recognises the fact that export of cost-effective armaments would help nations to maintain peace by equipping their armed forces, and to attain a minimum degree of deterrence against external threats at an affordable level. IDEAS provides an interactive platform for the international defence manufacturing industry to showcase their products and services and enhance cooperation between countries from all parts of the world to share the common global cause of peace (against common enemies, such as the war against terrorism).

The concept of IDEAS succeeded through its previous events and attracted the attention of numerous leading defence industry and services. The recent IDEAS 2004 exhibition held in Karachi from September 13-17, was one of the biggest defence exhibitions to be held in the region. In IDEAS 2004, more that 50 countries attended while 150 national and multinational firms participated. Pakistan Aeronautical Complex displayed the indigenously manufactured Mushshak, Super Mushshak and Karakorum-8 Jet trainer aircraft, which is a very attractive aircraft for the countries with limited defence budgets.

Through IDEAS, Pakistan’s defence exports have grown tremendously. Pakistan has already found markets in a number of Asian, African and Middle Eastern countries. Pakistan’s export target for the year 2003-04 is $147 million, which is expected to further rise to the level of at least $500 million (i.e., 1% of the $50 billion global arms market) during the next five years.17 While inaugurating IDEAS 2004, President Musharraf pointed out, ‘we came under sanctions sometimes back and apart from negative effects these had positive effects. That was to diversify our sources of weapons and indigenisation. Those sanctions also assisted us in developing our own industry towards self- reliance.’18

Major Defence Production Capabilities of Pakistan

In 1972, Defence Production Division within the Ministry of Defence was created. That was a time when the US military aid was suspended and it was felt necessary to strive for self-reliance in defence production.19 Defence Production Division is charged with the responsibility of providing the three Services with arms, ammunition and weapon systems through manufacturing or purchases. (See Figure. 1) Some of the main objectives and functions of the Ministry of Defence Production Division are:

* Achieving self reliance;

* Import substitution by indigenisation;

* Maintain existing system with minimum import requirements;

* Involve local industry in defence production;

* Production of cost-effective and competitive equipment;

* Generate funds by exporting defence products;

* Research and development of defence equipment;

* Procurement of defence equipment, and negotiations for foreign assistance or loans; and

* To attain economies of scale through optimum production and procurement.20

Pakistan relies on more than 100 public and private defence production units. Some of them are discussed below.

1. Pakistan Ordnance Factories

The Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF), founded on December 28, 1951, at Wah near Rawalpindi, are one of the premier defence industries and the lifeline of Pakistan armed forces. Mainly the POF consists of 14 major factories that take care of almost 100% requirements of Pakistan armed forces.21 POF produce approximately 70 major products for Army, Navy and Air Force. The main products include automatic rifles, machine guns, sub-machine guns, anti-aircraft guns, complete range of mortar and artillery ammunitions, aircraft and anti aircraft ammunitions, tank and anti-tank ammunitions, bombs, grenades, anti-tank mines, pyrotechnics, commercial explosives and commercial products, and rockets and so forth.22 These factories are also ISO-900123 and ISO-14001 certified. They employ some of the latest state of the art technologies, including computerised numerical-controlled machines and flexible manufacturing systems for production of precision components.24 This modern industrial complex has also assisted many sister defence production setups to flourish. The major factories and subsidiaries of the POF are the following:

* Factories

* Weapons Factory

* Bombs & Grenades Factory

* Tungsten Carbide Factory

* Machine Gun Factory

* Filling Factory

* Propellants Factory

* Heavy Artillery Ammo Factory

* Small Arms Ammo Factory

* Brass Mills

* Tungsten Alloy Factory

* Tank Amrno Factory

* Explosives Factory

* Medium Artillery Ammo Factory

* Clothing factory

* Subsidiaries 25

* Wah industries Ltd.

* Wah Nobel (Pvt) Ltd.

* Wah Nobel Chemicals Ltd.

* Wah Nobel Detonators Ltd.

* Wah Nobel Acetate Ltd.

* Attock Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd.

* Hi-Tech Plastics (Pvt) Ltd.

In the first 15 to 20 years after their establishment, the POF were confined mostly to the manufacture of traditional products, but following the different phases of expansion, diversification and consolidation, POF has come of age by taking a quantum jump to the modern state-of-the-art manufacturing technology of international standards.26 Modern live-firing test facilities are available to ensure international acceptance standards of the products.27 In view of the tight foreign exchange situation and sanctions imposed by developed countries, the POF management has undertaken indigenisation programmes aimed at achieving self-sufficiency in raw materials, semi-finished goods and other products. In the process, POF has saved millions in foreign exchange. POF has been at one time or the other exporting arms and ammunition to 30 countries around the globe. The buyers include not only those from the developing countries but also in Europe and the USA. During the last three years, POF recorded high exports of arms and ammo and was awarded the FPCCI trophy for exports.28

2. Heavy Industries Taxila

Heavy Industries Taxila (HIT) is a dynamic and progressive organisation where cooperation and cohesion between various sectors has been harnessed to maximise results. The birth of HIT took place in 1971 when Project-711 was established in Taxila with Chinese assistance mainly to rebuild the T-59 Tank fleet of the Pakistan Army.30 HIT has built the MBT 2000 Al-Khalid30, APC M-113, IFV Al-Zarar, (an upgraded version of the T-59 tanks of Chinese origin), T-59 MII, T-69 IIMP, T-85 IIAP, and fighting vehicles for the Pakistan Army.31 The HIT has also built Armoured Personal Carriers (APCs) M113 A1/A2, M113 A2 MK-1 and ARV-W653.32 HIT consists of:

a. Heavy Rebuild Factory T-Series and Heavy Rebuild Factory M-Series (rebuild facilities), APC Factory, Tank Factory and Gun Factory (manufacturing facilities), for a cost effective and progressive manufacture of armoured fighting vehicles, armoured personnel carriers (APCs), and tank guns.33

b. Development Engineering Support Components Manufacture (DESCOM) for development of materials and components required.

c. Training and Research Organisation (ETRO).

The progress made by HIT in the development of Al-Khalid tank has been very encouraging.34 This is a true reflection of the dedication of its planners, engineers and technicians. The Al-Khalid has been developed in association with China North Industries Corporation (NORINCO).35 The pilot production of Al-Khalid tank started in November 2000. In May 2002, Pakistan signed a contract with the Ukrainian Malyshev tank plant for the supply of 6TD-2 engines to be used in the production of Al-Khalid tanks.36

Presently, more than 7500 components of differing types are manufactured locally by HIT while another 7500 components of various categories are being produced by numerous vendors associated with HIT.37 On February 26, 2004, President General Pervez Musharraf, handed over 80 indigenously modernised and upgraded Al-Zarrar tanks to the Pakistan Army and 25 APCs to the police, which is an evidence of cost effective, self-sufficient defence production.38 HIT has become a very important industrial base and is playing a definite and a potent role in national self-reliance.

