What like We make the funny section in R&AW or ORF’s morning briefs or something legit? Can I be quoted in StratNewsGlobal
I do notice some topic that get discussed on PDF end up in some vlogs, but what following does PDF actually have? Any nice legit think tanks?
There is one fairly professional (largely Turkish run) place that brings up (legacy era) PDF from time to time before the current rot really set into it after the core folks there were given the boot from here (largely because of the breakdown of earlier professional agreement here in order to please 2-3 specific troll-groups here).
To say more might get me in trouble though. But a few of them do follow the few remnants of professional competent types still here....but these are not really associated with what PDF at large has become now....in fact they are used to contrast away from rest of PDF.
PDF unfortunately really over-values clickbait toxic spam...overall 10 quantitative units of that has deliberately been made to take precedence over 1 qualitative unit of what once was here.
"Quantity" has a "quality" all of its own is the motif here at large now. It drives away certain things and festers other things in the end....you see it in social media at large.
This is probably the strongest indicator that Pakistan is hitching its cart more firmly to the BRI horse.
If it were so, its strange that CCP have deliberately not bailed out Pakistan by now with that clear long term picture in mind. While sitting on 3 trillion USD stockpile.
What percentage does say 10 billion make of it?
You can even use just PRC foreign investment denominator if you prefer.
All questions not really explored in any depth here. Guess we will let one more year play out....and then one more year after that and so on.
One should never look a gift horse in the mouth I suppose....especially to keep up the pretense it is one in the first place.
Narratives are some strange oasis in the expanses of sand dunes of reality.
which is why Pakistan will need to get a major ECONOMIC deal from China to offset the potential blowback .
It would have already happened if it were the case surely?
Or are we at some high water mark on certain things given other things the Chinese are long uncomfy/untrusting with?
Have enough of the Pak establishment commited to learning the Chinese language in basic way?
Have a sufficient amount of the Pak establishment coterie packed up their bags and left western shores to live and make their bread (economic and political musical chair exile divvying up for circus theatrics organised more by the CCP this time) in China?
Be it papa johns wherewithall or a majority of political movers and shakers being in london all the time depending who is exiled to their properties there, dual citizenship and all.
PRC comfy with this dual citizenship Pak establishment uses with the west?
Or the regular laypeople raw connections with the west (esp anglo saxon countries) for economic sustenance that will always be something the PRC will never provide and onshore a substitute for.
What percentage ought to be displayed on actual real trust and commitment on these matters to the CCP?
Is it 0.1% now or 1% to begin with?....does it need to get to 10% or higher than that to get say a commensurate unlocking of what CCP has (and now getting overleveraged on itself)?
What does the Pak establishment keep close to its chest for various reasons regarding DC to begin with that the CCP might want forked out to show trust to progress things?
Why might the Pak establishment be reluctant to give anything past a point there to keep things open and hedged there?
Give it another year or two and see for yourself I guess.
If its just status quo top off stuff rather than drastic instrumental change in something here...., it would be clear at least to some what the actual reality is imposing itself and what rock and hard place Pakistan establishment is stuck in and tied Pakistan at large to it as well.