What's new

Pakistan Army | News and Discussions

Army air defence primary duty is to defend strategic installations. forward air defence is primarily based on portable SAM systems. remember kargil, they were pretty effective.

The problem is the overwhelming Indian air force, which rapidly grows from year to year, faster than ours. That is the reason why many members here are talking about air defense, because the Indian air superiority in numbers and quality can not be longer talked down and answered with 70 F-16. Especially on the battlefield for our ground forces it will have devasting and seriously danger, see Soviet and American air superiority in the second world war, the Wehrmacht was unabel to conduct any effective offensive operation, because the german formations came 24 hours under the fire of USAF or RAF. There must be find a fast solution to overcome this danger or we have to live with this fact ! Many Members for example Mr Oscar and Masterkhan have already discussed this issue to death. Lets see which cards PAF has hidden and will play in any future confclit, Longewala 1971 looked bad for our ground Troops, the same was 1999 in Kargil.
 
.
Army peace keepers
 

Attachments

  • 1472969666522.jpg
    1472969666522.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 90
.
The problem is the overwhelming Indian air force, which rapidly grows from year to year, faster than ours. That is the reason why many members here are talking about air defense, because the Indian air superiority in numbers and quality can not be longer talked down and answered with 70 F-16. Especially on the battlefield for our ground forces it will have devasting and seriously danger, see Soviet and American air superiority in the second world war, the Wehrmacht was unabel to conduct any effective offensive operation, because the german formations came 24 hours under the fire of USAF or RAF. There must be find a fast solution to overcome this danger or we have to live with this fact ! Many Members for example Mr Oscar and Masterkhan have already discussed this issue to death. Lets see which cards PAF has hidden and will play in any future confclit, Longewala 1971 looked bad for our ground Troops, the same was 1999 in Kargil.
Concerning Air Defence when operating in enemy territory.

This is an excerpt from an officer who was commanding a unit (38 cavalry) which took part in battle of Longewala regarding providing air defence to Pakistan armoured forces taking part in the battle.

In the first week of November 1971, 38 Cavalry, less ‘A’ Squadron detached to 55 Brigade at Chor, concentrated at Manthar, about 25 miles on the road Sadiqabad-Rahimyar Khan. A few days after the regiment concentrated, the COAS and Air Marshal Rahim, the PAF chief came to Rahimyar Khan where the 18 Division plan was discussed and the PAF chief assured the required air support for this operation.

Operational group(Basically units of 18 Division):
22 cavalry (T-59 tanks, took the maximum losses)
38 Cavalry (Sherman tanks, had problems with overhauled engine, was tasked to capture Jaiselmer after Longewala)
1 Punjab Regiment
28 baluch Regiment
Mortar battery
Where is the AD regiment?

When the 18 Division "Operational group" assembled, the PAF liaison officer, a wing commander informed the ‘Operational Group' that the PAF would not be able to support the operation because the Jacobabad airfield had not been activated.

The GOC 18 Division called up CGS in GHQ and advised him on situation that PAF has backed off at the last moment. The CGS told the GOC to go ahead with the operation and the operation failed.

This was an armoured force which had no AD SP support and PAF backed out.

In recent conflict, the AAA guns like 35mm or 37mm or 40mm will be useless against IAF strike aircrafts. even the Shoulder based SAM's like Anza/Stinger/RBS-70 will be useless due to altitude at which IAF will drop LGB or unguided bombs at Pakistan infantry positions in Indian territory.

If PAF is absent, Pakistan Army would need to send in LY-80 battery or SPADA-2000 battery to counter IAF strike aircrafts like Mirage-2000, SU-30 MKI and Jaguar aircrafts but this is highly doubtful.

Any other PA SAM system that can engage IAF above 10,000 meters?
 
.
Concerning Air Defence when operating in enemy territory.

This is an excerpt from an officer who was commanding a unit (38 cavalry) which took part in battle of Longewala regarding providing air defence to Pakistan armoured forces taking part in the battle.

