What's new

Pakistan always suffered losses in its relationship with US: Asif

I don't have a leader.

I am a civilian in Pakistan. My leaders the political elite do not represent me.

You can continue your charming campaign. I live here. My leaders don't speak my voice.

Lol
Who would you vote for in the next election?
 
.
Who would you vote for in the next election?

I am not voting unless all the reforms as promised under NAPTA are concluded.

Without accountability it would be illogical to even vote.
 
.
Not really... Pakistani politicians and corrupt bureaucrats got visa of US and UK, in some cases even nationality.
So... US support has always been there for Pakistani politicians on how to tame Pak army. Memo gate scandal is one example!
There should be a ban on dual nationality holders, or foreign residency permit holders, from even contesting UC elections, forget Prov. Assembly or National Assembly elections.
 
.
I don't have a leader.

I am a civilian in Pakistan. My leaders the political elite do not represent me.

You can continue your charming campaign. I live here. My leaders don't speak my voice.

Lol

Is it enough to say that and get exonerated from the responsibility? The nations have to prove themselves as units. International community does not accept my claims as an individual from masses. Have we done enough to get rid off these corrupt traitors?

The day we have cleaned our house and braved the resistance from both internal and external enemies as a unit, we will be respected by the international community.
 
.
During days of musharaf Pakistan suffered ...relationship was fine...

A lot of countries suffered due to the WoT. Not just Pakistan. We had to act-do we give in to US demands and at least safe guard some semblance of a future-or do we ignore the demands and be labeled as a rogue state like North Korea?

Musharraf had acted and he had made decisions (apart from the NRO) that were absolutely in Pakistan's interests from 1999-2007.

Do you think a democratic leader would have handled things differently? I can image Benazir or Nawaz trying to answer a call where they are being threatened to be bombed into the stone age.

This is truth based on observation-military regimes are more efficient in dealing with the big powers. Civilian blood suckers with all their 'tajurba' are abysmal.
 
.
There should be a ban on dual nationality holders, or foreign residency permit holders, from even contesting UC elections, forget Prov. Assembly or National Assembly elections.
What is UC?
I agree with you but there should be a mechanism if a dual national is ready to let the other nationality go and transfer his/her wealth into Pakistan, then there should be no issue. They should hold no iqamas.
 
.
A lot of countries suffered due to the WoT. Not just Pakistan. We had to act-do we give in to US demands and at least safe guard some semblance of a future-or do we ignore the demands and be labeled as a rogue state like North Korea?

Musharraf had acted and he had made decisions (apart from the NRO) that were absolutely in Pakistan's interests from 1999-2007.

Do you think a democratic leader would have handled things differently? I can image Benazir or Nawaz trying to answer a call where they are being threatened to be bombed into the stone age.

This is truth based on observation-military regimes are more efficient in dealing with the big powers. Civilian blood suckers with all their 'tajurba' are abysmal.


I am not disagreeing with his initial decisions... but once he developed a relationship with US, 2005-6 era, he started to look after US interests more than pakistans.... and completely ignored /failed to comprehend that Pakistan was stuck in a US double game.... he started acting as US b:tch and still is in same mind set if you have seen any of his recent interviews after trumps speech

we have several generals saying that he used to meet visiting americans alone and keep meeting very secret... even core commander quetta was not aware when US was allowed to place drone at shamsi
 
.
What is UC?
I agree with you but there should be a mechanism if a dual national is ready to let the other nationality go and transfer his/her wealth into Pakistan, then there should be no issue. They should hold no iqamas.
UC = Union Council.
 
. .
I am not disagreeing with his initial decisions... but once he developed a relationship with US, 2005-6 era, he started to look after US interests more than pakistans.... and completely ignored /failed to comprehend that Pakistan was stuck in a US double game.... he started acting as US b:tch and still is in same mind set if you have seen any of his recent interviews after trumps speech

we have several generals saying that he used to meet visiting americans alone and keep meeting very secret... even core commander quetta was not aware when US was allowed to place drone at shamsi
You say that as if civilian leaders some how have a bigger backbone when facing the U.S
 
. . . . . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom