ziaulislam
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,621
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
it depends, if you prioritize a medium utility helicopter and its variant can replace many subtypes in PAF, PN and pak armyIn the 300 choppers you mentioned, we will need two or three different types at least. A single platform even if being produced at home will never fit in. That leaves us with 80-100 per type. Again, a number worthy for:
Anyway, this is my personal opinion and i may be wrong with this. Not forcing my opinion upon you or anyone else. It is just that i think that the option i am pointing to will serve us better.
- Complete maintenance and overhaul facility
- Extensive assembly
- Parts manufacturing for the parent company (to be exported to them)
the obvious replacement would have been the
1. Z 9 (a naval variant with some changes)
2. AW 139(20+ in service)
3. Pumas (70+ in service)
4. bell (70+ in service)
all of the above are more or less very similar in capabilities and single local platform will be lot cheaper in long run, and if some compromise is done it could replace some of mi 17s as well, i believe a market for 150 can easily be made over the next 20-30 years, this would be far less cheaper if another partner let say like china or turkey is sought as JV