3. Heavy Mechanical Complex

Heavy Mechanical Complex Ltd. (HMC), Taxila, established in 1979 with Chinese assistance, is a major heavy engineering subsidiary of the State Engineering Corporation (SEC) under the Ministry of Industries & Production, Government of Pakistan. The Heavy Forge Factory (HFF) at this complex has proved crucial for Pakistan's defence production needs. HMC has the capability for designing, engineering and manufacturing of industrial plants and machinery. HMC has the largest fabrication and machining facilities in the country equipped with Computer-Aided Designing (CAD) and can undertake a variety of fabrication/machining jobs on sub-contracting basis. HMC manufactures equipment for hydro-electric power plants, thermal power plants, sulphuric acid plants, industrial alcohol plants, oil & gas processing plants, and chemical & petro-chemical plants, etc. Boilers, cranes, construction machinery, material handling equipment, steel structure, railway equipment, etc. are some of the other products that are produced on regular basis.39

4. Pakistan Aeronautical Complex

Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC), Kamra, has expanded its scope, and commenced new and more challenging projects, created a veritable centre of excellence in military aviation and information technology, and above all, realised the original goal of self-reliance. PAC is composed of four factories:

I. F-6 Rebuild Factory (F-6 RF)

F-6 RF started its work in 1972, primarily for overhauling the Shenyang F-6s and their accessories. In 1980, F-6 RF expanded its role by undertaking the overhaul of F-6, FT-6, A-5III, FT-5 and F-7P aircraft along with its components and accessories. In February 1997, F-6 RF was certified under the ISO 9002 Quality Management System. Presently, F-6 RF possesses modern technical facilities for various engineering processes such as guns overhauling, surface treatment, heat treatment, etc.

II. Mirage Rebuild Factory (MRF)

MRF started its operation in 1978 by overhauling Mirage III and V fighter aircrafts and ATAR C90 engines and related accessories. MRF is so much advanced that it also overhauled eight UAE Air Force Mirages and 42 Dassault/Commonwealth Mirage IIIOAs and eight IIIDs, bought from Australia in 1991.40 MRF can also overhaul F-100 engines powering the F-16s.41 On September 14, 1995, MRF also had the distinction of being the first defence establishment in Pakistan to achieve ISO-9002 certified.

III. Aircraft Manufacturing Factory (AMF)

AMF was established in 1975 to assemble Mushshak. Since 1982 Mushshak aircraft not only delivered to Pakistan defence forces but also sold to other countries. AMF has been marketing its new improved Super Mashshak.42 AMF achieved another big milestone by the joint production of Karakorum-8 Jet Fighter Trainer with China which is capable of providing basic and advance training. It is a highly reliable aerobatic aircraft with excellent characteristics. PAC Complex is also manufacturing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) such as Vector, the Hornet, Nishan, Ababeel and Baz.43 Pakistan recently exported Mushshak trainer aircraft to many Muslim countries and handed over 20 Super Mushshak to Saudi Arabia in September 2004. AMF is undoubtedly one facility that could help in achieving self-reliance and earning foreign exchange.

IV. Kamra Avionics and Radar Factory (KARF)

KARF started its work in 1987 by rebuilding Siemens MPDR-45E radars, complex components and electronics modules, and caterpillar/Siemens power generators.44 KARF is also involved in co-production of airborne radar for fighters and upgrading of Mirage III avionics suite. It is also producing the Grifo-7 radar which is a coherent digital fire control system designed to improve air to air and air to ground performances of F-7P aircraft.

5. Air Weapons Complex

The Air Weapon Complex (AWC) started its operation in 1992 and it is located in Wah/Kamra. The AWC is one of the leading organisations in Pakistan in the field of Air Delivered Weapons/Systems.45 Formation of the AWC has significantly reduced the dependence of Pakistan on foreign resources. The AWC mainly produces,

a. Battlefield Interdiction and Tactical Support Weapons46

b. Airfield Attack and Denial Munitions

c. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) 47

d. Electronic Warfare Systems

e. Infantry Support Equipment

f. Air Defence System

g. Training Aid Systems

6. Military Vehicles Research and Development Establishment

Military Vehicles Research and Development Establishment’s (MVRDE) was created in 1972. Since than MVRDE is fully involved in mobilising, orientating and developing public and private industrial sector to achieve progressive self-reliance in defence equipment.48 Its infrastructure encompasses a wide spectrum of facilities under following broad categories:

a. R & D Sections

b. Armoured Vehicles - Tanks, APCs, ARVs

c. Wheeled Vehicles

d. Engineers Equipment

MVRDE is determined to play an important role in keeping the costs of military equipment down to a reasonable level and share benefits of its expertise and experience with friendly countries.

7. Armament Research and Development Establishment

Since its inception in 1974, the Armament Research and Development Establishment (ARDE) has been undertaking research and development in the field of arms and ammunitions. Major accomplishments of ARDE are production of weapons and tank ammunition.49 This ammunition includes:

a. 120 mm mortar

b. RPG-7 rocket launcher

c. Mines

d. 100 mm DS/T Practice

e. 100 mm APFSDS/T

f. 105 mm DS/T Practice

g. 125 mm FSDS/T

h. 125 mm APFSDS/T

8. Institute of Optronics

Institute of Optronics (IOP) produces state-of-the-art military, night-vision devices, which improve the ability of the Armed Forces to undertake different tasks.50 The IOP is producing following military specific night-vision devices:

a. Individual Served Night Vision Weapon Sight

b. Crew Served Night Vision Weapon Sight

c. High Performance Night Vision Goggles

d. High Performance Night Vision Binoculars

e. Driver’s Night Vision Periscope

f. Aviator’s Night Vision Goggle

One of the future agenda of IOP is Thermal Imaging Techniques for all types of armoured vehicles and helicopters. Besides meeting the night-vision requirements of the Armed Forces of Pakistan, this institute has exported these devices to friendly countries.

