Bull
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Messages
- 6,850
- Reaction score
- 0
Well US, UK and other powers are using us as scapegoat as excuse for their failure.
And you are agreeing to it. Mushraff has in a number of occassion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well US, UK and other powers are using us as scapegoat as excuse for their failure.
ISI is far better than RAW any day, any time. I think its foolish to compare.
Its not only India. If India was alone in crying pout loud, no one would have taken notice. there are a host of world leaders which says you are abiding and protecting terrorists like US, UK, NATO, Afghanistan and even Mushraff had agreed some parties in his force also might be doing the same.
So we basically are milking the situation to the full use.
Neo.. why is india propaganda tolerated here? If we said something similar about india in their forum, you know what would happen. Please delete this propaganda and don't tolerate it on a Pakistani forum.
What is the propaganda now?
Dude, why do you want to follow an arse? If they are an arse, let them be an arse.
Its not only India. If India was alone in crying pout loud, no one would have taken notice. there are a host of world leaders which says you are abiding and protecting terrorists like US, UK, NATO, Afghanistan and even Mushraff had agreed some parties in his force also might be doing the same.
So we basically are milking the situation to the full use.
Neo.. why is india propaganda tolerated here? If we said something similar about india in their forum, you know what would happen. Please delete this propaganda and don't tolerate it on a Pakistani forum.
if one says anything against india on their forums they start hurling insults at you and dont want to have a civil descusion about it.
Well I think what is being discussed here is the idea that whenever something goes wrong in India that India complains that ISI is involved. And when you claim that PAK is being accused "abiding and protecting" terrorists you are incorrect. The only claims I have read involve the idea that PAK is not doing enough in terms of rooting it out. Which is different from "Abiding and protecting"
Do you follow the bad examples in life or the good examples?
I have been reading your posts in the other thread about JF-17 and you have proved beyond doubt that you do your research and homework well.
Why dont you do some homework with respect to what i wrote here?
I know its hard to believe that one's nation is running with the hares and hunting with the hounds. The problem is the "trail" that the "hounds" leave is actually a highway.Well I think what is being discussed here is the idea that whenever something goes wrong in India that India complains that ISI is involved. And when you claim that PAK is being accused "abiding and protecting" terrorists you are incorrect. The only claims I have read involve the idea that PAK is not doing enough in terms of rooting it out. Which is different from "Abiding and protecting"
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1009/dailyUpdate.htmlIn an interview with the Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Barnett R. Rubin of New York University, a leading expert on Afghanistan, said the failure of the Bush administration to push Pakistan to stop its support for the Taliban has put the Afghanistan government in a "precarious situation."