Incog_nito
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2016
- Messages
- 1,189
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
L-159 coming to PAF?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks are subjective, but yes, the JF-17B is more advanced. It is built with the three-axis FBW system, has a lower wing-loading and new areas for fuel (compensating for the loss caused by the second seat). I hope the JF-17 Block-III just uses the JF-17B airframe. You can make a single seat variant of the JF-17B much in the same way Mikoyan made single seat MiG-29KUB or Czech L-159A (i.e. retaining the same airframe, but replacing the rear seat with the spine extension) @messiachis it just me or the B model looks much more advanced than the As? Just has a much slicker look...
where are we going to bring a very strong engine?View attachment 442046
?? It is more likely that paf /pac May be working on single engine variant ??
A single engine in 140-150 KN class could be viable. For a light NGF, what is the thrust rating of Chinese engine to be used on J-20 in future.where are we going to bring a very strong engine?
you would need at least an f-35 class engine, which we dot have
so almost certainly a twin engine
This new AW139 was test flying 09oct17 at Venegono in Italy.
Probably delivered by now in one of those An-124s
View attachment 442066
Sorry if this was posted before.
Rgds
Erwin
well look at f-35 it has 180+ engine and still is considered under poweredA single engine in 140-150 KN class could be viable. For a light NGF, what is the thrust rating of Chinese engine to be used on J-20 in future.
The latest news indicated that the JF-17B 02 prototype flew for the first time on December 7, 2017.
- Last Updated 12/8/17
View attachment 441699
A single engine in 140-150 KN could be viable. For a light NGF, what is the thrust rating of Chinese engine to be used on J-20 in future.where are we going to bring a very strong engine?
you would need at least an f-35 class engine, which we dot have
so almost certainly a twin engine
It needs not necessarily to be in the category of F-35. A MTOW of 16-20 tons would suffice.well look at f-35 it has 180+ engine and still is considered under powered
so why do people think F 35 is under powered and doesn't has enough space for weapons(which i dont think)A single engine in 140-150 KN could be viable. For a light NGF, what is the thrust rating of Chinese engine to be used on J-20 in future.
It needs not necessarily to be in the category of F-35. A MTOW of 16-20 tons would suffice.
Probably for additional avionics or a slight re-design. Definitely looks better than the single-seat version in my opinion.Looks like the dorsal "hump" is not as pronounced as in the first example, any PS experts to do some visual/pixel calc?