What's new

Pakistan refuses to open India-Afghanistan road link, says conduct trade via Karachi

Nop, we won the 65 war, we had captured more territory at the end of the war then u had, pics of captured indian towns have been posted to death on this forum, the only thing which u show is "Patton Nagar", when u claim Pakistan left its patton tanks, it was cuz indians opened water in the fields , tanks weren't amphibious , it was deep inside Indian territory probably 20-30 km, yet shamelessly u show it to ur people, that Pakistan left these tanks in ur territory.

Really ? Who told you this ?
India lost only 540 km2 & you lost 1,840 km2

Khemkaran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You never defeated Pakistan on its mainland, E.Pakistan had hostile bengali poppulation who were fighting Pakistan,

Maybe that's why you lost some territory in the west as well ?
 
. .
wow so wikipedia is your source, what if today I make the changes to the numbers on this link and use a blog as a citation ,will u still believe it !!!

Wikipedia holds good,as long as citations are there
 
.
See, as I said before Indians are enjoying a Modi orgasm, when a person is in orgasm, he is fantasizing , just the way u guys are lol, If u won the 48 conflict, why did u loose 50% Kashmir region (Azad Kashmir & Gilgit Baltistan) to Pakistan’s tribesmen (couldn’t even face them, lmao), and why couldn’t u take back any of that Kashmir (which u whine till now is occupied by Pakistan) in the wars which u say u won, The world knew the reality of the outcome of these wars back then and the world knows it now, its only the Indians who are in the Modi Orgasm phase. Enjoy this !!!
B_fVTlxUcAE8ueW.jpg:large


Modi is just another Prime Minister .But the capability is that of India .In 1948 Nehru epic folly helped you.
It is you that is in orgasm of deluded fantasy.

Your nation is just irrelevant to our foreign policy .Can you see that ?
 
.
Maybe that's why you lost some territory in the west as well ?

Oh really which territory did we loose, here is some thing for u to enjoy, since u posted a link about Khemkarn,
Pak soldiers in Khemkarn
images

pic_65war_khemkaran.jpg


Kishangarh fort Rajhistan
240-423x300.jpg


After capturing town of Monabhao
1965-Indo-Pak-War-Memorabilia-A-Pakistani-soldier-at-Munabao-Railway-Station-Photos-and-Mementos-of-1965-War.jpg


Modi is just another Prime Minister .But the capability is that of India .In 1948 Nehru epic folly helped you.
It is you that is in orgasm of deluded fantasy.

Your nation is just irrelevant to our foreign policy .Can you see that ?
Hmm, so we are irrelevant that's why you have deployed 3/4 of your army at our borders, good going kid !!!
 
.
You won one tank battle-not the 1965 war.And what happened in 1971 ?



lol,It was Pakistan who started the 1965 war,with the objective of invading Kashmir.And you ended up losing twice the area of land you managed to capture,and ended up fighting to save lahore from Indian invasion.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:Kid we took our operations in a non recognizable border ie line of control. We didnt crossed nor did anything in international border recognized by United Nations. Thats why u had to come under immense pressure by international bodies to stop that war, even yr Shastri died of a heart attack who tried to invade our country in the treaty of Tashkent. Yr government still blames us of kashmir valley's all troubles even after the 1965 war, so u certainly couldnt stop us from doing that and u couldnt dare to attack us again after 71 era. So who failed to achieve its objective, the primary objective?

Let me tell u our objectives were to defend our country at all costs and get our land back and we did got that in tashkent treaty. Our goals wasnt to invade or hold yr territory in international borders that was done so that we could get our territory back in exchange. And we did just that. So who in the end achieved their goals or not is for everyone to see.

But let go this, u answer my questions first!
 
.
we will deal centeral asia thru china india sud try Charbahar if we cant go thru Afg then i bet india will not even step one feet on AFG.. if they think they blackmeal Pak.


or an idiot like can say its not safe... but its not a question about safe or unsafe .. you and your stuff will not go thru Pakistan simple.. why so much crying?

Only an idiot like you will say that pak is safe for transit and that too at afghan border. It is not india which made a request. it is made by Afghan president. But i guess education is not your cup of tea.
 
.
Oh really which territory did we loose, here is some thing for u to enjoy,

You lost much of your territory in in the Sialkot & Lahore sectors

Brig.Hari_Singh_at_Barkee_Capture.jpg


:rofl::rofl::rofl:Kid we took our operations in a non recognizable border ie line of control. We didnt crossed nor did anything in international border recognized by United Nations. Thats why u had to come under immense pressure by international bodies to stop that war, even yr Shastri died of a heart attack who tried to invade our country in the treaty of Tashkent. Yr government still blames us of kashmir valley's all troubles even after the 1965 war, so u certainly couldnt stop us from doing that and u couldnt dare to attack us again after 71 era. So who failed to achieve its objective, the primary objective?

Typical troll post.

Let me tell u our objectives were to defend our country at all costs and get our land back and we did got that in tashkent treaty. Our goals wasnt to invade or hold yr territory in international borders that was done so that we could get our territory back in exchange. And we did just that. So who in the end achieved their goals or not is for everyone to see.

Your intention was to 'liberate' IOK,which you couldn't achieve. pushing your army back to their pre-conflict positions was our objective.Keep believing conspiracy theories,Zaid Hamid !

o u certainly couldnt stop us from doing that and u couldnt dare to attack us again after 71 era

Doing what ? Supporting terrorism ?
We attacked you again in 1971.Case closed.
 
.
Typical troll post.



Your intention was to 'liberate' IOK,which you couldn't achieve. pushing your army back to their pre-conflict positions was our objective.Keep believing conspiracy theories,Zaid Hamid !



Doing what ? Supporting terrorism ?
We attacked you again in 1971.Case closed.
LOl u seriously believe with just 60,000 troops one can evade a territory as big as Kashmir valley? without even air, arty support against an army which is mammoth in comparison to yr combine tri services???

Kid arnt u by any chance an eunuch also like the bunch of people who run yr country?
 
.
LOl u seriously believe with just 60,000 troops one can evade a territory as big as Kashmir valley? without even air, arty support against an army which is mammoth in comparison to yr combine tri services???

Your generals always do have such delusions.

eunuch also like the bunch of people who run my country?

Like Musharaff ? Such eunuchs are plenty in Pakistan.
 
.
Your generals always do have such delusions.



Like Musharaff ? Such eunuchs are plenty in Pakistan.
bwahaha and still he gives chills to yr entire 1.2 billion worthless kind!!!!! Common kid answer my questions.
 
.
.
. .
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom