Bilal Khan (Quwa)
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 7,004
- Reaction score
- 97
- Country
- Location
With FACs, there are 2 approaches the PN should pursue together:No thanks. Obsolete and very expensive operate.
As for the Azmat class, the 3rd ship i think already replaced the twin 25mm cannon with what appears to be a Aselsan 30mm SMASH or 25mm STOP. In this new variant i expect the same, but would much prefer a 30mm CIWS like type 1130 equiped with 6 HQ-10. Gives more punch for defense. But that may be overkill. Additionally i think calling them FAC is slightly misleading in that they arent exactly fast. They are more like light corvettes. They are definitely more heavily armed than the typical FAC and carry either 8 C-802 or 6 Harba (AShCm/LACM). As @Bilal Khan (Quwa) stated there isna requirement for 4-6 more FAC. I would actually want PN to acquire rights for FAC-55 design. It appears far more stealthy and is far faster at 55knots and appears to have 8 cell RAM/FL-3000N capability.
1. Refine the FAC(M). Continue with the CODAD (range/endurance) and emphasis on deploying Harbah.
2. FAC-55: Buy into the program, and manufacture them at home while retaining the CODAG and heavy emphasis on low-observability/detectability. Equip the retractable launchers with the supersonic ASCM.
For both, we ought to figure out a SAM/PDMS solution. Either FL-3000N, or acquire/develop a small VLS-based system. Perhaps take a page from the Falaj-2 and fit the FAC(M) with VLS for Umkhonto and Cheetah C-RAM?