Always Neutral
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
- Messages
- 4,859
- Reaction score
- -20
I did not include NATO countries as the NATO constitution ensures that they will be on UK side if any one attacks the British soldiers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bunch of a**h**** sponsored by RAW through afghanistan and dont worry tribal elders are already taking care of them and the remaining will be taken cared off by PA. In case you forget the BLA sponsored by you people, his leader got his *** kicked( dont need to rite the name)
Dude, dont write like that. You look like a 12 year old kid to the readers. Honestly!
Oh i forgot RAW.
Webby please save the thread from blocking and sending to Tresh.
I hope you understand.
And Bull come up with solid arguments as expected from a member like you and not one liners
Joint exercises by Indian said:Dear AM, Jana, Ice Cold,
just wondering why Pakistan did not protest to USA when they send their soldiers to Ladakh. Why you guys wan't to shell British Soldiers and not US soldiers ? Double standards ?
Best Regards
Dear AM, Jana, Ice Cold,
just wondering why Pakistan did not protest to USA when they send their soldiers to Ladakh. Why you guys wan't to shell British Soldiers and not US soldiers ? Double standards ?
Best Regards
Okay WM my last post here on this issue.
For AM,
Both Siachen and Ladakh are disputed areas so you need to protest on both areas not when its civilians only. Threaten USA and I would be impressed and sympathetic.
Regards
I'll protest whatever I feel like protesting, and not to "impress" you. I made an argument, you can counter it, but saying that I shouldn't protest X ( and I am not sure what "protest" of mine you are referring to, since I said that a "million tourists won't affect the situation on the ground") because I don't protest Y is logically flawed. People pick and choose their battles. I never heard of the US/India exercise in Laddakh till this thread, so I'm not really well enough informed about that particular issue to comment on it.
There is probably a battalion of assault rifle toting Indian soldiers at Siachen since 1984.And probably an equal number of Pakistani soldiers a little lower down the slopes. So how are 1 or 2 dozen unarmed trekkers a "threat" to peace at Siachen?