Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
'Corvette' and 'OPV' are empty terms now. Damen flatly said it built the Yarmouk-class to 'commercial standards,' so it's a standard-fare steel hull with steel superstructure design. The PN could've gotten that from anyone, even the US (e.g., Swiftships). The key is to ensure there are no ITAR-restricted items in the program, which is the crucial mistake Swiftships made with the Swift Corvette by looping in Lockheed Martin for the CMS. If given a second chance, Swiftships won't make the same mistake.Good strategy PN keep calling corvettes offshore patrol vessels so the usual powers trying to block weapons sales to Pakistan stay sound asleep.
*patsPNonback*
Sir is it possible to arm Yarmuk in near future with FM90N SAMs expected to be removed from F22P frigates as reportedly they shall also have VLS during mid life upgrades.'Corvette' and 'OPV' are empty terms now. Damen flatly said it built the Yarmouk-class to 'commercial standards,' so it's a standard-fare steel hull with steel superstructure design. The PN could've gotten that from anyone, even the US (e.g., Swiftships). The key is to ensure there are no ITAR-restricted items in the program, which is the crucial mistake Swiftships made with the Swift Corvette by looping in Lockheed Martin for the CMS. If given a second chance, Swiftships won't make the same mistake.
As for the weapons, we can source the most destructive parts domestically (AShM/LACM), while the less brazen ones (e.g., cannons, turrets, torpedoes, etc) are available at low-cost abroad.
I think the really interesting thing would be if we could take these low-cost designs a step further and add VLS to them. If we can roll-out a 1,500 to 2,000-ton "corvette" with AShW, ASW and AAW for less than $100 m per ship, then we'd have a solid fleet-builder asset.
You might need to replace the CIWS to make that possible. Best case scenario with the Yarmouk-class is installing a smaller pedestal SAM (e.g., Stinger-based). Otherwise, you need to design the ship to house SAMs from the start.Sir is it possible to arm Yarmuk in near future with FM90N SAMs expected to be removed from F22P frigates as reportedly they shall also have VLS during mid life upgrades.
Sir is it possible to arm Yarmuk in near future with FM90N SAMs expected to be removed from F22P frigates as reportedly they shall also have VLS during mid life upgrades.
You might need to replace the CIWS to make that possible. Best case scenario with the Yarmouk-class is installing a smaller pedestal SAM (e.g., Stinger-based). Otherwise, you need to design the ship to house SAMs from the start.
Sir FM90 despite limited range is reported to be capable to counter modern threats. PN should try to install same on lighter ships, meanwhile F22P should have VLS. PA has already inducted HQ7b and PN FM90. For some reason despite news Pakistan has still not got any specific defence related tech from Russia except transport helis, few Mi35 and perhaps ground based radar for safety of some particular installation.Well there is a couple things regarding Yarmook that need to be cleared up. #1 why was the rear starboard CIWS placed in that location? It seems it would only have a 180 degree arc of fire. #2, what will go on the pedestal on the top of the bridge? Is it an eggdome radar? Is it another CIWS? Is it an 8 cell PDMS? I cant say for sure, but it i suspect it will be an AK630. If it is not a CIWS, then the ship will only be protected in the back half. Beyond this, with respect to missile systems, you could see a pedestal style MANPAD like the Mistral based SIMBAD-RC or Igla based 3M47 Gibka or Komar, but i wish they would go for a system like TOR 2MKM which can be temporarily lashed to the deck above the hangar and allows for 16 missiles fired in VLS fashion with range of 15km, and are specifically designed to take out supersonic missiles. In peacetime operations the Tor 2MKM can be removed from the ship as it is designed to be lashed to decks whenever and wherever needed. This system should also be sought to replace the crotales systems in PA and PAF service as it is far more capable system.
I agree FM90 is an option, but only because PN already operates it. It has some major problems, not least of which is it only has 8 missiles. Reloading is manual in small ships like Yarmook and even medium size ships like F-22P. The other major drawback is the size and weight of the unit and the issue of its permanency. The soze and weiggt of the FM90 will preclude it from being installed anywhere on Yarmook without moving the main gun. Structural changes defeats the purpose of this ship. It also has only dirctional firing capability meaning only a specific firing arc. TheTor M2KM has the same range as FM90 (15km) but has some advantages.Sir FM90 despite limited range is reported to be capable to counter modern threats. PN should try to install same on lighter ships, meanwhile F22P should have VLS. PA has already inducted HQ7b and PN FM90. For some reason despite news Pakistan has still not got any specific defence related tech from Russia except transport helis, few Mi35 and perhaps ground based radar for safety of some particular installation.
There are some systems introduced by China combining CIWS and missiles.
I have a Question. there is lot of space on this ship's decks why cant a medium range sam launchers be set up the same way as anti ship missiles. i dont mean VLS