IbnAbdullah
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2018
- Messages
- 1,584
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Salaam
You have to keep in mind that there are no purely military engagements - military engagements are, as Clauswitz put it, diplomacy through other means.
Our military is there because it helps us forward our interests - and we have a lot of political and economic interests in that region. It is irrelevant if we are currently fighting a war there or not - our presence helps us achieve certain non-military objectives and so we continue to maintain it.
The Arabs may have gotten closer to Israel but that doesn't mean that our relationship with them has to end. We are closer to the Saudis and the Arabs for reasons other than Israel as well - and saying we should end our alliance with them because they have improved relationship with Israel seems to ignore the reality of our deeper relationship.
Both the Turks and the Chinese have had relations with Israel, and yet we are closer than ever with both of them. So why the different attitude towards the Arabs?
With regards to the Arab Iran issue - we haven't been asked to invade Iran yet - and even if we were - we will be free to chose according to our interests. We've always maintained that our forces will defend the territorial integrity of our allies in a defensive war - so if we don't invade Iran at their behest we'd still be within our officially stated commitment. I don't really see the problem there.
If we leave our Arab allies - who do actually help us with money whenever we need it - it would leave the door wide open for someone else - possibly a party we may not like - to come fill in the role we abandon.
Lastly, imagine how incredibly stupid we'd have to be to leave our long standing close allies - who bailed us out not more than year ago with hard cash (in addition to countless other times) - simply because they gave our enemy a medal or something. That would indeed be a greater gift to our enemy than any award the Arabs could ever give.
...
You have to keep in mind that there are no purely military engagements - military engagements are, as Clauswitz put it, diplomacy through other means.
Our military is there because it helps us forward our interests - and we have a lot of political and economic interests in that region. It is irrelevant if we are currently fighting a war there or not - our presence helps us achieve certain non-military objectives and so we continue to maintain it.
The Arabs may have gotten closer to Israel but that doesn't mean that our relationship with them has to end. We are closer to the Saudis and the Arabs for reasons other than Israel as well - and saying we should end our alliance with them because they have improved relationship with Israel seems to ignore the reality of our deeper relationship.
Both the Turks and the Chinese have had relations with Israel, and yet we are closer than ever with both of them. So why the different attitude towards the Arabs?
With regards to the Arab Iran issue - we haven't been asked to invade Iran yet - and even if we were - we will be free to chose according to our interests. We've always maintained that our forces will defend the territorial integrity of our allies in a defensive war - so if we don't invade Iran at their behest we'd still be within our officially stated commitment. I don't really see the problem there.
If we leave our Arab allies - who do actually help us with money whenever we need it - it would leave the door wide open for someone else - possibly a party we may not like - to come fill in the role we abandon.
Lastly, imagine how incredibly stupid we'd have to be to leave our long standing close allies - who bailed us out not more than year ago with hard cash (in addition to countless other times) - simply because they gave our enemy a medal or something. That would indeed be a greater gift to our enemy than any award the Arabs could ever give.
...