In the first week of November 1971, 38 Cavalry, less ‘A’ Squadron detached to 55 Brigade at Chor, concentrated at Manthar, about 25 miles on the road Sadiqabad-Rahimyar Khan. A few days after the regiment concentrated, the COAS and Air Marshal Rahim, the PAF chief came to Rahimyar Khan where the 18 Division plan was discussed and the PAF chief assured the required air support for this operation.

Operational group(Basically units of 18 Division):
22 cavalry (T-59 tanks, took the maximum losses)
38 Cavalry (Sherman tanks, had problems with overhauled engine, was tasked to capture Jaiselmer after Longewala)
1 Punjab Regiment
28 baluch Regiment
Mortar battery
Where is the AD regiment?

When the 18 Division "Operational group" assembled, the PAF liaison officer, a wing commander informed the ‘Operational Group' that the PAF would not be able to support the operation because the Jacobabad airfield had not been activated.

The GOC 18 Division called up CGS in GHQ and advised him on situation that PAF has backed off at the last moment. The CGS told the GOC to go ahead with the operation and the operation failed.

This was an armoured force which had no AD SP support and PAF backed out.

In recent conflict, the AAA guns like 35mm or 37mm or 40mm will be useless against IAF strike aircrafts. even the Shoulder based SAM's like Anza/Stinger/RBS-70 will be useless due to altitude at which IAF will drop LGB or unguided bombs at Pakistan infantry positions in Indian territory.

If PAF is absent, Pakistan Army would need to send in LY-80 battery or SPADA-2000 battery to counter IAF strike aircrafts like Mirage-2000, SU-30 MKI and Jaguar aircrafts but this is highly doubtful.

Any other PA SAM system that can engage IAF above 10,000 meters?

You have exelent pointed out the horror situation for a offensive operation.

But imagine the battle will fought only near the Border and inside Pakistan ?

May be there is a doctrine to let the enemy come in your land, to fight it than under your local air defence shield, which is provided than by the point defence fighters like F-7 and F-7PG, of course the air defence situation will look totally different when we talk about defence and not offensive operations. That might be a Idea ?

So in this case the high altitude shield air defence shield will be provided by the PAF and the local SAMs:

Everything under the operational altitude of the SAMs (FM-90-Spada-HQ16) comes under the task of AA Guns and Manpads. So the IAF has to fly in any of this red zones, there will be no free walk in for IAF !
 
Last edited:
.
You have exelent pointed out the horror situation for a offensive operation.

But imagine the battle will fought only near the Border and inside Pakistan ?

May be there is a doctrine to let the enemy come in your land, to fight it than under your local air defence shield, which is provided than by the point defence fighters like F-7 and F-7PG, of course the air defence situation will look totally different when we talk about defence and not offensive operations. That might be a Idea ?

So in this case the high altitude shield air defence shield will be provided by the PAF and the local SAMs:

Everything under the operational altitude of the SAMs (FM-90-Spada-HQ16) comes under the task of AA Guns and Manpads. So the IAF has to fly in any of this red zones, there will be no free walk in for IAF !

The Pakistan Army wants to take the war to India so will launch offensive inside India:
1.The enemy is kept off-balance as it will be tied up containing the Pakistani offensive into its territory rather than launching an offensive into Pakistani territory.
2.The Pakistani Army hopes to contain the fighting on the Indian side of the border so that any collateral or other damage will be suffered by India.
3.Indian territory of strategic importance once seized, will give the Pakistani Army a bargaining chip to be used in the aftermath of a ceasefire brought about by international pressure after 3–4 weeks of fighting.

Medium Range/High altitude SAM cover will be required. Very doubtful that LY-80 or SPADA-2000 will be sent across the border to accompany Pakistan Army. FM 90 operating altitude is 6000 m.

There are Chinese examples out there that could be procured:

1. Sky Dragon 50 (basically PL-12/SD-10 fired from ground, altitude is upto 20,000 m)
2. HQ-12/ KS-1A mobile SAM launcher (altitude 25-27,000 m)
3. HQ-2B (which is said to be in service with PAF, altitude 25,000 m)

HQ-17 is based on Tor M-1 which is designed to shoot down precision guided weapons like ALCM.
 
