What's new

Pakistan: India's oath-taking snub result of 'domestic politics'

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...result-domestic-politics-190528093007708.html

d903a9a0ca7f4bc0b37b186f79a214f2_18.jpg


Islamabad, Pakistan - Pakistan has attributed the snub of India not inviting its Prime Minister Imran Khan for Narendra Modi's oath-taking ceremony to the Indian leader's election campaign that "focus[ed] on Pakistan-bashing".

Speaking to a Pakistani television news channel on Monday evening, Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi reiterated his country's invitation to India to engage in dialogue on all outstanding issues.

Relations between the two countries have yet to thaw after a military standoff following a suicide attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed at least 40 people in mid-February.

The nuclear-armed neighbours have fought two of their three wars since independence in 1947 over the disputed territory of Kashmir.

India accused Pakistan of "controlling" the attack and the Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM) armed group that carried it out. Pakistan denied any connection to the attack or JeM.


The standoff saw both sides conduct air attacks on each other's territory, and an Indian fighter jet shot down during an aerial dogfight.

India suspended all dialogue following the standoff, and Modi made frequent references to the military action against Pakistan during an election campaign that saw him sweep back to power, winning 303 of the 542 seats in India's parliament.

His National Democratic Alliance won 352 seats in all, according to official results.

"The issue on which Narendra Modi fought the election, the whole focus was on Pakistan bashing [and] on fanning nationalism," Pakistani Foreign Minister Qureshi told Geo News on Monday.

"Now, to expect that he will be able to rid himself of that narrative within a moment, and open himself up to the entire opposition's criticism, that is unlikely."

'Hold dialogue on real issues'
Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led the right-wing alliance to sweep back to power on the back of a platform promising economic prosperity, and frequently referred to hardline action against Pakistan as a form of nationalism that India was in need of.

On Monday, Raveesh Kumar, the Indian foreign ministry spokesperson, said that India's invitations to the oath-taking were "in line with government's focus on its 'Neighbourhood First' policy".

India is inviting the leaders of Bangladesh, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Nepal, Bhutan, Mauritius and Kyrgyzstan to the oath-taking on May 30, according to a government statement.

Qureshi reiterated that Pakistan desired a resumption of bilateral dialogue with India, not an invitation to a ceremony.

"Even if [Pakistani PM] Imran Khan did go, then what would we have gained from attending this oath-taking? We can only attain something when we hold dialogue on the real issues."

Qureshi briefly met Indian Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj on the sidelines of a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting in Kyrgyzstan last week, the highest-level contact between the two countries since the military standoff in February and March.

The two leaders held an informal conversation, the Pakistani foreign minister said.

Asad Hashim is Al Jazeera's digital correspondent in Pakistan. He tweets @AsadHashim.
 
.
Well we all know the real reason is Indians are sore losers.
 
.
Who gives a sh*t , and besides after all the thrashing we gave them on 27th Feb , i did'nt even expect them to invite IK ...
 
.
your ceremony, your prerogative to invite whomever you want. nothing wrong in that. Why so much fuss?
 
.
For F*ck sake, who would want to go to a ceremony of a filthy tree monkey Modi?? It would be a national embarrassment. The writer is shameless creature who writes worthless articles.
 
. . .
It's for the best. Pakistan should forget about India and vacate the land it illegally occupies. The destiny of Pakistan lies west with Afghanistan, Yemen, and Iraq.
 
.
It's not a "snub"

this relationship is too complicated, spl in light of recent events and flare ups.

it would not have made sense to invite Pakistan to this one, only given them an opportunity to decline and win propaganda points.

first we completely annihilate the militant Islamic separatists and dismantle their infrastructure, then we'll talk.
 
.
For F*ck sake, who would want to go to a ceremony of a filthy tree monkey Modi?? It would be a national embarrassment. The writer is shameless creature who writes worthless articles.
You should ask the last guy. He was invited to the party.
 
.
Salaam

Almost went to full blown war a few months ago, I don't know who actually expected an invite in the first place?
 
.
At this point, Imran Khan is acting like an annoying ex-girlfriend who just won't go away. India has been crystal-clear and consistent from day one. No formal talks can be held until Pakistan stops supporting terrorism against India. It is Pakistan/Imran Khan that always begs India for peace talks. Imran Khan should go back to begging Saudi and China for bailouts, and the IMF for a more favorable loan. He should also beg his generals to institute his "National Action Plan"(which means surrendering and doing what India wanted) so that it does not get blacklisted by the FATF. Maybe then there will be talks.
 
. .
At this point, Imran Khan is acting like an annoying ex-girlfriend who just won't go away. India has been crystal-clear and consistent from day one. No formal talks can be held until Pakistan stops supporting terrorism against India. It is Pakistan/Imran Khan that always begs India for peace talks. Imran Khan should go back to begging Saudi and China for bailouts, and the IMF for a more favorable loan. He should also beg his generals to institute his "National Action Plan"(which means surrendering and doing what India wanted) so that it does not get blacklisted by the FATF. Maybe then there will be talks.

We dont really want peace talks

We hate india

We just want the established fact that we repeatedly are asking for peace talks
 
.
Back
Top Bottom