Pakistan military planes violated Indian air space twice this year

[SQ8]

How can you say that Are you waiting for them to drop bombs on us than only IAF should retaliate, it's Indian airspace & any plane crossing it is an intrusion weather armed or not.

A brash attitude like this is thankfully not seen in professional forces like the IAF..
Aircraft about to violate airspace(5-10 min out and inside no-mans land) are warned on guard channels first.
If they do not turn back .. interceptors are scrambled...

In this case .. PAF aircraft heard the warning.. and turned back..
all in a days work for both sides.

 

[Dash]

The Indian Defense Minister Anthony has been involved in many corruption scandals and cover ups, so I do not believe the facts in this report.

Get your facts right, woh khata bhi nahin nahin khilata hei types...

 

[JayAtl]

Oh yes it is..

You can keep your BS sarcasm.. holds no weight with me...
23 times in three years... your "world press" could only come up with concentrating on the violation instead of the decrease in them..oh goodness me.. somebody "violated us".. right...and it wasnt even close to "first base"..
As pointed out by your countryman..an airspace violation is taken whenever that no-man's land is breached... your chopper landed at our base and got sent back.. no harm done.. procedures followed..
Not one Indian newspaper chose to focus on the reduction of violations or anything else.
As for the jingo source.. it decided to come up with India being violated twice this year
Lets see what else do they post up..
How Pakistan came to feel snug in a Chinese pocket - Analysis - DNA
Just another coup in Bangladesh, a nightmare in Pakistan - Analysis - DNA
Analysis: Is Pakistan helping Haqqanis attack US in Afghanistan? - Analysis - DNA

It on quality of reporting.. people can choose to focus on the positive..
or like you..find every other excuse to throw trash at a nation.

you are changing the goal post, typical of your postings here - where you initially never NEVER asserted that the issue you had was with the claim made in the statement itself. YOUR FIRST post here was to call the whole article false reporting! and now you trying to play it off as you had an issue with the " claim of x amount of incursions". See below you attacking the SOURCE and not what you have pivoted to now .

Its the same jingo source that had Indian scientists dismissing the Shaheen-1A as nothing spectacular..

Also look at the links you have provided. they are opinion or what it clearly states " analysis" pieces . There is difference between opinion pieces and this article , which was a factual reporting about the statement made.

Finally Oscar- I did not trash a nation- I thrashed your poor ability to comprehend what was reported as it being false to suit your meme. you may ban me now ...

 

[tvsram1992]

i think report is not from a credible source, IAF dont want to loose its fighters to PAF and leave open air space for China

Dont worry we can afford to lose one Aakash SAM for your F-16 Why would we hit your plane with a plane man . China dont have predator drones which can roam freely over a country tongue:

 

[SQ8]

you are changing the goal post, typical of your postings here - where you initially never NEVER asserted that the issue you had was with the claim made in the statement itself. YOUR FIRST post here was to call the whole article false reporting! and now you trying to play it off as you had an issue with the " claim of x amount of incursions". See below you attacking the SOURCE and not what you have pivoted to now .



Also look at the links you have provided. they are opinion or what it clearly states " analysis" pieces . There is difference between opinion pieces and this article , which was a factual reporting about the statement made.

Finally Oscar- I did not trash a nation- I thrashed your poor ability to comprehend what was reported as it being false to suit your meme. you may ban me now ...

I chose to attack what was taken as the jist of the report. And that is my meme.
You on the other hand.. have been whining about yourself for a long time.. targeting the forum for your own bias.

sorry, not interested in following your patten of behaviour.