9. Margalla Electronics

Margalla Electronics (ME) was created in 1984 as a self-reliance project to support the Defence Services in the field of electronics. The support includes:

a. Repair and rebuild of electronic equipment used by the services

b. Applied research to improve equipment performance and reliability

c. Original design and production

Within a short span of time the ME has accumulated sophisticated skills and hardware necessary for assembling, testing, and repairing of various types of military electronics products. ME has co-produced and fielded sophisticated state-of-the-art radar systems and communications equipment jointly with various international companies.51

10. Submarine Rebuild Complex

The Submarine Rebuild Complex (SRC) is dedicated towards rebuild and progressive manufacture of Submarines.52

11. Defence Science and Technology Organisation

The Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DESTO) is the premier defence research and development organisation of Pakistan. DESTO conducts research and development around weapons and weapon systems and renders professional advice on the application of science and technology. DESTO covers broad disciplines of aerodynamics, propulsion, defence electronics, computer systems, engineering, propellants, explosives, materials and chemical & biological defence etc.53 DESTO’s R&D infrastructure is located at the following different physical locations:

a. DESTO Laboratories Complex, Chattar

b. DESTO Laboratories, Karachi

c. DESTO Laboratories, Chaklala

After Pakistan conducted nuclear tests in May 1998, the US government identified and sanctioned DESTO as partner organisation in Pakistan's nuclear and missile programmes.54

12. Karachi Shipyard and Engineering Works

The Karachi Shipyard and Engineering Work Ltd., (KSEW) is ISO-9002 certified for shipbuilding, submarine and warship construction and general engineering works.55 The present production capabilities are:

a. Shipbuilding of all types of vessels and craft of up to 26,000 TDW.

b. Small submarines and warship/support craft like Missile Craft, Patrol Craft, Diving Boats, Towed Array Barge, Floating Docks, Berthing/Pusher Tugs, Oil/Water carriers, boats etc.

c. Wide variety of engineering plants and machinery like pressure vessels, LPG storage tanks, etc.56

Exportable products are:

* Submarine - Agosta 90B

* Midget Submarine

* Missile Craft

* Floating Dock

* Tugs

13. Integrated Defence Systems (National Development Complex

The National Development Complex (NDC) was created in 1993 with the objective of developing an infrastructure for indigenous weapons development to achieve self-reliance in diverse technologies. In 1995 the Shaheen missile programme was initiated by the NDC along with the facilities of different industries in Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, Gujranwala, Sialkot, Gujrat and other cities.57 Since its creation, NDC has made remarkable progress in developing and producing a diverse range of defence products, including:

* Missile Systems

* Launchers

* Area Denial Bomb PSD-1

* Fuel-Air Explosive Bomb FAE-1

* Warheads For Anti-Armour & Tactical Applications

* Energetic Materials & Propellants

* Military Fuses

* Power Sources

* Defence-Electronics

Towards attaining self-reliance, NDC has also undertaken the development of Launchers, along with the development of automatic missile testing and launch control system (ATLCS).58

14. Pakistan Navy Dockyard

The Pakistan Navy (PN) Dockyard, since its inception in 1952, has been undertaking repair works, modernisation and rebuild of Pakistan Navy Ships, Submarines and Crafts. Pakistan Navy Dockyard is providing technical assistance, rebuild and repair of a wide range and diversity of equipment of PN Fleet and has undertaken fleet modernisation and up gradation programmes with success. PN Dockyard has developed the capability to undertake ambitious and indigenous construction projects like the production of Missiles Boats, Mines Counter Measure Vessel (MCMV) and AGOSTA 90-B Submarine.59

15. Dr A Q Khan Research Laboratories

Dr. A.Q. Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) is one of the main nuclear laboratory, as well as a long-range missile development centre. The primary Pakistani fissile-material production facility is located at Kahuta, employing gas centrifuge enrichment technology to produce Highly-Enriched Uranium (HEU). This facility is not under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards, but according to the Government of Pakistan the facility is physically secure and safe. Initially the KRL was known as Engineering Research Laboratories (ERL), founded by Dr. A. Q. Khan on July 31, 1976, with the exclusive task of indigenous development of Uranium Enrichment Plant. Within the next five years the target was achieved. On May 1, 1981, ERL was renamed as Dr. A.Q. Khan Research Laboratories (KRL). It was the enrichment of Uranium in KRL that ultimately led to the successful detonation of Pakistan's first nuclear device on May 28, 1998.60

The Kahuta facility has also been a participant in Pakistan's missile development programme. KRL has successfully developed and tested Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles based on liquid fuel technology and its associated sub-systems. KRL has also undertaken many other defence projects of national importance to enable Pakistan to become self-reliant and thus help save valuable foreign exchange. These projects include:

* Surface-to-Air-Anti-Aircraft Guided Missiles - Anza Mk 1, and Anza Mk-II.

* Baktar Shikan Anti-Tank Guided Missile Weapon System.

* Anti-personnel Mine Sweeping Line Charges.

* Anti-Tank Mine Clearing Line Charge-Plofadder-195 AT.

* Laser Range Finder.

* Laser Threat Sensor.

* Laser Actuated Target.

* Laser-Aiming Device.

* Add-On Reactive Armour Kit.

* Anti-Tank Ammunition.

* Remote Control Mine Exploder (RCME).

* Digital Goniometer.

* Power Conditioners for Weapon Systems.

* Tow Missile Modules.

Major defence production establishment/organisations/ industries of Pakistan are covering a wide range of activities from research and development, to assembly and the manufacture of modern and state-of-art defence equipment. Pakistani defence products have always earned a proud reputation of reliability, cost effectiveness, and above all the capabilities to match modern-day defence equipment.

Defence Exports

Pakistan’s defence industry is not only meeting the requirements of its Armed Forces of Pakistan, but also exporting defence products to other friendly countries. Such export is not only contributing to economic growth, but also trying to maintain a balance between defence spending and national development. In 2000, the Defence Export Promotion Organisation (DEPO) was established to promote the export of surplus defence products.61 DEPO is not only promoting defence products but also coordinating export activities covering all defence-related equipment. To apprise buyers, a permanent Defence Products Exhibition Centre has been established at Rawalpindi to display the items available for export. DEPO has also arranged defence exhibitions like IDEAS 2000, 2002 and 2004, as President General Pervez Musharraf stressed that defence exhibitions ‘not only provide a window for defence products but also a platform for professional interaction between foreign delegations, senior government and military officials.’62

Pakistan’s defence exports have already achieved three-digit figures. Pakistan has exported a number of products to other countries these includes Saudi Arabia, Iran, UEA, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. In 2001, Pakistan also exported several weapons systems to Malaysia, namely the Baktar Shikan anti-tank guided weapon, Anza MKII shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missile, RPG-7 rocket-propelled grenade and several types of conventional ammunition.63 In the years 2000 and 2001, Pakistan's export earnings from weapons and defence equipment made a quantum jump of almost 100%, from $40 million to $85-$90 million in 2002.64 PAC also signed a contract worth $2.27 millions for overhauling six aircrafts of the Sri Lanka Air Force.

