What's new

Pakistan has become the face of international terrorism: India at UN

Pakistan has become th
e face of international terrorism: India at UN
Ok!

But why is Modi still running a Samjhauta Express, despite knowing that Pakistan is a terrorist nation?

Ruling by fooling Indian sheeples?

It means Modi = falsehood. Period.

ulu4.png
 
Exactly, broaden this definition & some founding father who said once "I am not here to discuss morality" will also get a berth of same league which you are labelling Indian with.
A country with full breeding ambience call terrorists a Philanthropist, all hails to logics of pious benders.
if you know the difference between revolutionaries and terrorists anyways never you're Indians so I was expecting this stupid reply
 
Very sincerely to Pakistanis.

You guys need to stop embarrassing both of us on international fora.

It does not make us look good for two nuclear powers to be doing these bachkani harkatein.

Your PM behaved like a dehati aurat. And a Bharatiya aurat was forced to put him and all of you in place.

Believe me when I tell you that goras do not take our "enmity" seriously. There is a half smile and a roll of the eyes every time our sniping at each other comes up.

You want a piece of us, come fight us like men.

But for Ahura Mazda's sake, stop embarrassing yourselves and us as desis.

Cheers, Doc
 
Point # 7
How many time India has allowed HR Inspectors of UN to visit Indian Occupied Kashmir to assess the state of "HUMAN RIGHTS" in last 10 years?

0.

We don't need them. In a democracy, we fight our own internal battles, against those elements in our own polity that defy human rights and ill-treat people.

It is the autocracies that need nursemaids.

Wouldn't Punjabi independence mean a significant part of Pakistan too?

Wouldn't be much of consequence left. Without the Punjab, without the Potohar plateau in particular, there is really no armed opposition except for violent civilians on the frontier.

India has been a face of ugliness since its inception

It's all right. Being looking beautiful and being rotten inside, and looking ugly and being democratic, we preferred the second. Try it some time; the other option obviously works only for a single human being, not for a country.
 
At the end of the day, the Pakistani team was more composed, more amiable and less belligerent & bigoted than any member of the Indian corps; that impression mattered to the smaller nations and voters- we already know where each of the SC stands and no address changes that
 
At the end of the day, the Pakistani team was more composed, more amiable and less belligerent & bigoted than any member of the Indian corps; that impression mattered to the smaller nations and voters- we already know where each of the SC stands and no address changes that

Above all Pakistani team in UN was telling the TRUTH in reply of Indian LIEs.
 
Last edited:
At the end of the day, the Pakistani team was more composed, more amiable and less belligerent & bigoted than any member of the Indian corps; that impression mattered to the smaller nations and voters- we already know where each of the SC stands and no address changes that
And which smaller nation or voter has said so? Pakistan's speech was aimed at its domestic audience. In the international forums and media - Pakistan has 0 credibility.
 
And which smaller nation or voter has said so? Pakistan's speech was aimed at its domestic audience. In the international forums and media - Pakistan has 0 credibility.
Says an Indian whose opinion’s worth with any Pakistani is zero(to echo our PM).
To the Pakistanis; There is plenty of credibility where it matters internationally otherwise Indian media would not whine about it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom