Pakistan has no right to comment on India’s internal affairs: Salman Khurshid

[Jana Assassin]

Kashmir is the state such as urnchalpardesh which are captured by India.

Kashmir acceded to India bt i guess ur madrassas dont teach u anythng abt history....

 

[Jamwal's]

It is the first time in the entire Indian and Pakistan history that a serving senior ranked military officer was caught spying. Well not only that, but also having links with terrorists...

Very poor knowledge of history.

Not only India captured your uniformed troops, including commissioned officers for destabilisation/ Sabotaging - Pak govt itself acknowledge this by putting their names on ISPR - Shuhada Corner.

The case in point is Nk Zulfikar Ahmad - he was captured alive and died in our Hospital at Delhi.

Look at the operation he was assigned - Suicide attack.


Even the service number is given

Wikileaks - https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/...stan-ct-pakistani-army-virtually-owns-up.html

http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-sh...gent-on-suicide-mission-in-india/20101214.htm

 

[barbarosa]

Kashmir was part of ancient India... but that's different. and now kashmir is part of India and we've proof for it whether you accept it or not. Acc to UN it was pakistan who was the aggressor in 48. keep that in mind.

According to Indian historians India has rule over the hole world, will you say the hole world is the part of India?
Pakistan was really the part of India before 1947 but will you clime that Pakistan is the part of India and we can do any thing in it?
Kashmir's people are the original people of Kashmir and Aryans are migrated from Europe who occupied all India by force, At that time Kashmir was not the part of India.

 

[NALANDA]

1) Its time now that we need to start seeking merger with India of Pakistan Occupied Part of Kashmir and Pakistan Ceded part of Kashmir to China the way China does for Arunachal Pradesh where the inhabitants are totally Indian / with India.

2) Demography change for lasting peace in Kashmir.

This is the only solution. India has the population and means to do this. LETS DO THIS .

 

[barbarosa]

Kashmir acceded to India bt i guess ur madrassas dont teach u anythng abt history....

According to history Pakistan was the part of India, I think your history is wrong it teach you wrong history.
If the writer is Pakistani, he is wrong.
If the writer is Indian, he is wrong.
If the writer belong to the third country, he is right.

1) Its time now that we need to start seeking merger with India of Pakistan Occupied Part of Kashmir and Pakistan Ceded part of Kashmir to China the way China does for Arunachal Pradesh where the inhabitants are totally Indian / with India.

2) Demography change for lasting peace in Kashmir.

This is the only solution. India has the population and means to do this. LETS DO THIS .

Then China population is more than India but they has right to do so.

 

[$@rJen]

According to Indian historians India has rule over the hole world, will you say the hole world is the part of India?
Pakistan was really the part of India before 1947 but will you clime that Pakistan is the part of India and we can do any thing in it?
Kashmir's people are the original people of Kashmir and Aryans are migrated from Europe who occupied all India by force, At that time Kashmir was not the part of India.

I never claimed the whole world is part of India.. I claimed only whatever was part of Ancient India. and i clearly don't give a Damn about it now.

No. We respect the Partition and we recognize Pakistan as a Country. Kashmir also was a Sovereign country in 47 like India and Pakistan. So do tell me Why did Pakistan Attack Kashmir in 48???

kashmir consist of Jammu and Leh as well they're also the people of Kashmir for centuries. do consider that too.... you're only seeing some punch of people from the valley... Do consider the Pundits as well they're also the origins of Kashmir. Kashmir has the hindu Temples which is very older than Islam itself. Read the original History of Kashmir from the Neutral
source not from Pakistani Sites.

Now the real Question i want you to answer is Why was a Sovereign Kashmir Attacked by Pakistan in 48???, Kashmir was not a part of India or pakistan in 48.

 

[Danish saleem]

I think Indians forgot that according to UN, its a disputed territory.

 

[graphican]

Salman Khurshid is welcome to believe what he needs to believe. Pakistan believes and would say what Kashmirs say and Pakistan believes Kashmir is very much a Pakistani territory under Indian occupation. Don't like it, go complain UN.

 

[Jzaib]

Kashmir is disputed territory, Pakistan has every right to comment on the issue.

PS: Kashmirs from Occupied Kashmir region call themselves Pakistanis and raise our flags.

 

[F.O.X]

We are not commenting on your internal Matter my Khurshid... we are commenting on Indian Terrorism in Kashmir.. which is not a part of India..

