Pakistan needs a Two Child Policy

[mqur1963]

if I can afford I like to have 12 children

 

[Khanate]

Fundamentally the wrong premise.

Pakistan needs to focus on developing its human capital by investing in education. Family planning can be part of the social services but turning it into a policy is going too far.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Indian government thought of the same policy. But soon realized, it's a stupid decision. Instead of thinking population as a burden, think of it as an Asset. You can export brains like India and China does.
peace out>>>

 

[HAIDER]

The 6th Most populous country
Pakistan's population is on a Climb.
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/pakistan-population/

Pakistan approximately the size of US state of Texas went from 50,000,000 in 1950 to 200,000,000 in 2016.
Since India is set to overtake China in the race to the most Populated country in the next few years,Problems for India will creep up more and more,China has far better Living standard and managed to improve the lives of 600 million living in poverty.
In 2012, the Indian government stated 22% of its population is below its official poverty limit. The World Bank, in 2011 based on 2005's PPPs International Comparison Program, estimated 23.6% of Indian population, or about 276 million people, lived below $1.25 per day on purchasing power parity.

Almost 50 percent of mumbai population lives in slums .It is the most populous city in India and the ninth most populous agglomeration in the world

With Pakistan trying to learn "The art of China" with all the Chinese wisdom and CPEC why not learn another thing to reduce the biggest problem of Pakistan.
I often hear Pakistanis say We're the 6th most populous country in the world (Fun fact).
We can't even provide food education and health to an already out of hand population.

Pakistan is a immensely troubled country ,Lets get real.
According to a report, nearly 39 percent of Pakistanis live in multidimensional poverty, with the highest rates of poverty in FATA and Balochistan. Pakistan's MPI showed a strong decline, with national poverty rates falling from 55% to 39% from 2004 to 2015.
In 2011, 12.4% of Pakistanis live below in Pakistan's definition of poverty however According to the World Bank, poverty in Pakistan fell from 64.3% in 2002 to 29.5% in 2014.
What's so special about this steep decline? It just represents the immense resilience of our people,No matter the odds always looking forward and having a positive mindset to improve their lives.
The effects of over-population for Pakistan are extremely disconcerting not because it cannot overcome the problem but because there is being done absolutely nothing to stop it.
More population mean's everything from.

1. Unemployment leading to crime
   
2. Rising Taxes and economic burden, Mostly the poor have the most children and that creates problems
   
3. Problems with healthcare(Doctors won't be enough so will hospitals)
   
4. Fleeing Immigrants (Very bad image for country)
5. More traffic (If it hasn't sucked enough to drive in Islamabad /Rawalpindi already from 2011 on-wards there has been a Huge increase in traffic) With all the Little boys with no skill for driving crashing into good drivers.
   
6. Transport and Infrastructure problems, Make new Metro buses (Gonna need at least 3 in Twin cities),Widen the roads as a result of Booming population.
7. Education ,We've got a sorry $*it System that encourages hate between different classes,From everything to cambridge Edexcel IB yada yada to Government school and Mullah madrasa's, Can't provide education to an already huge population and it also leads to a special type of social radicalization that contributes to all the mess of Fake Jihad,Kill muslims and Infidels B.S
   
8. Problems with city planning ,Not every Pakistani city can become (DHA or Bahria town) ,Just look at what has happened to Karachi from Partition and 1960s onward ,Even 1970s it looked a cleaner and beautiful city.
9. More trash to take care of, We ain't recycling everything so just leave it off at Clifton or Margalla hills.
10. Less people is freaking fantastic,Make the world a better place by getting rid of the special type that have 50 children and 6 wives,Ultimately the wife concept has to be revised to solve our stupid social issues ,Only 1 marriage per Boy/Man ,Don't screw that up lay down 2 eggs with one person mess the marriage up and go lay down another 2 with the other

Financial punishment Should be imposed depending on the economic standing of the family after every 2nd Child:

Super rich Class (Nawaz sharif ,Mian mansha etc) 80 Lac's per year
Upper-Class 30 Lacs A year Depending on Monthly Income
Middle Upper 10 lacs
Middle Middle 6 lacs
Middle lower 5 lacs
Lower 2 lacs Penalty after a Limit of 4 Children (Because most of them contribute to the agriculture sector and we need more farmers and laborers)
Lower lower (None) ?