In April 2002, Malaysia ordered 25,700 anti-tank (heat) rockets from Pakistan.65 During April 8-11, 2002, at DSA-2002 international exhibition of armament, Malaysian military and government officials considered the Al-Khalid tank as the best, and showed their interest in buying it from Pakistan.66 In August 2002, Pakistan completed its first military aircraft export order by delivering five Super Mushshak Trainer Aircraft to Oman.67 Brigadier Saeed Bin Hamood of Royal Oman Air Force, said that ‘relations between two air forces would be stronger, and we would like to see more in cooperation with support of these light trainer aircraft.’68 This was a major breakthrough achieved in the lucrative Middle East market, presently dominated by the defence equipment producers of the Western countries. It is expected to boost the sale of ‘Super Mushshak’ in the region. During the ‘IDEAS-2002’ held at Karachi, many countries of the Middle East, South Asia and Africa evinced a keen interest in Pakistani defence products, and some of them placed orders.

During the year 2002, KSEW also received noteworthy export orders including construction of various marine crafts for Hansa Lines of West Germany, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Bangladesh and a Belgian company.69 In 2002, POF launched a $4 billion comprehensive plan to upgrade defence production capabilities. POF is also trying to acquire the certification from the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), as it would have salutary effect on the further future marketing of Pakistani weapons and ammunitions abroad.

In 2003, after the success of IDEAS 2002, Pakistan started the process of establishing commercially viable joint ventures with foreign private investors from Islamic countries in the fields of military hardware, military training and education. There are lot of opportunities in areas such as conventional weapons, light arms, ammunition, army vehicles, field guns and anti-aircraft guns. A number of foreign companies such as Nobel of Sweden and Al-Misehal from Saudi Arabia were already operating in defence-related manufacturing in Pakistan in cooperation with the POF.70

In 2003, Pakistani defence exports crossed over $130 million, however, the aim is of gradual increase within next eight years with a target of over $1 billion.71 Over the year almost more then 200 items including missiles and tanks and the accessories related to them and other arms were exported to more than 21 targeted countries including Indonesia, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Thailand, Morocco, Libya, Mauritius and other countries of Africa.72

On June 2003, as a result of these efforts, the UAE Air Force Chief, Brigadier General Staff Pilot Abdullah Al-Sayed Mohammed A1-Hashmi, met with Pakistan’s Acting Vice Chief of the Air Staff, Air Marshal Tanvir Mahmood Ahmed, and focused on mutual cooperation between the two air forces.73 The UAE showed interest in buying Pakistani military hardware including Al-Khalid main battle tank, Mushshak trainers and various other defence items that Pakistan can offer. In June 2003, Pakistan also decided to export Al-Khalid tanks to Bangladesh and to upgrade military-to-military relations with Bangladesh.74

Recently in October 2004, Pakistan explored the possibilities of joint ventures with Saudi Arabia in arms production including missiles and tanks. Saudi Assistant Minister of Defence, Prince Khalid bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, talked with Pakistani Defence Minister, Rao Sikandar Iqbal, and underscored the need of enhancing military cooperation between the two brotherly countries.75 Enhanced arms and ammunitions for the defence services, and upgradation of certain types of ammunitions have reduced the nation’s dependence on foreign sources. Substantial foreign exchange has been earned through the sale of these products to friendly countries.76 HIT also successfully developed Al-Zarar tank by modernising the existing fleet of ‘T-59’ tanks, and attracted wide attention and recognition of Pakistan’s capability in this field.77

Prospects for Defence Export

Pakistan’s defence production has started to mature, and Pakistan plans to double its defence exports in the near future. Pakistan’s Defence industry has the capacity to manufacture surplus products in order to earn foreign exchange for national development. Pakistan is mainly focusing on main Battle Tanks, the Al-Khalid and Al-Zarrar, APC Al-Saad, Al-Muhafiz security vehicle, the Baktar Shikan Anti-Tank Guided Missile, Super Mushshak, K-8 trainer aircraft, missile boats, small arms and a wide range of artillery, tank and small arms ammunitions.78 According to Zahid Anis, Pakistan’s Secretary for Defence Production ‘today there are things that we can offer that can really interest the whole world.’79 Being a new entrant in the market, with a 95% share of public sector, Pakistan is currently sustaining $100 million worth of defence exports.80 The defence exports could increase dramatically by exporting Al-Khalid, along with JF-17 fighter, developing with China, which could be ready for export by 2008-2009. By selling these big items, Pakistan can achieve a $1 billion target over five or six years. Although it would be just a small portion of international arms market, but Pakistan could achieve parity with its imports expenditures.

Pakistan’s defence products may not be hi-tech, but are more cost-effective and affordable. Many countries have shown interest in the indigenous production of vessels by the Pakistan Navy. Any deal in this regard would not only boost Pakistan's image and credibility in the international market but would also help in earning sizeable foreign exchange. Experts from different countries have also showed interest in POF and HIT equipment, especially the Al-Khalid tank. Experts said that Al-Khalid includes qualities of some of the best tanks in the world, like targeting the enemy at night and auto-tracking of enemy tanks. Pakistani experts compare its qualities with that of Russian T-90 and German Leopard, which are considered to be the leading tanks in the world. Experts believe that Al-Khalid is the culmination of all the tank upgrading and rebuilding projects so far undertaken by the HIT.81

Marketing and sale of defence products is a time-consuming job. It normally takes 3 to 4 years to finalise and deliver a defence-related deal. In Pakistan’s case, the sale is government-to-government which usually takes more time in terms of evaluating and finalising the deal. Thus a product like a tank would take 5 to 7 years from deal to delivery. So, for that matter supplier-customer relations are the key to success. Although Pakistan is using the concept of IDEAS for the promotion of its defence products but still there is need to identify the target countries and advertise the product in such a way that it helps the buyer country to evaluate it quickly. For that purpose, timely information of the requirements of target countries is vital to boost defence exports.82 However, to capture a big market there is a need for

* Restructuring of the defence industry.

* Openings for the foreign investment.

* Joint ventures with friendly states for specific projects.

* Encouraging private sector to be involved in defence manufacturing and export.

* Adopt modern marketing tools.

Pakistan’s defence production capacity can be enhanced by launching joint ventures with friendly countries, and by enhancing defence exports Pakistan can achieve a desirable goal for earning foreign exchange. This would not only help to meet the demands of its armed forces but it would also help to stabilise its economy by spending less on defence imports. By addressing some key problems of marketing, Pakistan can become a major international player in exporting defence products ranging from small weapons to aircrafts and tanks.



Source: Ayesha Siddiqa-Agha, ‘Pakistan’s Military Procurement and Military Build-up, 1979-99: In Search of a Policy’, Palgrave, New York: 2001, p. 44..



References

*.
Malik Qasim Mustafa is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad.

‘Defence Export Promotion Organisation: DEPO’, DEPO, ::: DEPO - Defence Export Promotion Organization :::

Ahmad Faruqui, ‘Rethinking the National Security: The Price of Strategic Myopia’, Ashgate Publishing Limited, England, 2003, p. 41.

Ibid.

‘Defence Export Promotion Organisation: DEPO’, op. cit.

Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema, ‘Pakistan’s Defence Policy: 1947-58’, Sung-e-Meel Publication, Lahore, 1998, p. 119.

Ibid.

Ahmad Faruqui, ‘Rethinking the National Security: The Price of Strategic Myopia’, op. cit., p. 42.

The deliveries included 400 M-47/48 Patton Main Battle Tank (MBT), 200 M-4 light Sherman tanks, 300 M-113s Armed Personnel Carriers (APCs), 12 F-140 supersonic interceptors, 120 F-86F fighter bombers, 26 B-57B light bombers, and T-33 jet trainers. These weapons were used to equip five and half divisions of the Pakistan army. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, The Arms Trade Register, MIT Press, 1975.

Air Cdre (Retd) Jamal Hussain, ‘The Struggle for Self-Reliance in the PAF’, Defence Journal, September 2001, PakSearch.com - Pakistan's Best Business site with Annual Reports, Laws and Articles dj/2001/September01/struggle.html

Ayesha Siddiqa-Agha, ‘Pakistan’s Military Procurement and Military Build-up, 1979-99: In Search of a Policy’, Palgrave, New York, 2001, p. 110.

Ahmad Faruqui, ‘Rethinking the National Security: The Price of Strategic Myopia’, op. cit., p. XXV.

‘Pakistan Nuclear Weapons: A Chronology’, Federation of American Scientists, Pakistan Special Weapons - A Chronology

‘Ministry of Defence Production’, Pakistan Special Weapons agency/mdp.htm

‘Ddefence Industry and Infrastructure’, Ironsides - Site Head Quarters army/pk.html#defind

‘Pakistan Nuclear Weapons: A Chronology’, Federation of American Scientists, Pakistan Special Weapons - A Chronology

‘Arms for Peace’ is theme of the IDEAS, IDEAS 2000, http://www.ideaspakistan.com/2000/index1.htm

‘IDEAS 2004’, September 14-17, 2004, ..:: IDEAS PAKISTAN 2008 International Defence Exhibition & Seminar - Arms for Peace, 24 -28 November 2008 at Karachi Expo Centre ::.. pakistan.htm

The Nations, October 1, 2004, http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/oct-2004/1/columns2.php

‘Overview: Ministry of Defence’, www.pakistan.gov.pk/defence-ministry/aboutministry/overview.jsp

‘Overview: Defence Production Division’, Pakistan.Gov.Pk - The Official Web Gateway to the Government of Pakistan defenceproduction-division/aboutus/overview.jsp

‘Golden Jubilee of Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF) Wah’, December 28, 2001, Golden Jubilee of Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF) Wah

‘Pakistan Ordnance Factories’, Pakistan Special Weapons facility/wah.htm,

In 1999, M/s Moody International of UK awarded the ISO 9001 certificate to the entire 14 major industries and 6 departments of the POF. POF produces arms & ammo of German US, British and Chinese origin strictly to International standards of acceptance.

‘Pakistan Ordnance Factories - Military Production Facility’, for further details see the official web site of POF, www.pofwah.com.pk

The two main subsidiaries namely Wah Industries Ltd. and Wah Nobel Ltd. were established to utilise spare capacities of factories for commercial applications, but later on Hi-Tech Plastics Ltd, Wah Nobel Chemical Ltd, Wah Nobel Detonators Ltd. and Attock Chemicals Ltd were set up to meet the requirements of the civilian market. These subsidiaries are earning significant profits annually thus adding to the national wealth. For more details visit, Wah Nobel Group of Companies

‘Golden Jubilee of Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF) Wah’, op. cit.

‘Pakistan Ordnance Factories - Military Production Facility’, op. cit.

Ibid.

Ikram Sehgal, ‘Towards Self-reliance: A Tank Factory for All Seasons’, Defence Journal, July 1998, www.defencejournal.com/july98/ tankfactory.htm

The Al Khalid is armed with a 125mm smoothbore gun, a 7.62mm co-axial machine gun and 12.7mm machine gun on the roof. The Al-Khalid is one of the newest and most deadly tanks in the world. It meets severe desert conditions, with high performance. It represents the ideal integration of firepower, mobility and protection.

‘Taxila: Heavy Industries Taxila- HIT’, Pakistan Special Weapons facility/taxila.htm

‘Heavy Industries Taxila’, DEPO, www.depo.org.pk/products/hit/ index.htm#RESEARCH

‘Mission: Heavy Industries Taxila’, DEPO, www.depo.org.pk/products/ hit/index.htm

The development of a tank is a complex and time-consuming task. Countries like the USA, France and UK, which are advanced tank-producing nations, took more than a decade to field their tanks Abrams MI, Leclerc and Challenger respectively. India took more than 23 years to take a decision to equip only two regiments with Arjun tanks but prototypes have not been successful.

Christopher F. Foss, ‘Al Khalid MBT to enter production’, Janes Defence Weekly, November 22, 2000, Jane's Information Group regional_news/asia_pacific/ news/jdw/jdw001122_1_n.shtml

‘Pakistan's, $150 Million Contract Signed With Ukraine’, Pakistani Defence, www.********************/news/MonthlyNewsArchive/ 2002/ April2002.htm

Ikram Sehgal, ‘Towards Self-reliance: A Tank Factory for All Seasons’, op. cit.

‘80 Al-Zarrar tanks handed over to army’, Dawn, February 27, 2004, www.dawn.com

‘Taxila: Heavy Industries Taxila- HIT’, op. cit.

‘PAC - Pakistan Aeronautical Complex’, www.pakdef.info/ pakmilitary/ airforce/index.html

‘Mirage Rebuild Factory’, DEPO, www.depo.org.pk/products/ pac/mirage.htm

Super Mushshak has a number of advantages over its predecessor, but the main selling point is the improved six cylinder Lycoming engine, which allows the Super Mushshak to reach a cruise speed of 130 Knots and 1700 ft/min rate of climb.

For further details of Ababeel, Baz, Nishan, ect. see, ::: DEPO - Defence Export Promotion Organization ::: products/pac/kamra.htm

‘Kamra Avionics and Radar Factory: Pakistan Aeronautical Complex’, DEPO, http://www.depo.org.pk/products/pac/kamra.htm

For further details see, ‘Air Weapon Complex’, Air Weapons Complex, Pakistan

The AWC product range includes: HAFR-1: Anti Runway Weapon; IRST: Infra Red Search and Track System; 250 kg Pre-fragmented Bomb; 250 kg MK-82 Steel Bomb; 500 kg MK-83 Steel Bomb; 1000 kg MK-84 Steel Bomb; Air Burst Electronic Fuses (Impact and Detonating); Low/High Drag Tail Units; 25 lbs and 6 kg Practice Bombs; GPS: Global Positioning System; and the Mushshak Trainer Aircraft ‘Products: Air Weapons Complex Pakistan’, Air Weapons Complex, Pakistan

The AWC embarked on a project for the indigenous development of UAV's in the middle of 1998. The Sky Tracker and Sky Navigator suite of software were developed for the ground-based tracking of remotely piloted vehicles (RPV's)/unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV's). The software gets the UAV's GPS positional data from a radio data link. This data is used to show the position of the UAV as a 2D plot along with essential UAV data like, speed, altitude, heading etc. This plot can be overlaid onto area maps also. This information is used by the pilot for flying the UAV beyond visual range. ‘Kamra: Air Weapon Complex - AWC’, Nuclear Forces Guide pakistan/facility/karma.htm

‘Military Vehicles Research & Development Establishment (MVRDE)’, DEPO, ::: DEPO - Defence Export Promotion Organization :::

‘Armament Research & Development Establishment (ARDE)’, www.depo.org.pk/products/arde/index.htm

Command and control, surveillance, movements both tactical and logistical and accuracy of firepower are some of the areas of activities in which the Night Vision Devices are playing a formidable and vital role ‘Institute of Optronics’, DEPO, www.depo.org.pk/products/iop/index.htm

‘Margalla Electronics’, DEPO, http://www.depo.org.pk/products/me/index.htm

‘Submarine Rebuild Complex (SRC)’, www.pakistan.gov.pk/defenceproduction-division/highlight-services.jsp

‘Defence Science & Technology Organisation (DESTO)’ www.pakistan.gov.pk/defenceproduction-division/highlight-services.jsp

‘Defence Science & Technology Organisation (DESTO)’, Defence Export Promotion Organisation (DEPO), www.depo.org.pk/products/desto/index.htm

For further details, visit Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works

‘Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works’, DEPO, www.depo.org.pk/products/ksew/index.htm

Khalid Hanif, ‘How Shaheen Was Developed’, Jang, April 19, 1999.

The ATLCS is used to automatically carry out the pre-launch testing procedures and the sequence of launching operations. In contrast to fixed launch sites, launchers provide the flexibility of launching missiles from remote places and at locations closer to the geographic boundaries.

‘PN Dockyard’, DEPO, www.depo.org.pk/products/pndk/index.htm

‘Kahuta: Khan Research Laboratories’, Kahuta - Pakistan Special Weapons Facilities

For further details see, ::: DEPO - Defence Export Promotion Organization :::

‘Gen. Musharraf Asks Private Sector To Produce Arms For Export’, Pakistani Defence, July 2002, S Asian Defence News July2002

Malaysia-Pakistan Defence Cooperation Set To Grow: Defence Secretary’, Pakistani Defence, January 2003, South Asian Defence News January 2003

‘Pakistani Arms Exports Increased By 100%’, Pakistani Defence, April 2002, www.********************/news/MonthlyNewsArchive/2002/ April2002.htm

‘Malaysian Army to take Delivery of Pakistani Anti-Tank Rockets’, Xinhua News Agency, April 10, 2002, лªÍø_´«²¥Öйú ±¨µÀÊÀ½ç

‘Malaysia Looking Into Buying Al-Khalid Tanks’, Pakistani Defence, May 2002, S Asian Defence News May2002

‘Pakistan Exports Fighter-trainer Planes’, BBC, August 2, 2002, BBC NEWS | Business | Pakistan exports fighter-trainer planes

Ibid.

KSEW To Build Two Missile Craft For Pakistan Navy’, Pakistani Defence, October 2002, www.********************/news/ MonthlyNewsArchive/2002/October2002.htm

Pakistan Ready For Joint Ventures in Defence Industry: Gen. Qayyum’, Pakistani Defence, January 2003, South Asian Defence News January 2003

‘Defence Exports to Hit $130 Million this Year: DEPO’, Pakistani Defence, June 2003, South Asian Defence News June 2003

Ibid.

‘Meeting Between Pakistani & UAE Air Chiefs Conclude’, Pakistani Defence, June 4, 2003, South Asian Defence News June 2003

‘Bangladesh and Pakistani Agree on Stronger Defence Ties’, Pakistani Defence, June 2003 www.********************/news/MonthlyNewsArchive/2003June2003.htm

‘Pakistan, Saudi Arabia Explore Joint Ventures in Defence Production’, Space Daily, October 11, 2004, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia Explore Joint Ventures In Defence Production

‘Pakistan Ordnance Factories Launches Rs. 4 Billion Upgrade Plan’, Pakistani Defence, December 2002 S Asian Defence News December 2002

Ibid.

Interview, Major Gen. Ali Hamid, Director General Defence Export Promotion Organisation (DEPO), Defence Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, September 2004.

‘Pakistan Defence Products have started to Mature’, India Info, September 29, 2004, news.indiainfo.com/2004/09/29/2909pak.html

‘Pakistan’s defence exports touch $100m’, Pakistani Defence , September 16, 2004, www.********************/news/FullNews/2004/September 2004/DefExports100mil.htm

‘Pakistan's, $150 Million Contract Signed with Ukraine’, Pakistani Defence, April 2002, S Asian Defence News April2002

Interview, Major Gen. Director General Defence Export Promotion Organisation, op. cit.

PAKISTAN DEFENCE PRODUCTION: PROSPECTS FOR DEFENCE EXPORT
 
JWDI briefing: Pakistan's defence industry
07 January 2008

Although there is no civilian involvement in its state-run defence production process at all - which has led to an extremely secretive, unorthodox and unobjective structure - it is clear that Pakistan's defence industries have benefited from a high level of government investment over a number of years. In 2007, the country's official defence budget increased by 9.13 per cent to USD4.54 billion, indicating a return to the large spending increases during 2001 to 2005. In addition to these finances, Pakistan receives substantial US aid as a key ally of the US in its 'war on terror'.

As the government has sought to maximise national self-reliance over the past decade, considerable amounts of money have been received by the defence industries, which has led to the manufacturing of products that are generally of a high standard (some of which have ISO-9002 certification, which is not granted lightly and is regionally unknown). Many products are cheaper than similar items produced by Western countries, and of comparable reliability, which has had a positive effect on exports, which now stand at about USD200 million a year.

The Pakistan government needs to do more, though, to encourage private industries to enter into defence. At present the system to enter into the defence production system is bureaucratic and excessively concerned with security, and this has dissuaded many companies from becoming involved.

Unlike most countries, there is no structured approach to capital acquisition and programme management and budgeting - as is recognised on most other countries - is not practised. Moreover, defence spending transparency is virtually non-existent apart from the overall annual budget: the government provides no specifics. Widely accepted analysis indicates that the budget does not include military pensions, which account for about PKR30-40 billion, foreign military aid, procurement using foreign credit and procurement using funds generated by the Pakistani armed forces' diverse business interests.

In 2007 the official defence budget increased by 9.13 per cent to USD4.54 billion. This rise represented a return to large spending increases between 2001 to 2005 when spending increases averaged about USD420 million or 13.54 per cent each year. The large increases were interrupted in 2006 when, despite an increase of 20 per cent in total government spending in the 2006/07 state budget and real economic growth of 6 per cent, defence spending as measured by the official budget increased by just under 3.8 per cent. Jane's Defence Budgets predicts that defence spending in Pakistan will rise to USD6.14 billion in 2010, with, on average, 10 per cent annual increases from 2007.



Image: Pakistan Aeronautical Complex's MFI-17 Super Mushshak (Jane's/Patrick Allen)

© 2008 Jane's Information Group

JWDI briefing: Pakistan's defence industry - Jane's Defence Business News
 
I just had to comment on this, because for the longest time, given the close cooperation between Pakistan and China, the external similarities between the two nation's missiles continuously gave rise to accusations from Indians about "Pakistan building Chinese clones". Just the wheel coming full circle, with us pointing out the collaborative efforts of India with various countries and similarities between products.

Oh please. Our collaboration is openly declared and when foreign assistance is sought it is openly acknowledged. Our recent successes include the Akash, Nag, Pinaka, Rajendra radars, WLR radars, battlefield surveillance radars, the Agni-III, ALH, a wide range of SONARs developed for the navy etc. The above list had minimal outside help. We could make a list out of the subsystems and easily understand how much of institutionalised research has gone into them.

We know for a fact that in 1992 China delivered M11 missiles - actual missiles. Bhutto herself has acknowledged the transfer of technology from North Korea and yet Pakistan claims these missiles to be totally local. You guys bought 30 missiles followed by a supply of M-11 and M-18 missiles. Bhutto was the Prime Minister who bought the missiles from North Korea.


Apparently Bhutto has also acknowledged that designs were authorized to be paid for in cash only and not nuclear technology. :))

http://www.sipri.org/contents/expcon/Pakistan.pdf
rediff.com: Pakistan's Nuclear and Missile Programme: The Multiple Dimensions
Foreign Policy: A Tale of Two Bhuttos

Compare that to India acquiring sub-systems or co-development. We did the guidance, navigation plus the ground launchers for Brahmos. The roles of Thales and Elta of Israel have been openly acknowledged in India.

Co-development is totally different from technology transfer/production line transfer. We do the first. You buy the second.

If you guys were any bit honest about your rockets - you'd not be struggling to make a decent SLV. Don't kid the world guys. The 'betrayal of Pakistan by Muslim brothers' comment by Musharaf was a nice one. He was speaking about Libya and Iran I suppose ? ;)

The linkage between various collaborative projects and the "sudden success" (after 25 years in some cases) is pretty obvious.

With all due respect that is horse pucky. The ALH, Rajendra,AGNI, Prithvi, Samyuktha, Ajanta, the whole array of SONARS, the whole array of INSAS, 3D-CAR, the Indra SERIES of radars, the whole ARJUN project, PINAKA, the whole array of torpedoes are some of the products that attained maturity BEFORE much foreign assistance was available.

For example the LCA FCS was done locally after L&M denied assistance.

What I've described are a whole array of systems, some of them are megasystems that take decades to develop and mature. 25 years is nothing relatively speaking. The recent foreign collobaration is welcome but it does not take away one bit of credit away from the DRDO.For example, bringing in a LAHAT cannot make ARJUN an Israeli tank.

Bringing in a TCS cannot make the PINAKA a Israeli product because we develop the rocket, the launch system, the fire control system and integrated it into the Artillery network. The TCS was just a fine-tuning. It helped having it - we could squeeze a little bit extra from our weapon now.

Now compare all this to Pakistan buying the very blueprints of missiles from outside and making a copy locally. Apples to oranges.

The issue with claims of local development is that the games being played by Pakistan are dangerous. They involve weapons of mass destruction and you guys lie to the world with a straight face.

MOD EDIT: OFF TOPIC
 
Con and Su-47,

Don't mistake my pointing out collaboration with the Russians and French as indicating that India has not done anything. The attempts at producing those weapons systems locally obviously indicate a high degree of local R and D and the requisite infrastructure, after several decades of investment. But nonetheless the influence of foreign input to finalize those products, and overcome bottlenecks cannot be ignored either.

Samudra,

Pakistan did not have the resources, human or capital, to go for massive infrastructural and institutional development in such programs that India did. At the same time, the development of Pakistani institutions and R&D in various fields cannot be ignored either. "Importing a blueprint" does not mean that there is no need for Scientists, technicians and the assorted facilities to turn those blue prints into products. I am not ashamed of Pakistan choosing a route that better fit its situation - that we have the knowhow, the institutions, facilities and Scientists and technicians to continue development and R&D in newer products is what counts.

However this thread is about the Indian TM's, so the tangential Pakistan discussion will end at this point.

The last part of your post is ranting off topic rubbish and has been deleted. You can make that point in a relevant thread.
 
I am not ashamed of Pakistan choosing a route that better fit its situation - that we have the knowhow, the institutions, facilities and Scientists and technicians to continue development and R&D in newer products is what counts.

Pakistan might have a few mature products in hand but continuous development and follow up R&D it cannot hope to have until a bottom-up approach is adopted. There are no shortcuts in science. Possessing the technology to manufacture is totally different from being to develop something from scratch - there will be zero scope for major improvements. What we will continue to see is a subsystem replaced here and there - anything farther than that will involve a lot of pain and I'm yet to see any structured research program undertaken in Pakistan. Things just appear suddenly. :)

Besides, nobody complains about tactical systems anyway.

The tangential is very relevant and highlights maturity on part of our leadership vis-a-vis Pakistani leadership.
 