 

[Jana Assassin]

According to history Pakistan was the part of India, I think your history is wrong it teach you wrong history.
If the writer is Pakistani, he is wrong.
If the writer is Indian, he is wrong.
If the writer belong to the third country, he is right.


Then China population is more than India but they has right to do so.

Nd u have successfully evade frm answering my ques nd spoken lyk a true pakistani...

 

[barbarosa]

I never claimed the whole world is part of India.. I claimed only whatever was part of Ancient India. and i clearly don't give a Damn about it now.

No. We respect the Partition and we recognize Pakistan as a Country. Kashmir also was a Sovereign country in 47 like India and Pakistan. So do tell me Why did Pakistan Attack Kashmir in 48???

kashmir consist of Jammu and Leh as well they're also the people of Kashmir for centuries. do consider that too.... you're only seeing some punch of people from the valley... Do consider the Pundits as well they're also the origins of Kashmir. Kashmir has the hindu Temples which is very older than Islam itself. Read the original History of Kashmir from the Neutral
source not from Pakistani Sites.

Now the real Question i want you to answer is Why was a Sovereign Kashmir was Attacked by Pakistan in 48???, Kashmir was not a part of India or pakistan in 48.

Your history tell you that Pakistan attacked on Kashmir in 1948,
our history tell us that India attacked over Kashmir in 1948, as India violate the treaty and occupied siachen, Arunachalpardesh, these realities show that India had attacked on Kashmir in 1948.
The self determination of the kashmir,s people was pending for the next time which was really to become the part of Pakistan, when Indian govt became to know that Kashmir is going to ward Pakistan, Indian army attacked on Kashmir, Pkistani Mujahideen occupied AZAD kashmir from Indian army.
If Pakistan army attacked first then the large parts of Kashmir should be occupied by Pakistan.

 

[WaLeEdK2]

Kashmir has always been disputed territory therefore it is our business too. The hypocrisy about India's democracy is that they boast and take pride in their liberal and secular values yet once a people want freedom they don't apply the same method of thought and use sickening brutality. This then creates an atmosphere of anger and tension among the locals and resistance groups are formed. They retaliate and thus are called terrorists so easily without looking into why they fought in the first place.

 

[$@rJen]

Your history tell you that Pakistan attacked on Kashmir in 1948,
our history tell us that India attacked over Kashmir in 1948, as India violate the treaty and occupied siachen, Arunachalpardesh, these realities show that India had attacked on Kashmir in 1948.
The self determination of the kashmir,s people was pending for the next time which was really to become the part of Pakistan, when Indian govt became to know that Kashmir is going to ward Pakistan, Indian army attacked on Kashmir, Pkistani Mujahideen occupied AZAD kashmir from Indian army.
If Pakistan army attacked first then the large parts of Kashmir should be occupied by Pakistan.

Wow... that's why i asked you to go and read the neutral source aka UN. UN report on 48 war clearly brands Pakistan as the aggressor, Not India. and if the plebiscite to take place Pakistan should remove its forces away from Kashmiri territories it occupied, which was never fulfilled by Pakistan. Its the UN verdict.. please check it in UN site.

Please ask your own Senior friends from Pakistan in PDF anout who violated siachen!!! It was Pakistan which let the tourists in order to acknowledged Siachen as Pakistani territory. India only Preempted and captured it fighting pakistani soldiers. As per Arunachal!! It was always the Indian Territory nothing to do with China.

Like i said stop believing everything you heared from madarassas. be wise and learn from the neutral sources.. Pakistan has a pretty large parts of Kashmir in North.. when Pakistan was Aiming to capture the Capital Indian forces were focusing on capital, defending and pushed them back.. that's the one of the reason Northern parts became under Pakistani control.

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

Politics and politicians... fanning flames of ultra nationalism... creating a monster none can contain...

Pakistan politically weak and has nothing more than protest to offer against the occupation and colonisation of its family members.

Indians have so far successfully kept their hold on Kashmir. By changing facts on the ground and by winning time.

The indians have captured the prime real estate and now controls the waters. It is amazing for how long they have kept their control over Kashmir. The Kashmiris racially and culturally are in a different universe than common indians and yet they are under indian control. This is how empires are built.

Pakistan has let its kin suffer and there is no one to blame but Pakistan itself.

Hopefully, a peaceful solution be found and no wars take place. War will utterly destroy both countries.