2 child policy is not necessarily should be the limit,You can impose penalties on class systems if they cross the limit,Years of tax evasion will be retrieved from all classes especially the corrupt Super rich.

PS:
No religious bashing and constructive criticism only,Don't go off topic (Keep it in between India Pakistan population)

Pakistan need " no child policy " for next 5 years. ..lol. 2 child policy is need of time. Introduce brith control measures.

 

[Solomon2]

first of all I agree with the OP, but before bringing in the 2 child policy there needs to be a census to find the exact figure -

Such a census should include number of kids/family and their income if it's to be useful. But I'm not sure it's necessary at all.

My yearly Encyclopedia Britannica World Books tell an interesting story of Pakistan's efforts at population control. In the late 1960s it was accepted that family planning was important and did not violate religious principles. By the mid-1970s, however, this position was reversed, mostly thanks to the influence of Arab oil money upon Pakistan's schools and mosques.

 

[Solomon2]

We do not need a 2 count policy, atleast not yet. What we do need to do is mandatory -

Why the emphasis on force rather than education, access to birth control, and respect for women's rights?

 

[.]

Pakistan need " no child policy " for next 5 years. ..lol. 2 child policy is need of time. Introduce brith control measures.

Yaar humari qom Signal par wait nahi karti ,Ap etni bari baat kar rahe ho ?
Birth control is redundant in Pakistan ,Molvi brigade will declare it Haram and in return Operation "Overload" will begin to crush the haram sazish

View attachment 360033





No words for people like him...other than someone immediately castrate him. Stupid Pathan

Impose 10 Crore tax on him,See if he achieves the target

 

[Lagay Raho]

in islam the decision of family planning rests entirely on the couple. if they want few kids it depends on them and there are means of family planning allowed in islam. however, it is simply not allowed to make it a law or policy to restrict the number of kids. if someone does it he goes against the laws made by Allah and Prophet SAW which means he/ she thinks he is better law maker then the creator.
people will call me mullah or whatever but i my job is to say what is allowed in islam and what is not. i do not force it on others .

can u kindly tell in which ayat or hadith it says that?

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Almost 50 percent of mumbai population lives in slums .It is the most populous city in India and the ninth most populous agglomeration in the world

What is relationship you are drawing between population growth and slums?

China with its 1 child policy followed for decades has larger slum population than India

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...ackground-Paper.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 

[RazaGujjar]

Why the emphasis on force rather than education, access to birth control, and respect for women's rights?

Call me a cynic. But we live in a country were laws are made to be broken. Less than say 6, is not hard too hard to ask.

Perhaps we could start by educating the poor on proper family planning and give out free condoms as organizations in the developed world tend to do. Once that fails, then regulate by force.

 

[HAIDER]

Yaar humari qom Signal par wait nahi karti ,Ap etni bari baat kar rahe ho ?
Birth control is redundant in Pakistan ,Molvi brigade will declare it Haram and in return Operation "Overload" will begin to crush the haram sazish


Impose 10 Crore tax on him,See if he achieves the target

Jahil molvi, literacy and poverty is the cause. Not poverty, but govt can work for the eradication of rest of two.

We do not need a 2 count policy, atleast not yet. What we do need to do is mandatory vasectomy after 6 kids. Gone should be the days of people having 6-7 kids has our elders did. It is always the poor that have the most kids too.



View attachment 360033





No words for people like him...other than someone immediately castrate him. Stupid Pathan

Rabbit by nature....if he is human being .

 

[saurav jha]

How can you implement 2 child policy when you have 4 marriage policy?
Sincere question family planning is against Islam. Right?

 

[Imran Khan]

i am with one child policy

 

[Zarvan]

Look at China. They brought their population down with a one child policy. Are they not powerful? There are limited resources on Earth that can only support a finite number of people. Population growth happens exponentially so u can hit the tipping point relatively quickly. In any case Pakistan's current population is plenty for its size. This is where it should be stabilized with a two child policy.

Yes one child policy will soon become the biggest source of downfall of China. China will soon have lot more old people than young ones and that is disaster for economy and the country.

On topic no 2 child policy is going to happen in Pakistan. Sorry this crap is not allowed in Islam and Muslims prefer Islam over this crap. Secondly we need to control corruption and other problems rather than controlling population.

 

[Russell]

Sincere question family planning is against Islam. Right?

Sterilization and Abortion are against Islam, but Family Planning? Absolutely not.