LKJ86
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2018
- Messages
- 24,704
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
USA is still top.the two leading countries in aviation, Russia is out of the picture in this one!
China needs to keep working very hard for a long time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
USA is still top.the two leading countries in aviation, Russia is out of the picture in this one!
CHINA will get there!USA is still top.
China needs to keep working very hard for a long time.
No, probably china will create standards in near future, take an altogether different path.CHINA will get there!
You cannot speed up products like that. It is not without reason people are saying that the project will take 10 yrs to materialize. I think it is very likely we might not see a platform till 35. This leaves me with a decade+/-5yrs to contend with (I think in planning one takes the worst possible scenario ) and hence my assumption of newer blocks of JFT which is where this discussion started. I understand the fact that there may be 2 separate assembly lines but that is quite an expense for PAC unless we have significant orders.A ..... No. But better answer for me is to speed up AZM system development.
B & C ..... We are doing upgrades to 1960s vintage mirages ..... There will be lots of upgrades to JF17 platform (Both Software and Hardware). Newer block (more fighters) and upgrade both will need to be there. Azm should have different production lines.
D ..... Agree with you. Think Azm as AZM system, not only 5th gen fighter. Speed up is the only answer. JF17 model (starting with available mature tech and then incremental capability increase) is excellent in reducing timeline. Things should start coming out in 3-5 years with final product should be there in 8-10 years. we don't always need to be reactive to Indian developments. We need to be visionary and proactive.
And one more thing is that if I am not wrong (I could be as I am no technical person) stealth shaping with internal weapon bay is less difficult task then the other 5th gen goodies. Leaving only these 2 won't be a good thing and cause more waste of time.
I could be wrong but these are my views.
There is 100 years of industrial development backing the Us aviation industry. China has only really been there since the last 40 years. It will take them another10 -20yrs to catch up to the US.No, probably china will create standards in near future, take an altogether different path.
Reason : USA have mustered 5th gen fighters. China still doesn’t know the 100% or even to my guess 60% of F-22/F-35 tech and yet they have J-20 claiming to be 5th gen. They tried their level best but don’t know all the studies USA have for 5th gen. So china will definitely carry on a different path and will introduce something totally new in this field
No, probably china will create standards in near future, take an altogether different path.
Reason : USA have mustered 5th gen fighters. China still doesn’t know the 100% or even to my guess 60% of F-22/F-35 tech and yet they have J-20 claiming to be 5th gen. They tried their level best but don’t know all the studies USA have for 5th gen. So china will definitely carry on a different path and will introduce something totally new in this field
And where will that innovation going to come from.?I have said it plenty of times that if China wants to be a TRUE Superpower than it can never become a Superpower if it tries to copy the US because it will always lag the US. The Only way that China can beat US and others is to innovate and come up with New Energy Source and new weapons systems based on an entirely different design philosophy. People say that you DO NOT need to reinvent the wheel. I say why do you even need WHEELS?? Come up with something extraordinary and you will not need wheels ever again. And this is what any nation which wants to the supreme power needs to do.
And where will that innovation going to come from.?
China population is getting old and decades old policy of single child is now showing its colors while minorities are prosecuted ...talent is being sucked into USA.
In USA half of the people in MIT are immigrants inculding chinese
USA also thinks so.And where will that innovation going to come from.?
China population is getting old and decades old policy of single child is now showing its colors while minorities are prosecuted ...talent is being sucked into USA.
In USA half of the people in MIT are immigrants inculding chinese
A joint FGFA NGF platform co developed by PAF and TuAF has more potential and probability of happening (God knows what talks are going inside) than one can imagine.When I was a mere teenager in 80's, I thought that it would be great to have a joint fighter program with Turkey, with perhaps Iran as third partner (I was obviously more naive back then).
Each partner could take the lead in either airframe, or engine, or avionics. I thought that it could be done within a decade (yes, naive again), to get a fighter that would be dependable & cutting edge.
It would be great if Pakistan could partner with Turkey on a complete jet, minus the engine perhaps? Going the FGFA route independently could become cost-prohibitive. Just look at recent GDP growth numbers.
Collaboration should be encouraged with whomever is willing to collaborate with us. As long as Pakistan's interests get served. That should be the primary consideration. Be it China, Turkey or any other country. But in the immediate future I am seeing this collaboration being heavily dependent on Chinese help to start off the initial work. Turkey will be useful in sharing their expertise in subsystems like GaN based AESA radar TRMs, EW suites and targeting pods etc. Pakistan could be useful in working as a conduit of know-how between the other two and as eventually providing the trained workforce to keep prices down comparatively.A joint FGFA NGF platform co developed by PAF and TuAF has more potential and probability of happening (God knows what talks are going inside) than one can imagine.
Reason : Turkey has been rejected F-35 and TF-X is going to be a dual engine air superiority fighter in class between heavy and medium. It is intended to replace F-16s.
PAF on the other hand plans AZM as possible replacement of F-16s but in limited numbers to around 120-150 (my guess due to costs and heavy maintenance requirements).
So both Air forces have a grey area where number boosting, single engine advanced fighter is required and this is where a program can be initiated to go 5+/6th Gen and timeline should be around 2035-2040.
@Bilal Khan (Quwa) @aliyusuf
Interestingly COAS visited them as well and Former ACM visited them too!