Pakistan might have a few mature products in hand but continuous development and follow up R&D it cannot hope to have until a bottom-up approach is adopted. There are no shortcuts in science. Possessing the technology to manufacture is totally different from being to develop something from scratch - there will be zero scope for major improvements. What we will continue to see is a subsystem replaced here and there - anything farther than that will involve a lot of pain and I'm yet to see any structured research program undertaken in Pakistan. Things just appear suddenly. :)

Besides, nobody complains about tactical systems anyway.

The tangential is very relevant and highlights maturity on part of our leadership vis-a-vis Pakistani leadership.

Your contention about a lack of "structured research programs" is only based on the fact that the Pakistani military remains a very secretive institution, and that extends to all the strategic institutions as well. Us Pakistani defense buffs are the first to complain about the lack of information about the various programs being worked upon, but simply suggesting that because information isn't available and "products appear out of thin air" proves nothing, except that the military prefers to highlight developments only when it is assured the programs have succeeded. Perhaps this is a result of collaboration with the Chinese military, which itself has followed a policy of keeping most of its projects low key. One example was the introduction of the J-10, which caught quite a few Western observers by surprise.

The whole thing about "no short cuts in science" is a canard in this context. "Science" is not the same as "technology". There are indeed no alternative to undertaking extensive R&D to develop new products, but one doesn't have to reinvent the first combustion engine every single time you start off with designing a new one - you work off your existing experiences and knowledge-base to refine and/or improve. Getting "blue prints" for existing technology can provide you with the expertise and knowledge-base built up to that point, rather than starting from scratch. It doesn't preclude you from engaging in R&D from that point on, provided you have the requisite infrastructure and human resources to absorb and build upon the knowledge gained. Pakistan has the institutions, it has the scientists, it managed to put in enough money, and it got the head start it needed in certain areas.

On the missile issue, apparently a few of the retired Western Military Folk on the WAB believe that China ceased collaboration with Pakistan in 1992 after signing the NPT. But then other analysts will argue otherwise so that is neither here nor there. On the issue of NK and Chinese technology - Even if we assume that NK and Chinese technology may indeed have been utilized in the Ghauri 1 and Shaheen 1 - the Shaheen 1 was tested with a range larger than that of the M-9 (indicating at least some indigenous improvement over the M-9), while the Ghauri 2 far exceeded the range of the Nodong, as did the Shaheen 2 that of the M-9. Indians will of course claim "more Pakistani paint jobs on Chinese missiles", but a few retired Western military people on the WAB apparently believe that China ceased collaboration with Pakistan after signing the NPT in 1992. So indeed it was Pakistani R&D and investment that resulted in the further development of both BM's and the more recent cruise missiles.

Another related "indigenous effort" - the development of a SAM system (based off the Anza) that was reportedly fielded in trials against the MBDA Spada. The trials also involved a Chinese SAM system, so unlikely that the Pakistani system was a complete "license copy", since it would be in direct comp. with the Chinese system. The Chinese and Pakistani systems were reportedly rejected. This would indicate that Pakistani R&D on local SAM systems is existent and continuing.

The only programs that "our leadership" has not "credited" foreign assistance, have been programs that would have put our allies under sanction/censure (missiles restricted under MTCR). Other programs that involve foreign collaboration such as the Anza series and the Bakhtar Shikan, Al-Khalid are openly described as either licensed production of Chinese Weapons systems, or collaborative efforts. That a lack of maturity is exhibited by leaders such as Nawaz and BB, when they go around blabbing (correctly or incorrectly) about events that potentially embarrass our allies or inflate body counts to score political points, I won't deny.
 
Your contention about a lack of "structured research programs" is only based on the fact that the Pakistani military remains a very secretive institution, and that extends to all the strategic institutions as well.

Being secretive is only seen as a rather poor excuse to justify the outright purchase of arms, designs from outside markets being passed off as products born out of local efforts because....

but simply suggesting that because information isn't available and "products appear out of thin air" proves nothing

Information is very much available. It just doesn't suit Pakistan right now. Information about which Pakistani Prime Minister approved purchase of designs from NK after a certain meeting with A.Q.Khan is available.

We have information that Pakistan cannot yet send a satellite into space but is able to produce a new variety of ballistic missiles is very much available. That information is enough for me to pronounce Pakistani claims on being able to produce these Chinese/North Korean missiles an outright lie.

Perhaps this is a result of collaboration with the Chinese military, which itself has followed a policy of keeping most of its projects low key. One example was the introduction of the J-10, which caught quite a few Western observers by surprise.

Wrong example. The J-10 was hardly a surprise. It ain't a full LAVI but atleast we knew where it came from and we know how good or bad it is for sometime.
The infrastructure and the whole assortment of institutions that produce quality products cannot be hidden. The fact that we don't see them, at least their parallels in the civilian sector is proof enough that they are non-existent.

Getting "blue prints" for existing technology can provide you with the expertise and knowledge-base built up to that point, rather than starting from scratch. It doesn't preclude you from engaging in R&D from that point on, provided you have the requisite infrastructure and human resources to absorb and build upon the knowledge gained.

There is zero knowledge gained by building products from blueprints. You cannot make your own cycle after learning to assemble them from spare parts and raw materials supplied by outsides. You will have zero understanding about the laws of science that run a cycle and you will only learn it when you design and build yourselves one.

The Chinese are still buying engines from Russia. But hey, they've been license producing engines with ToT for how many decades ?

Come on a basic SLV! If you can locally do a Ghauri, Shaheen whatever.....a very very basic SLV is a walk in the park. Why is Pakistan still struggling to do shoot up a simple SLV rocket ?

On the missile issue, apparently a few of the retired Western Military Folk on the WAB believe that China ceased collaboration with Pakistan in 1992 after signing the NPT

The same people believe Pakistan has not operationalized any of its strategic missiles. They doubt Pakistan possessing any locally made functional nuke at all. They also believe the much hastily done second series of tests by Pakistan could have Chinese origins. I respect whoever these Western Military folk are but I won't take their word to be the absolute truth.

while the Ghauri 2 far exceeded the range of the Nodong, as did the Shaheen 2 that of the M-9.

All missiles can be made to go a little longer with a little fiddling.

Another related "indigenous effort" - the development of a SAM system (based off the Anza) that was reportedly fielded in trials against the MBDA Spada.

I know nothing about this new development. I'm sorry I cannot comment about this.

That a lack of maturity is exhibited by leaders such as Nawaz and BB, when they go around blabbing (correctly or incorrectly) about events that potentially embarrass our allies or inflate body counts to score political points, I won't deny.

They're politicians not Leaders. Pakistan has never had a true leader.
 
Back
Top Bottom