.
The Pakistan Army wants to take the war to India so will launch offensive inside India:
1.The enemy is kept off-balance as it will be tied up containing the Pakistani offensive into its territory rather than launching an offensive into Pakistani territory.
2.The Pakistani Army hopes to contain the fighting on the Indian side of the border so that any collateral or other damage will be suffered by India.
3.Indian territory of strategic importance once seized, will give the Pakistani Army a bargaining chip to be used in the aftermath of a ceasefire brought about by international pressure after 3–4 weeks of fighting.

Medium Range/High altitude SAM cover will be required. Very doubtful that LY-80 or SPADA-2000 will be sent across the border to accompany Pakistan Army. FM 90 operating altitude is 6000 m.

There are Chinese examples out there that could be procured:

1. Sky Dragon 50 (basically PL-12/SD-10 fired from ground, altitude is upto 20,000 m)
2. HQ-12/ KS-1A mobile SAM launcher (altitude 25-27,000 m)
3. HQ-2B (which is said to be in service with PAF, altitude 25,000 m)

HQ-17 is based on Tor M-1 which is designed to shoot down precision guided weapons like ALCM.
The doctrine is from wiki pedia right ?
 
. . . .
.
Oyy it reminds me of Taxila.
I reminded me of those good old days.

My school was in the area and i used to see those trains rolling carrying the goodies. Good times. :)
Thanks a lot for tagging me. :)



You are welocme, but where is Malakwal, somewehere in Punjab right ? (the Video is from this year May)
 
.
You are welocme, but where is Malakwal, somewehere in Punjab right ? (the Video is from this year May)
Yes, this particular one is NOT Taxila. Malakwall is near Mandi Bahauddin.
I was referring to the SIMILAR trains rolling out of HIT with all those vehicles. That is where they are built :)
 
.
An eyewitness offr's remarks about COAS cmts on 6th Sep:-

*It was the closest and longest encounter with COAS yesterday... Proud to be a first hand witness of an extraordinary personality.. after the event he was sitting from 10 30 till 2 o clock at night , met every Next of kin of shaheed individually... He dragged a chair and just sat down right there after the event. Talked to each one of them one by one, issued orders and then met soldiers under treatment at AFIRM, had photographs taken with every one individually.. And then while leaving he turned back and walked over to civ labours working on dismantling the stage and venue and shook hand with every one gave them the souvenirs as well... Such patience and big heart defying all fatigue and tiredness needs a special personality and blessed soul..*
 
.
Weapons

China develops longer-range HQ-16 SAM variant

Richard D Fisher Jr, Washington DC and Neil Gibson, London - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly

07 September 2016

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) has developed a new variant of its HQ-16 (Red Flag-16) self-propelled medium-range surface-to-air missile (SAM), according to imagery released by Chinese state television in early September.

New imagery reveals that China has developed a new variant of its HQ-16 self-propelled surface-to-air missile. (CCTV)

The new variant (referred to by some as the HQ-16B) appears to have an improved rocket motor and revised wings, which sources say increase the missile's range to 70 km, up from the 40 km credited to the HQ-16, in service with the air defence units of the People's Liberation Army Ground Force (PLAGF).

In late September/early October 2011 official Chinese media reported that co-development between Russia and China of the HQ-16 had been completed and that the missile had reached operational capability within the Chinese army. It is understood that development within China commenced as early as 2005.

The HQ-16 SAM is similar to the 9M38E series of export missiles that form part of the Russian Almaz-Antey Shtil systems China purchased for use on its Sovremenny-class (Project 956E/956EM) and Type 052B destroyers.

But the HQ-16 would also seem to have some aspects of the vertically launched 9M317M, never supplied to China as far as can be ascertained. In its naval guise, the HQ-16 is known as the HHQ-16 (Red Sea-16). The HQ-16 is also referred to as the HQ-16A.

Almaz-Antey reportedly provided missile technology to aid China's development of the HQ-16, as it did with the HQ-9 SAM system, which is analogous to Almaz-Antey's S-300 SAM.

The HQ-16 has reportedly been delivered to the Shenyang Military Region.
 

Attachments

  • 1473310444871.jpg
    1473310444871.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 59
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom